The_Politico

The_Politico

Joined Member # 3039765
7 Posts 448 Replies 367 Reputation

[quote]This is basically what would happen if islamic terrorists were given full access to our legal system.[/quote] They would escape from jail in Yemen if they go to court in the US?

44 Replies 86,348 Views
Reply to YES WE CAN! in Democrat

[quote]All I have see is Yes we can: lose the war,[/quote] So your being too stupid to accurately comprehend reality makes Obama culpable for your intellectual shortcomings? [quote]Bush has many, many bad traits. but selling out his friends and partners is not of them.[/quote] Yeah Bush routinely disproves the notion of no honor among criminals.

17 Replies 12,538 Views

[quote]He even apologised for it.[/quote] [quote]He did no such thing. Yes, he did. He even apologised for it. [/quote] The only thing he should have apologized for was not anticipating that most americans not only lack the integrity to honestly look at his comments but most of them such as yourself are outright liars.

15 Replies 7,744 Views

[quote]basically it is a reflection of you.[/quote] That I prefer actual elections despite the Republican party's efforts at voter suppression and election theft? I know that you are upset that despite the efforts of your lord god GW people are still allowed to vote for something other than the political expediency of your republican overlords, but TOO BAD.

131 Replies 196,920 Views

[quote]The DNC, Howard Dean, Democrat Party, etc., etc. etc[/quote] None of them have done any such thing, you have again proven yourself to be a liar.

36 Replies 94,151 Views

[quote]enough with your sidestepping the challenge.[/quote] You flatter yourself by thinking that you are in any way capable of challenging me. That would be like me being challenged by the pile of dog droppings on the sidewalk. Though the pile of dog droppings would likely be insulted at being compared to you.

58 Replies 21,282 Views

[quote]enough with your sidestepping the challenge.[/quote] What form of brain damage do you have that you are dumb enough to think I was sidestepping a challenge? [quote]That's a red herring question.[/quote] Not at all, they claimed that it prevented illegal aliens from voting. Your "evidence" does not specify that they were attempting to vote at the polls or that they were illegal. Thats like me claiming that everyone speeds by citing an article stating th

58 Replies 21,282 Views

Gee, amazing how NO rightwingers have had the cajones to post on this thread. They are running from it like GW ran from a National Guard Drug test.

75 Replies 157,955 Views

[quote]If it is true that "it is the only way" that McCain will be elected, then she is admitting that the democrats are trying to illegally fix the election.[/quote] Dr. I wishIwasaguy that was a retarded statement even by your imbecilic standards. My comment was simply based on the inarguable fact that there is no way that McSame will be elected unless the Republicans try to find another way to have an activist supreme court decide the election again.

131 Replies 196,920 Views

[quote]were you out the days they covered reading comprehension in primary and secondary schools?[/quote] Actually given Bush and The Republican party's love for fascism I unfortunately think there is a high degree of probability that Bush will attempt to cancel the elections. And undoubtedly you and the other brownshirts on this forum would celebrate him doing so.

131 Replies 196,920 Views

[quote]it was challenged by the liberals on the grounds that it did not allow them to cheat in elections anymore.[/quote] Actually it was passed on the grounds that Republicans opposed the concept of democracy and felt only wealthy white landowners votes should count.

58 Replies 21,282 Views

[quote]Operation Chaos is merely putting a mirror up to the DN[/quote] Name one prominent Democratic Organization that has openly suggested violating election law by intentionally voting for who you feel is the easiest republican candidate. Not that you will be able to, nor do I expect you to let a little thing like you can't back up your lies prevent you from repeating them. If you had ethics you wouldn't be a republican.

36 Replies 94,151 Views

[quote]it really could be the end of the world as they know it.[/quote] If McSame is allowed to continue the catastrophic promise of a Bush third term it will likely be the end of the world PERIOD. I have little doubt that a Republican election in 2008 will likely signal the end of the United States and very likely the end of civilization within four years.

3 Replies 4,155 Views

[quote]Marriage is a religious institution that the government has no business involved in.[/quote] But they are involved in it. Arguing that its okay to ban marriage but then cry that its not discrimination because they shouldn't be involved in marriage is a load of crap.

75 Replies 42,229 Views

[quote]Also note that the early primary in Florida was because the Republican Florida legislature passed a law moving the primary date up.[/quote] Don't forget to note that a) It was a Democrat who proposed that date that was voted on b) The Florida Democrats were told by the DNC that if they simply voted against the proposal there would be no punishment if it passed c) The Florida Democrats refused to oppose it and all but one Democrat voted for that Date. [quote

16 Replies 9,032 Views

[quote]You should also note that Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina also broke the DNC rules but were not punished.[/quote] No you shouldn't note that as its an outright fabrication. The fact is those four states had permission to hold their contests before that date. In fact Florida could have held their contest if they had received permission first, something they refused to ask for.

16 Replies 9,032 Views

[quote]They were willing to have a revote but Obama protested probably because these are not states he would carry.[/quote] Actually there was NEVER any decision on a revote and the states refused to pay for it.

16 Replies 9,032 Views

[quote]Actually according to the DNC rules, they should only lose 50% of the delegates from these states.[/quote] Untrue, the rules state that is the MINIMUM punishment that can be increased according to the DNC's decision.

16 Replies 9,032 Views

[quote]no contest![/quote] So Republicans are relying on Bush canceling the election and appointing McSame. That would be the only way McSame will ever be President.

131 Replies 196,920 Views

[quote]Obama insulted typical white people.[/quote] He did no such thing. Now if you said "People lacking the integrity logically look at Obama's comments lied multiple times about Obama." then that would be a true statement.

15 Replies 7,744 Views

[quote]Even thought I think Hussein is a lemon-head and will lose the general election,[/quote] And Bush's brain addled old brother John McSame will never have the support of anyone with morals and a functioning brain. I can see the commercials now "John McSame will work to kill your eighteen year old kid in Iraq and work to continue the economic destruction of the United States started by Bush."

48 Replies 16,579 Views

[quote]For years democrats have been manipulating primary elections so they can have a weak challenger for their candidate. They did it in 2000 by voting for Senator McCain against Governor Bush. It did not work but they tried hard in several elections previous now it seems that doing this is a bad thing. When it happened to republicans it was okay and fair. When it happens to democrats, i.e. “operation chaos”, it is a bad thing. Maybe next election they will let republicans determine who we wan

36 Replies 94,151 Views

[quote]We are discussing the law as it stands in the state of Indiana, not Chicago which is a city in Illinois or New York which is a state unless you are talking about the city which is still in the state of New York.[/quote] No we are discussing the blatantly criminal, unconstitutional justification of an UNAMERICAN law. Scalia is the same psychopath who argues that torturing someone isn't punishment.

58 Replies 21,282 Views

[quote]Once again the point is proved that people with Bush Derangement Syndrome can't handle a debate where their BS is challenged.[/quote] Once again the point is proved that people with Bush Cocksucking Syndrome can't find enough functioning braincells to comprehend that it is possible to disagree with the Republican lord and savior GW Bush.

58 Replies 21,282 Views