Mooseplow

[quote]Really? Palin is Poor? Shazaam! I never knew that McCain grew up poor! But it would do you well to stop spouting discredited talking points and lies, and present facts and truths. BTW: Last I checked, not all Poor people had relatives in the Military, but all Rich people paid taxes. So my point stands even with your non-facts.[/quote] Come on its not talking points, its facts, look at the military how many rich people do youu have in the military?&nbsp

[quote]You never will be rich 0r stop struggling to support with that attitude.[/quote] I am already rich where it counts. And what attitude would you be refering to?

[quote]So innocence is worse than guilt? Thi sis Newspeak, right? Up is down and down is up? Now I see! 4 legs good, 2 legs better![/quote] He wasnt innocent he was there and did some actions. At any rate it shows a good history of who McCain really works for and its not "Country First"

[quote]Refresh my memory on this i was living out of the country when that happned.[/quote] I think their might be some bait here but ok......it was 1987 Charles Keating(a devolper) needed help with regulators and stalling regulation. So McCain and other senators first stalled the regulation that would help prevent risky investments(kinda like we need now) to help keating out. He also was involved in several meetings where it was discussed how to get the fed off of k

[quote]I am unaware of this. Please enlighten me, show me what you are writing about.[/quote] Keating 5 I say that is worse than Plagerism

[quote]The top 1.5% paying so much of the taxes is simply an indicator that the "rich" are doing more than their share and idiots like Biden should shut the hell up when it comes arguing that the rich should pay more as a "patriotic duty".[/quote] Ya know what tough suck it up the rich now have it way better than the rich throughout our countries history. As I just pointed out they dont die for their freedom so they can help pay for it. If I was rich I wouldnt complain abo

[quote]Why should only Rich be more patriotic? I think that sucks of elitism. Biden wants one segment of the population to be more patriotic than the rest. He is an elitist![/quote] because the poor are the one(mostly) dying for our freedom. Hmm pay more money or lose a child, father, brother, mother, sister, daughter. Which would you choose. And when the rich are willing to run to war as the poor and put their lives on the line then come talk to me and maybe we c

[quote]Both sides lie, both sides are guilty of hate-mongering, both are responsible for mean-spirited campaigns. I'm not sure exactly how you can honestly say that the Democrats don't spew hate while throwing mud from the same mud pit.[/quote] I think he is refering to far right mainstreamers such as Rush(I make 38+ million a year on public radio), hannity, and so on.

[quote]I have less respect for Senator Biden because he was found out to be a liar and a plagiarist and rejected by his own party each time he ran for president. [/quote] Just let me understand what you are saying here. You would rather have a guy(McCain) who has massive questions of public corruption, and delaying regulation to "help" friends then a guy who didnt tell the truth about a speech he didnt write? Is that what you are saying?

[quote]So, let me get this straight. You are saying that it was not your party’s fault it was Mr. Gore’s fault. But he was your choice for president and his judgment as your choice was so stupid as to pick Senator Lieberman as a running mate. You are right this is a package deal and if his judgment was that bad why did you support him? So you admit that your party has a history of bad judgment in presidential candidates. If he was so bad why did so many vote for him?[/quote]

[quote]She is woman, hear her roar! Oh, shit! She roared that? Kill her quick, before she breeds again, and neuter her children pronto.[/quote] only if republicans appoint the next few justices, if we can stop that then this shouldnt happen.

[quote]How bad is their judgment when in four years you trash and destroy the guy you said would be the second best choice as president for your party?[/quote] Thats a big negative lieberman is the guy who Al Gore said would be the second best to be president, not democrats. We were just forced to get behind him if we wanted Gore.

ahh the sweet wounds of blind justification after the fact.

Y ou want the real people to blame try this on for size. Most of the blame can be put on big Bisiness. End of story. The blame that goes to government should go as far as not closing certain loopholes in the regulation system that appear after years of business's finding ways around the last string of regulations placed on them. Bottom line is that BIG BUSINESS is greedy(and I qaulify this here--for the most part). Everytime you stick regulationis on them they fi

[quote]Your premise is one sided. Read "Atlas Shrugged" for the other side. If you HAVE read it, you clearly didn't get it. Read it again.[/quote] I always love these people if you dont get it your the idiot and need to reread something. The problem is that this person here is unwilling to admit in any way shape or form that his side MIGHT and I said MIGHT even be wrong. Ahh the path to the darkside of life.

[quote]Moose, I dont know if her statement is innocent a gaffe or what. But you did ask "how" so I answered. The only one that knows the truth is her. SO ask her already![/quote] I'll give you that but my point is that it was a goofy statement and just as I have seen people here put Obamas statements up here I think it is fair to go both ways......Daiwa I am not digging a hole just making a point

You guys will defend anything then I guess....It was a dumb statement. Ok so it wasnt as dumb as some, but it was dumb. The other question I have is who watches shows with the sound off? and why? Maybe she cant take funny crtiques, that in and of itself kinda worries me about what type of person she might be in office. But iwas dumb.

[quote]Not including absenteeism? If Obama had a REAL job, he would have been fired already. [/quote] McCain would have been fired long ago then

[quote]Body langauge. It is a major part of communication. She was looking at the mannerisms of the actresses. When I saw the skit, I was working so I did not hear all of it. But I thought the mannerisms of the 2 were pretty good.[/quote] Come on DrGuy they were both standing there most of the time. She made a dumb statement one of many to come I think. Just admit it, you had no problem saying that Obama misused a word in the post you started and then roasting him for i

[quote]ok then....going by your numbers. You're saying that Harrison lived 26 years past his expectancy? And you're worried about McCain? [/quote] Yes this was a VERY rare thing in his age. The bottome line is that the presidency is a very aging job. Look at clinton, look at bush they both looked not 8 years older but about 20 years older after(and for bush in the later times) their terms. Plus his body has been pretty beaten up over life anyway so I hig

[quote]But that is the point. You can die young, or old. No one is guaranteed their life beyond today. 4 presidents died way before their time, and 3 almost did. Funny the tangents these comments take.[/quote] it was no surprise not because of his age but because he was a moron

[quote]This has no relationship to the healthcare financing mechanism.[/quote] but it is directly related to their system of universal health

I just listened to Sarah Palin when asked about the saturday night live skit say "I watched with the volume way down, I thought it was hilarious, spot on. It was hilarious, again didnt hear a word she said but the visual was spot on." How can a comedy routine be hilarious if you dont even hear it??? It could be that Tina Fey looked just like her spot on but not hilarious. This woman is the reincarnation of Dan Qualye. This may be a real little thing but it shows

Just looked it up at birth in 1841 life expectency was 41

[quote]Think about the President who died after one month in office. He caught a cold at his inauguration, and died of pneumonia. Nobody expected that.[/quote] Ahh I hate to say it but it was absolutly no surprise. William Harrison had the longest inaguration speech in history. He was 67 years old. It was 1841. It was very cold and rainy. I dont know what the life expectancy was back then but my guess is that he was already over it and to do a 2 hour sp