Moderateman Moderateman

Starve a LIBERAL instead of Terry Schiavo

▼

Starve a LIBERAL instead of Terry Schiavo

Starve a Liberal for a better America

from JoeUser Forums
In the spirit of fair play I have decided that any LIBERAL that thinks it is ok to starve Terry Schiavo to death should have to take her place.

Since the liberals say they are in touch with the common man they should have no problem starving themselves to death for the betterment of man.

This simple plan will eliminate much of the “waste” of oxygen and precious resources.

So be a better person, Liberals, a few here,need to starve yourselves to death for a real progressive movement.

Starve a Liberal for a better America.com My newest sight.

So all you fathead liberals do america A FAVOR... starve slowly to death, then tell me how starving terry schiavo is better for her because she can't feel it. JERKS!
politics
74,666 views 315 replies
Reply #126 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: BakerStreetPosted: Tuesday, March 22, 2005Dabe, do you have a living will? If so, could you do us all a favor and set it up to kick in at something around the level of "A Light Nap"...If she is dead, then so were kids I worked with as a teen. It disgusts me to think that we are now equating mentally handicapped with "dead"...


yep thats our dabe always in the right, never wrong.. must be the air she breathes that makes her so wise, so all knowing.
Reply #127 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: ProgressiveUSAPosted: Tuesday, March 22, 2005Hey im-moder-rant, looks like you want to starve 60-70 percent of America. They disagree with you.
twisting facts one of the lefts favorite tricks

h huh. And then you say "STARVE A LIBERAL" over & over. Advocating something you yourself deem cruel sounds pretty hateful to me. And not very moderate.
using sarcasm to make a point I am, idiot child. but since the left has no sense of humor I can see why you took this serious.



ou're 'sure,' but as usual, you are also wrong. If you think it's being handed down as 'punishment,' that's your hate talking, not the judges.

so in reterted usa land starvation is NOT A PUNISHMENT... well then my starve a liberal should not upset you, since it's not a punishment.


Accusation? That you made a hate-filled statement? That you're neither libertarian nor moderate? That's not an accusation. The Framers would call that self-evident.


I see advocating not starveing someone is "hate filled" well then STARVE YOURSELF. ok?
Offworld Trading Company
Reply #128 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: dabePosted: Tuesday, March 22, 2005Just realized I posted this to minisculeman's article. But, my sentiments are the same regarding Shiavo. And, they're the same regarding minisculeman and his continual inflammatory and insulting posts


Please dabe let it go... I, my friends and my wife understand your infatuation with me, but let it go already. YOU cannot have me.. ever. as far as insulting. you are a living breathing insult to the democratic party.
Reply #129 from JoeUser Forums Top
#125 by BakerStreet
Tuesday, March 22, 2005


Dabe, do you have a living will? If so, could you do us all a favor and set it up to kick in at something around the level of "A Light Nap"...

If she is dead, then so were kids I worked with as a teen. It disgusts me to think that we are now equating mentally handicapped with "dead"...


the poor dabe is on welfare but she did tell her 11ths childs father on her 1st cousins side if she is ever brain dead she wants to be starved to death, who know maybe if we PRAY hard enough she will get her wish.
Reply #130 from JoeUser Forums Top
ok I have signed up dabe and progressiveusa free of charge to be members in bad standing of:

Starve a liberal for a better america .

so get bizy you two, starve.
Reply #131 from PolMach Forums Top
Here is my two Susan B. Anthony's worth thoughts on the subject:

If the people who are so willing to starve the individual support the decision so readily why not put her out of her so-called misery faster and less painful (i.e. lethal injection, bullet to the brainpan, etc.) why must the method of death be such a long and drawn out painful one instead of a quick painless one?

Are criminals more deserving of painless deaths than law-abiding citizens?

- The Death and Life Grim X
Reply #132 from JoeUser Forums Top
Just realized I posted this to minisculeman's article. But, my sentiments are the same regarding Shiavo. And, they're the same regarding minisculeman and his continual inflammatory and insulting posts.


Your ignorance is over-powering to say the least. It is matched only by your arrogance!
Reply #133 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: XiozanPosted: Tuesday, March 22, 2005Here is my two Susan B. Anthony's worth thoughts on the subject:If the people who are so willing to starve the individual support the decision so readily why not put her out of her so-called misery faster and less painful (i.e. lethal injection, bullet to the brainpan, etc.) why must the method of death be such a long and drawn out painful one instead of a quick painless one? Are criminals more deserving of painless deaths than law-abiding citizens?- The Death and Life Grim X


my point exactly. thank you
Reply #134 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: drmilerPosted: Wednesday, March 23, 2005Just realized I posted this to minisculeman's article. But, my sentiments are the same regarding Shiavo. And, they're the same regarding minisculeman and his continual inflammatory and insulting posts.Your ignorance is over-powering to say the least. It is matched only by your arrogance


thanx doc, I appreciate someone else taking drab to task... seems everyone is very fast to take me to task over drab, but noone seems to want to control her meanspirited, constant abusive behavior.
Reply #135 from JoeUser Forums Top
amen. see the above post from REGRESSIVE USA


Yep, and this is also why they have to resort to using wanna-be "pundit" comedians and celebrities to do their news and talk radio shows, because their news people are so stiff and humorless that they're no fun to watch.

Sorry...a rant and small hijack on my part. Back to the debate at hand.
Reply #136 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: RightwingerPosted: Wednesday, March 23, 2005amen. see the above post from REGRESSIVE USAYep, and this is also why they have to resort to using wanna-be "pundit" comedians and celebrities to do their news and talk radio shows, because their news people are so stiff and humorless that they're no fun to watch. Sorry...a rant and small hijack on my part. Back to the debate at hand.


all drab and regressive do is come into my site and name call. they add nothing for the MOST part, just spread there poison and run away safe behind their computer screens.
Reply #137 from JoeUser Forums Top
This poor woman died a long time ago. Her family just keep killing her over and over, prolonging the torture. I believe that Congress had no business meddling in the court's affairs. I think her parents are selfish assholes for prolonging this. I think her husband tried all he could for the first number of years to get her properly rehab'd. Her parents tried to take care of her, but returned her to institutional care, because they couldn't. I think her husband is doing the right thing trying to let her die in peace. Removing the feeding tube and letting her die is not like letting starving children in a third world county die. She would just pass quietly, as her organs quietly shut down. At the end of life, people die from organ failure routinely as a result of lack of nutrition. This "starvation" thing is bullshit hype.

It's amazing to me that these same jerks who profess the sanctity of life, ie the dubya dummy, had no reservations putting retarded people to death in Texas. Just a bunch of pandering jerks trying to politicize a tragedy.

Just let the poor woman die already. Fer cryin' out loud........


I can't believe I'm agreeing with dabe, but, having seen this sort of thing for myself with my dad (albeit on a much smaller scale), I have to go along.
I'm not going to go into my reasons why, again...just look for my posts above and on other threads if you want that. I just think she should be let go and left in peace.
Reply #138 from JoeUser Forums Top
And isn't it interesting that the Governor of Florida is President Bush's brother?
--Iconoclast

Screw you and your lefty conspiracy theories, Icon....that's got nothing to do with it.

Don't muddy a sad, emotionally-charged issue like this with partisan bullshit.
Reply #139 from JoeUser Forums Top
quote]IconoclastScrew you and your lefty conspiracy theories, Icon....that's got nothing to do with it. Don't muddy a sad, emotionally-charged issue like this with partisan bullshit

Hit a nerve, did I? Who could it have been that convinced the president that he needed to cut his vacation short?
Maybe I'm wrong, but isn't this starving thing kind of unavoidable? The first step is to remove the feeding tube, then proper procedure dictates that the next step, whatever that turns out to be, has to be done according to what the courts decide? If the decision isn't made fast enough, who's fault is that?
Reply #140 from JoeUser Forums Top
I hope this means the Republicans are ready to fund the health care of people like Terri. They could not be saying lets save people like Terri and then cut funding as Bush has proposed and Congress is considering.
Reply #141 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: RightwingerPosted: Wednesday, March 23, 2005This poor woman died a long time ago. Her family just keep killing her over and over, prolonging the torture. I believe that Congress had no business meddling in the court's affairs. I think her parents are selfish assholes for prolonging this. I think her husband tried all he could for the first number of years to get her properly rehab'd. Her parents tried to take care of her, but returned her to institutional care, because they couldn't. I think her husband is doing the right thing trying to let her die in peace. Removing the feeding tube and letting her die is not like letting starving children in a third world county die. She would just pass quietly, as her organs quietly shut down. At the end of life, people die from organ failure routinely as a result of lack of nutrition. This "starvation" thing is bullshit hype.It's amazing to me that these same jerks who profess the sanctity of life, ie the dubya dummy, had no reservations putting retarded people to death in Texas. Just a bunch of pandering jerks trying to politicize a tragedy. Just let the poor woman die already. Fer cryin' out loud........I can't believe I'm agreeing with dabe, but, having seen this sort of thing for myself with my dad (albeit on a much smaller scale), I have to go along. I'm not going to go into my reasons why, again...just look for my posts above and on other threads if you want that. I just think she should be let go and left in peace.


gagggggggggg barfffffffff.. choke gaspppppppp I agree with drab in principal, terry should be let go.. it's the way they are killing her that I take offense to.
Reply #142 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: RightwingerPosted: Wednesday, March 23, 2005And isn't it interesting that the Governor of Florida is President Bush's brother?--IconoclastScrew you and your lefty conspiracy theories, Icon....that's got nothing to do with it. Don't muddy a sad, emotionally-charged issue like this with partisan bullshit.


I thing george has shown NO ONE THINKS for him, not his father or brother.
Reply #143 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: COL GenePosted: Wednesday, March 23, 2005I hope this means the Republicans are ready to fund the health care of people like Terri. They could not be saying lets save people like Terri and then cut funding as Bush has proposed and Congress is considering.


does anything happen here that you do not somehow twist to bash bush?
Reply #144 from JoeUser Forums Top
I hope this means the Republicans are ready to fund the health care of people like Terri. They could not be saying lets save people like Terri and then cut funding as Bush has proposed and Congress is considering


Who's been paying for it up to now? Is she insured? Is she on Medicaid? If she is on aid, they've BEEN paying for it.

You libs cry so hard for socialized medicine, without realizing that we already HAVE it here, more or less. I pay for it every time I clock in for work, and so do you.
Reply #145 from JoeUser Forums Top
does anything happen here that you do not somehow twist to bash bush?


Good point, Modman.
Reply #146 from JoeUser Forums Top
Ahh, way to go, dabey-wabey, name calling ALWAYS advances your argument!


To be completely fair, the name-calling crap has been pretty prevalent on both sides of this thread.
Very mature, people; welcome to Jr. High.
Reply #147 from JoeUser Forums Top
It has nothing to do with Bush Bashing. It is a simple question. If we are to care for people like Terri, who will pay for the cost? You can not have it both ways! It is not enough to say people like this poor women deserve to live if no one is willing to pay for that to happen.
Reply #148 from JoeUser Forums Top
For the record,not everyone who is opposed to Terri being starved to death is pro death penalty. I am anti death penalty as well,although that's a separate debate.

As for the health care issue, many private organizations have readily agreed to pay for Terri's care once the trust fund that has been footing the bill is depleted.

BUT, the larger point of hypocrisy as regards high level politicians in this country is true...both of the libs AND the dems. Good reason why we need to kick 'em all outta office.
Reply #149 from JoeUser Forums Top
Ahh, way to go, dabey-wabey, name calling ALWAYS advances your argument!


To be completely fair, the name-calling crap has been pretty prevalent on both sides of this thread.
Very mature, people; welcome to Jr. High.


To be *very* fair I would like you to show me where on this thread MM used name calling against dabe. And BTW LW only responded to dabe's comment. On the other hand dabe uses name calling on a regular basis when she doesn't like what's posted. Go back and look at other republican/rightwing posts. The answer will become absolutely clear to you rightwinger.
Reply #150 from JoeUser Forums Top
That is my point. Even if someone is willing to pay Terri's medical costs what about the thousands of others. Most of the long term care are on Medicade which Bush and the Republicans are proposing to cut funding for as they support Terri Schiavo.