I should add: As much as both of you seem hell bent on making this a Dem vs. Us (HAHA I made a pun!) issue, it really isn't. I mean, obviously, the gop could have manned up and just voted for the unemployment extension and not a single person would have gotten their dander up. The entirety of this issue was manufactured by the republicans. I know. I know. "That there is lib-ruhl talk". But what are you going to say: "Somebody
dan_l
ID: fine and dandy. But why choose to draw the line now during the worst economic crisis in modern history? Out of curiosity, when you've got one long sitting gop senator thinking that the unemployed folks are drug addicts and another possibly soon to be gop gal saying that the unemployed are lazy/entitled, and an entire party line voting against the extention of benefits: if that's not an anti-unemployed sentiment, what do you call it? </p
[quote]Bigotry is not confined to racial attitudes. That you are unaware of your bigotry is unfortunate, but self-awareness is not always easy.[/quote] Well. Bigotry towards who? Please share.
You're still struggling with that sentence. Hilarious.
[quote]Dan. Isn't your crowd all about "Yes we can"?[/quote] What crowd? [quote]Ah the insecure little prick wants to compare technical penises, how pathetic. You're the moron that comes strolling into a tech related companies blogsite and assume others, you don't know in the least bit, of being less technical than yourself. [/quote] Nitro, come on dude. We know that you're not technical. You're not smart enough to be technical. [quote]Nobo
[quote]Well that's rich, seeing how you can comprehend that I don't give a damn what your "pro's" are. It's all about you Dan, isn't it?[/quote] Well then stop reading, dude.
[quote]So is nigger, wet-back, fag, cracker, hick, etc. That doesn't make it right Dan or do you just deal with it? Sorry, I don't excuse unwarranted, negative racial or social stereotypes. [/quote] Wait! Wait. So you equate 'teabagger' to a racial slur? I just want to make sure that I understand your problem here. [quote]Well when you use their buzz words over and over, what do you expect?[/quote] YEHA YEAH YEAH GIT ER
Really funny. Cuz it's true. <embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/NLJzI0tQdD0&hl=en_US&fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" all
Make/model of the HD? What version of windows? And was it restored from a stock disk (like, you go to the store and buy it in an MS box) or a recovery media from the OEM?
[quote]but it blinds you to reality.[/quote] Which is what? That on some planet the tea party is actually not a largely rural/exurban phenomenon?
I've written about the tendency of the derailed right to bash unemployed folks here and here . Truthfully, I still find the idea totally inexplicable. Politically it just doesn't seem right. For giggles I put this together: Top X states for
[quote]They try to please all, and end up pleasing few as usual. Yet not all Democrats fall in line with the pied pipers of the anti-gun movement. We can only be grateful there are still many that believe in the constitution. The NRA will side with those that advance their cause. Tell me do you see everything in red and blue?[/quote] You are unbelievably stupid. Seriously. Do you have a job? I'm just curious. what is it? Does it involve thinking? Rea
[quote]If you took just a small amount of your time to see who posts here, you'd find your support base very thin.[/quote] Once again: why do I need this vast support base? [quote]So another's rude behavior makes it OK for you? [/quote] It's just a commonly used phrase to describe those folks. You're going to have to deal with it. There are many, many people who don't take the tea party movement very seriously. It's just how it is, ma
[quote]I believe that... [/quote] Oh. We know that you'd believe just about anything . That's seems to be an overarching theme to most everything you say. [quote]In fairness to Dan, the only term I've seen him react negatively over is Liberal.[/quote] Actually, I find it positively hilarious. Because when you get down to brass tacs, I'm really not. I mean, if in your world I'm a 'liberal', you must be so far to the right
What was the reason for the restore?
[quote]Who other than a flaming liberal would use the term "teabagger"?[/quote] Wait. Wait. "HE USES THEM THERE LIB-RUHL WORDS". I'm really unclear as to why the word 'teabagger' upsets this guy so much. I mean, I don't really care---as it does do a wonderful job of turning him into a drunken commentor in joeuser land, but good god man: give it a rest. Like half of America is using that term. Most of th
[quote]Ha, good one about the "retreat". Tell you want, stop taking your wife to the "pride" parades to scout out for a someone manlier that you (probably anyone there), bring her here and I show her what a military "advance" is all about (Since you feel kids are fair game).[/quote] Afraid not. My wife, by virtue of having married me, appreciates people who like..you know...have an iq somewhere above freezing. You do not. [quote]You speak of policy then
Yes. I clearly am trying to earn the respect from America's least common denominator in Nitro Cruiser. And I'm all about traffic.
[quote]FYI the NRA does with candidates that support their agenda (there's that word you don't quite grasp again) be it Democrat or Republican, always have. . [/quote] Well actually, Nitro, how often do you believe that dems earn the endorsement of the NRA? And how often does it involve what's considered a 'key' election for the gop? I'm just curious if you've been able to miss the point....yet again.
I'm starting to wonder if somebody might have a....ya know....'problem'.
Huffpo's front page right now has a gigantic picture of Steele with a link that says "War Within the GOP". Link goes to this : Rep. Ron Paul (R-Tex.) the beloved libertarian, former presidential candidate and longtime skeptic of foreign military entanglements, put out a statement on Sunday congratulating Steele for having the courage to, as he put it, tell the truth
This is going to be fun : The National Rifle Association is in unfamiliar terrain on the conservative firing range this election year: It’s the target. The conservative Netroots are abuzz over the possibility that the NRA may endorse Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). This would be the second major slight by the NRA for political conservatives — the gun group also just n
You don't own a smart phone, do you? I'm just guessing. I mean, we know you're old and we're aware that intellectual pursuits of any kind aren't really your bit, I think we can assume that you're just barely able to use a mouse. So please, fill out this survey: 1. What kind of cell phone do you have? 2. Have you ever sent a text message? 3. Is your email address @aol.com? 4.
[quote]So wait, let's make sure we're clear on your original statement: You said this: "Hard to discern with so much blather in your writing (style?)." about this: "Fascinating that the total failure of a policy is used as a justification for the continuation of a policy." Are you standing by the statement that you found the OP comment to be difficult to understand? [/quote] I'm still wondering how he's going to handle that one. Maybe his sp
[quote]Solution: give the job to Ken Blackwell, who should have won the job in the first place.[/quote] I think that's actually a possibility, but I'm pretty sure it depends on how (not to mention 'if') they exorcize Steele. When last I checked it was just Krystol and Liz Cheney who were flacking this one out and they're basically non-combatants. TDB ran a bit this morning about McCain being pretty critical but apparently stopping short of a resignation call. M