Totally agree... Of course the site USED to be called "The Daily WTF" but the owner recently renamed it to WorseThanFailure.com which to me totally changes what types of items he should be posting... The dialog in the example may be a fair example of a WTF, but it's certainly not *WorseThanFailure*! Oh well, I just thought it was strange/neat to see an example from a product I'm familiar with, although I've never used Icon Developer before. Anyway, looking at my subject on this post it seems rea
Kevin_C
Sure, but you gotta admit that's a strange error message to be putting in a commercial product.. It's funny enough but I'm not sure it's really something that should be in a product not developed in someone's spare time and released for free. I'm certainly not implying it rates at the WTF level that most content on that site usually does but it is a bit odd.
Details at link provided! Anyone seen that dialog?
xDaYSx Trolling is typically saying something or doing something just to evoke a response. In posting your thread with the subject "Click here for something amazing!", you started a thread that was guaranteed to get everyone to click it. When you made the first post "Hello" you made it appear that this thread was nothing more than a waste of spac
it`s hard to find things It's definitely different. Give it some time, I'm sure in no time you'll be navigating around like you were on the old site. I personally think the new layout is really nice! Hopefully it'll grow on ya!
I'm still torn about this new feature. It's a nice idea and all but seeing as Flash memory devices have a finite number of read/write cycles this feels a bit like a way to ensure people have to buy flash drives more often. I have no idea how many cycles you get but I have a 4GB pen drive that I've had for quite some time so it will be interesting to see how long it lasts.. Just something to think about.
And Microsoft does not write many drivers, the manufacturers do. I believe this has been posted in threads before, but a more untrue statement has rarely been uttered. Just because MS doesn't write drivers for video cards or sound cards definitely does not mean they don't write drivers. Go through your device manager and check out how many of the
Kona, if you want to see some bugs that have been found in Linux check this out.. http://projects.info-pull.com/mokb/
Well, that's partially true.. Are the drives on different physical controllers on your mobo? If so, then that is true, however if they are on the same controller the benefit might be offset by the fact that the controller can only write to or read from a single disk at a time.
Well I bet it happens for real sooner or later... Way to cover the fact you fell for it enough to post it in the first place..
I've always used Autoruns from sysinternals.com when I needed to sort through my start-up proggies...
Yah, I actually saw that. I downloaded it just haven't gotten around to installing it yet. I'm sure it'll be a neat addition to the XP customization tools that I use every day!
Cool yes, but monumental? Well, I'd say there are quite a few very cool technologies that still made it into Vista. Is it as cool as it would have been without all the cuts? Most certainly not. However, I still think it's a pretty big step in the right direction for MS. Maybe monumental is a bit much, or perhaps I was just thinking of the price w
I may stick with XP for a while too.. It has less to do with the resources of my current system and I'm quite sure my system can handle Vista and then some but Brad suggests that Vista Ultimate is the way to go if we're going to upgrade and that leads to only one questions... HAVE YOU SEEN THE PRICE FOR VISTA ULTIMATE?? Sorry for the caps but holy crap, $250 FOR AN UPGRADE!!! I guess MS is trying to get us used to astronomical OS prices so they can keep billions of dollars in petty cash lying ar
I really like it!! My only request would be to make the Next and Last page arrows different in some way so it's clear that they are actually different functions. As it stands you have to look at the tooltip to find out what each does, or assume that they do the same things as arrows on most paged datasets. Just a thought!
actually, the minimum is 64MB. Yah, maybe to get it to load, and if all you want to do is look at your desktop without running any actual apps. I have 3GB of memory in my machine and I use a ramdisk for items that I want to be accessible quickly. However, keep in mind anything loaded in your ramdisk would be lost when you reboot. however it is E
512Mb This is your problem. If you're using XP which I assume you are 512 MB is the bare minimum recommended for running the OS which will guarantee your system will feel slow even without any add-on applications.
A USB drive is slower to read/write [data thru-put in the USB] than a harddrive Well, that depends on which hard drive technology you're using and which USB technology you're using. Typical PATA throughput tops out at 133MBps which is probably faster than USB 1.0 and 1.1, but USB 2.0 has a practical throughput of 320 MBps. Now SATA is faster with
The computer will pick up the serial number of the board electronically and it will "know" it is different So, you have intimate knowledge of the hardware devices used in that determination huh? I'm assuming you also then know what has been added to Vista to make the calculations more lenient to hardw
thanks guys for all the tips and info!! I'll probably try and get something going over the weekend. I haven't felt much like sitting at a computer after getting home this week so we'll see how it goes! I'll post my results over the weekend or on Monday! Thanks again!
They are, however, not allowing any transfers at all to people with OEM versions. This is nothing new. OEM software is licensed to the hardware you bought when you received the copy of Windows and is therefore not available for transfer to other hardware. <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" al
Well, what do you want to DO with your system? I'm really only planning on installing it at this point to get familiar with it. Nothing more, I guess I need to quell my nerdish need for new tech toys.. I'm not trying to replace XP..
Here are my specs, or at least the ones I think matter: Processor: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4600+ RAM: 3GB OCZ Platinum Series HDD's: 3 X 320GB SATA-II in a RAID 5 Vid Card: Leadtek PX7950 GX2 TDH Geforce 7950GX2 Sound Card: Sound Blaster X-Fi Platinum I think that's all that might matter, it I need to tell anything else lemme know. One n
I'm not making any decisions at this point but all of the talk about Vista's limiting of hardware changes has given me the desire to take another look at the Linux path.. Now, I've tried this on my own in the past and I gave up when I couldn't even get Linux installed because apparently there wasn't a driver for my video card because the install went blank about half way through. So, anyone want to help me try and get Ubuntu 6 installed? I can provide any information that may be important in get
I think you would need to make an image of it and then install it to the VM image. You might be able to use an iso or just use Ghost or a similar program to make an image.