whoman69

First off you should state what level of player you are. You can set your level normally by saying how far you have gone in the campaign and with what character.

s usual I get someone from the left totally misguided. By your rule of thumb if your wife, sister or mother got raped I could excuse it with . How many times did they walk the streets safely? This rape is in no way indicitive of the street she walked on. Idiot. Idiotic analogy. I in no way pardon the actions of those who attacked this veteran.

The same arguments were made the last time the minimum wage was raise and calamity did not follow then. The fact that 28 states have had to raise the standard because the federal government has not acted is a disgrace.

That is why you are a dangerous liberal! A thinking one! Really. So unless you support a war that has had every reason for starting it debunked then you are non-thinking. Interesting. Oct. 25 Bush says absolutely we're winning. Post election the reality seeps in.

To a Democrat, "Bipartisan" means, "Do it my way" From a President that practically made the word unilateral a household word.

Spamity Spam, Spamity Spam zzzz

The argument from the right is this- 'if you disagree with us then you must not be a christian or don't care about this country.' I'm not sure which side is more arrogant. Guess for right now it must be the right since they talked about fiscal conservatism while feeding the pork barrel that kept them in office, talked about being socially conservative while having marital affairs of their own uncovered, and talked tough about the war on terror while following blindly someone who has no clue on

I am certainly not happy that we are losing the war. I'm not happy that we were there in the first place. Despite continued claims from Dick Cheney, this war never had anything to do with the war on terror. A bipartisan commitee appointed by a Republican led congress has debunked every reason given for going to war, from non-existent weapons of mass destruction, to tenuous at best relation to terror. Once we were there results were predictable. We went to Iraq trying to occupy a cou

How many times has Mr. Sanchez or other veterans gone somewhere and nothing happened? We are talking about this because its not normal behavior. Once again the right takes a situation on the fringes and puts it out that this is normal behavior for the other side and that they all feel the same way. The people who acted in this manner do not represent the norm for the Democratic party.

Its in the political machine data file. They are opened with notepad. Just don't mess with the Core Candidates file or you could have problems.

Winfield S. Hancock State: Pennsylvania Party: Democrat Stats: Charisma: 8 Comeliness: 7 Compassion: 6 Credibility: 6 Experience: 4 Integrity: 6 Intelligence: 6 Media Bias: 7 Military Experience: 8 Minority Appeal: 5 Religious: 5 Stamina: 7 Fund Raising Ability: 6 Money: 7 This one was difficult because almost everything written about him is his military history. He lost to Garfield by just 10,000 votes.

Edit: can edit above, don't know why Harrison's stamina should be 7

Grover Cleveland State: New York Party: Democrat Stats: Charisma: 6 Comeliness: 6 Compassion: 6 Credibility: 6 Experience: 6 Integrity: 8 Intelligence: 6 Media Bias: 2 Military Experience: 3 Minority Appeal: 5 Religious: 5 Stamina: 7 Fund Raising Ability: 6 Money: 7

Bejamin Harrison State: Indiana Party: Republican Stats: Charisma: 7 Comeliness: 6 Compassion: 7 Credibility: 6 Experience: 6 Integrity: 5 Intelligence: 8 Media Bias: 2 Military Experience: 6 Minority Appeal: 5 Religious: 5 Stamina: 5 Fund Raising Ability: 6 Money: 7 Historical note: Was grandson of William Henry Harrison, who died in office after one month when he caught pneumonia on his inaugeration. For some

Rutherford B. Hayes State: Ohio Party: Republican Stats: Charisma: 6 Comeliness: 5 Compassion: 6 Credibility: 6 Experience: 6 Integrity: 5 Intelligence: 8 Media Bias: 2 Military Experience: 5 Minority Appeal: 5 Religious: 5 Stamina: 5 Fund Raising Ability: 7 Money: 7 Historical note: Was the victor in the disputed election of 1876. His low stamina rating is a result of the fact that he left the electioneering t

Rutherford B. Hayes State: Ohio Party: Republican Stats: Charisma: 8 Comeliness: 5 Compassion: 6 Credibility: 6 Experience: 6 Integrity: 5 Intelligence: 8 Media Bias: 2 Military Experience: 5 Minority Appeal: 5 Religious: 5 Stamina: 5 Fund Raising Ability: 7 Money: 7 Historical note: Was the victor in the disputed election of 1876. His low stamina rating is a result of the fact that he left the electioneering t

Trying to balance the points out to what is offered is self defeating. The points should be used to determine how good a candidate is. If you have a character like Alf Landon or George McGovern then you may not even use all the points. If you're creating a character like William McKinley or Andrew Jackson, there is no way that you can do that realistically on the points they give. When I create a character I try to balance out how good a candidate they are balanced against their place in

Je ne parlaiz pas Francais.

You want to add ulterior motives to anyone, the person would be Joe Lieberman. As a Democrat his seniority puts him in line for those positions. As a Republican he would be in the same category he was in the previous minority. Staying an independent locks him out completely. Lieberman was the Democratic nominee for VP. He has a bit invested in the party. But all the neo-conservatives think that every Dem needs to be Zell. Talk about your loyalty.

Allen is dead in the water after his defeat. Rice has vehemently denied running. So far the only person that has filed is former Iowa Governor Tom Vilsack. Rudy Guiliani has filed to forms so that he can look into running without officially declaring. McCain is reportedly close to doing so. Its a no brainer that Hillary will also run. Personally I think that she would crystalize opposition to her. I'm hoping the Republicans run Jeb Bush.

Hispanics flocking to the Democratic side and the religious right running out of states to put up gay marriage referendums. The Republicans are run by someone that didn't stick his hand out of the quicksand to be saved until his head went under. Democrats realize they got in only because the Republicans screwed it up so bad with their stay the course Iraq strategy and hand in the cookie jar membership. The Democratic party also realizes this is a what have you done for me lately electorate.

A very simple way to make new candidates is to have the game do it for you. Simply create the candidate in the game and then edit the candidate file in the data folder with notebook. That way you are not bound by the point restrictions of the game.

If you want to go beyond the amount of points allowed by the game you can create your own files using this post as a guide WWW Link A very easy way would be to create the characters using the 'new' button in the game and then going into the file in the data folder and editing those stats. Never edit the core characters file. My advice is to not go overboard on any stats. Those who have studied history wil

Independents are considered in the equation. If the candidates are not winning over the people in a state, then a certain number of them may go independent. You may notice that if you add the percentages up for the two major candidates, they don't always equal 100. I have nothing to back it up, but I believe the more negative advertising is done, the more independent vote comes out. Getting 5% nationwide with an independent is considered a great run.

To get a game started online you have to have opponents ready to play. This game is over two years old and frankly most who played online did so before the 2004 election. If you want to play someone online then I would suggest that you put the times you would be waiting for an opponent on this board, including your time zone. I would also suggest posting which party you wish to play.