Do the math. By your statistics, Evangelists make up only 10% of the voting populace. And that makes them roughly 6% of the adult populace! And they are going to control the country? No more so that blacks, who represent 12% of the populace, or Hispanics (12% also). You theory is severly flawed. But you do come across as an evang
whoman69
I think there's a huge problem with the AI. I don't believe it starts to play intelligently until the tough level. At the upper levels the computer gets unfair advantages by using more stamina than they have, getting more money than they should without having to work for it. How do you get $34 million to spend when you don't have hardly any HQs? The AI should play better at higher levels, not just rely on cheating. Also at higher levels what you d
That's because their book of faith tells them to. I have the same book they do. It mentions compromise quite a bit, doesn't say anything about forcing people to believe something they don't. <TD cl
Err, should say evangelical right
Watching an interview last evening with a leader of the Evangelical right admitting his group will not seek any compromise, and "that's what scares liberals about us." This vocal minority wishes to impose its will onto the majority of Americans. They would seek more ammendments like that in OK which not only banned gay marriage but also banned any sort of civil unions for gays. A majority of Americans bel
think this man would handily qualify for knowing what he's talking about, don't you?And while I'm at it...Can *you*explain why the ice age ended? There certainly were no hydrocarbons back then were there? Previous ice ages were cause by impacts of meteors or small asteroids that caused the sun to be bl
Your statement about Bush's plan is patently FALSE. I watched several Bush speeches on CNN as they ran them in their entirety. Platitudes and distortions of Kerry was all I saw. <TD class="mb-Body-Quo
Good suggestion
Sorry but I got my information right out of Kerry's mouth during the debates. Yes he put forth a plan to *cover* Americans without health care but nowhere did he come up with were he was going to get the money to pay for it. His fiscal plans fell short of the mark. The debates you have either a minute a
While jogging, I came up with an idea for a 19th century campaign. Money set to 5 or less, fundraising at 5 or less and no TV or Radio ads, or multimedia interviews.
I never said that it didn't, nor did the reprints. What both I and the articles ARE saying is that global warming is iffy at best. The science that it's founded on does not take all the required factors into consideration. If there's a chance we could destroy ourselves, why not take heed and at least tr
Sorry but Kerry put forth no plan that anyone could see. All he could say was he had a better way. That's exactly the view if you get your information about Kerry only from the opposition. He set out several things he would do to be able to win in Iraq. He told how he would attempt to stop outsourcing
And if you or any one of us likes to believe we are independent, free to change our minds, we're going to have to stop labeling MM as fringe-left bad guy (which he's not) and Bush as Hitler (which he is not). Bush was very careful to avoid labeling Dems this round (except for a few "liberal" epithets, here and there) while Kerry
The problem with third parties is they don't want to work to get a grass roots support. They believe the fact they are right about everything should be enough. They don't need any members of Congress, just make them President and they'll make everything all better. That doesn't sound like compromise, it sounds like wanting it all without working for it.
Logically to believe that pollution has no negative impact on the environment is to avoid the obvious.
TaBoo, I wasn't paying much attention to Clinton's campaigning techniques at the time, I do not seem to recall him attacking anybody? I can be wrong,but it seems to be a smooth operator will win every time. lol Like Bush Don't
I can't agree that it hurts to write off some areas of the country. You add up all the electoral votes for the upper mountain states except Colorado, the great plains and you don't equal up to what Texas has as far as EC votes. The population is so spread out in those areas that to try to get to enough people would be time consuming. To advertise in those areas would be fairly inexpensive, but the returns are not great because their media centers ar
Well, I used your strategy, somewhat, against Cheney in painful mode and got the highest score I ever got, first time over 7 million. This despite losing MN. What I still can't believe is you had enough stamina to use all the political capital you did, 81, build those hq's, and run a couple dozen ads in California. Its seems like you would have used up even more political points as you spent with 4 smear merchants 18 poli points, had almost all the
Must have been another conspiracy theory you fell into. They just seem endless.
Ok so Daniel Ruoss just kicked my butt online. It was like playing against the computer in ridiculously masochistic level. I thought I played well, but he got over 300 EC on me. The states I won, I just barely pulled out. States that I thought I concentrated on were his. According to the computer he used 81 political capital playing Nixon, who won the endorsement of the businessmen, taxpayers, unions, environmentalists, women, gun owners, and chri
That would be great. I don't have any ridiculous candidates that I would use. If you want to see my RFK character he is at Link If you want to play the dark side and go Democrat, I could use Herbert Hoover. I will try to get on some time tomorrow or if you are on tonight I will look for you.
Yeah, Babs (living example of little troll doll) is very liberal. She tried to run from her record when the competitor (E.J. Pipken) did a "who knew" campaign ad series that started detailing her support of prior tax increases and such. She went so far as to basically lie and/or mis-state prior positions so she could claim she wa
Guns are not the problem. A proliferation of guns, gotten too easily into the wrong hands are the problem. The NRA was against waiting periods for criminal checks, against banning even the most dangerous weapons from getting to the public, oppose any efforts to hold gun conventions to the same laws that apply to gun shops, and are against requirements for registration of weapons. In short the NRA has been against every legislation aimed at gun owner
The right is always trying to pigeonhole liberals into the extreme left position. They are tree hugging environmentalist who want to take your job to save a flower. They are all card carrying members of the ACLU who want to have every decision in life decided in a courtroom. They want to ban the bible. They are tax and spend liberals despite the fact that Republicans spend even more. They want to take all your guns away. The right is happy makin