whoman69

This article whitewashes the many problems we have had in Iraq led by the policies of the Bush administration. First off not enough troops to bring stability after taking new territory. The Iraqis were left with zero control and rampant looting after the war. The administration pushes the blame to the military. That theory fails to point out that the main proponent in the military who said we would need more troops was silenced into lame duck statu

Citizen MythicalMino - 10/26/2004 5:10:40 AM well, the only good thing about Bush losing, and Kerry winning....that postpones Hilary Clinton for at least 8 years. But really....why do the democrats go to John Kerry? IN FREAKING WAR TIME??????????????? This guy has no solid record on standing with the military,

I live in Iowa, and I personally believe the polls are going to be wrong. Democrats have outdone Republicans in registering new voters 5 to 1 and independents even beat out Republicans 2 to 1. The difference in the last election for this state was about 2 votes per precinct. For their last visits to the 2nd largest city, Cedar Rapids, Bush had about 3000 people at his rally compared to about 10,000 for Kerry. According to the latest polling Bush is

Its a mistake to try to put current political labels on historical candidates. Many times a single issue would dominate the party at the time as the religious right has changed the current Republican party and civil rights changed the Democrats in the 60s. The game does the only logical thing, it takes the party back historically. Washington was a Federalist, a party that later became the Whigs and then during a split became the current Republicans.

I found it very telling when Dick Cheney chose himself as running mate. Who else would he pick?