The_Politico

[quote]I then opined that Bush's method of dealing with terrorism is better than the criminal pursuit method.[/quote] Except Bush's Method is playing judge jury and executioner with no responsibility to allow defense against the accusations. in either case you are dealing with governments who claim the right to unilaterally take someone off the street, deny them any due process and imprison them without any recourse. That is the inherent flaw in Gitmo, Bush dicked around for ye

[quote]where they were engaged in various activities in support of the enemies of us[/quote] Prove it. cite specific examples and cite direct evidence proving those individuals were guilty of any such thing.

[quote]You have proved you cant hold a conversation, much less an intelligent one.[/quote] Again you argue that I am accountable for your intellectual shortcomings.

[quote]Bush isn't running Bush isn't running Bush isn't running[/quote] But every Republican running is personally responsible for their guilt in aiding the destruction caused by the Bush junta which they aided and abetted. McCain is deservedly being held personally accountable and no true PATRIOTIC American will ever support McSame.

[quote]Do you have any better ones than "and sos yours".[/quote] But you have already been proven incapable of comprehending anything beyond monosyllabic words, if I used anything else you would have to go ask your nanny to explain them to you and I don't feel like waiting for your sniveling response.

[quote]Ok, name one republican organization that has done this?[/quote] They were the ones supporting the LIE that Rush Limpdick was just giving Democrats a "taste of their own medicine". I called them on it and their argument in response has been to claim that since you can't prove they were NOT talking about it therefore they were. [quote]If you bothered to pay attention to politics during the 2000 election you will have all the evidence you need to back off your statement.[/quot

[quote]Bush isn't running Bush isn't running Bush isn't running[/quote] McSame is running on the promise of the Bush third term. Every Republican who worked to propagate the disastrous Bush policies can and will be held accountable for Bush. Bush will be hung around the neck like a giant dogshit necklace, and most republicans would probably prefer the dogshit necklace to having Bush campaign for them.

[quote]I think ColGene has spawned a worm.[/quote] I think you would have thought Hitler a nice guy.

[quote]The_Politico, why would they be urging them not to do it?[/quote] So they don't do it? I know you have trouble accepting any explanation that doesn't fit your preconceived delusions, but too damned bad. [quote]You don't tell people to stop doing something that they aren't doing.[/quote] So when you tell kids not to talk to strangers that means that they are already talking to strangers, taking candy from them and getting in their car?

[quote]many in the DNC camp claim that the popular vote should be all important[/quote] the two are not even remotely comparable. The popular vote in this contest is exceedingly meaningless seeing as how it disregards any of the caucus states. Its the equivalent of basing 2000 on the overall total vote of 35 of the 50 states.

[quote]the Bush approach is better[/quote] If I start talking about a government where people are taken at gunpoint held away from their families without rights and never charged, am I talking about Saddam Hussein's Iraq or Gitmo?

[quote]guess even vegetables dream.[/quote] So you do dream. I would like to take this opportunity to apologize to any vegetables insulted at being compared to you.

[quote]Rhetoric and silly slogans[/quote] Like the "War on Islamofascism"

[quote]without actually addressing a single topic point at all.[/quote] It did address the point. You made the argument that you lacking the cognitive function to comprehend Obama's statements made Obama culpable for your failure. The fact is you need to recognize that people of consequence understand Obama. Opinions of worthless failures like you are meaningless to worthwhile people.

[quote]toss out an insult instead of any sort of cogent statement.[/quote] Actually there was no insult. I simply stated that you would have to be intelligent to understand my responses. Stating that you are unintelligent is a statement of fact. You being insulted by the facts is an irrelevant.

[quote]"It is odd that George W. Bush has voiced concern over the ability of Democrats and independents to influence the outcome of the GOP nomination, when in fact he has continually boasted the belief that, if elected, he would be a compassionate conservative who would unite and not divide." - LA Times (Feb 19, 2000) WWW LinkThere's one.[/quote] Again this isn't anything more than a republican, irrelevant to the challenge.

[quote]"(The State News) (U-WIRE) EAST LANSING, Mich. -- Some Michigan Democratic leaders are urging state Democrats not to cast their ballots in the Feb. 22 Republican presidential primary." - The State News (Feb 22, 2000)WWW Link~Yawn,Here's another.[/quote] YAWN THEY ARE URGING THEM NOT TO DO IT. Are you illiterate?

[quote]Reply #11[/quote] Spouting random names is not the same as citing instances you fool. Name the Person/organization, DATE the claim was made, the way the claim was made and a supporting link WITH SPECIFIC QUOTES. Anything else just proves you can't back up your claims.

[quote]Yet another anti american individualPlease explain how am I anti-American?[/quote] You suppor Bush that means you oppose America. Plain and simple.

[quote]Yet another anti american individualPlease explain how am I anti-American?[/quote] You suppor Bush that means you oppose America. Plain and simple.

[quote]You'll never get a direct answer[/quote] Oh you will get plenty of direct answers, none that YOU will ever have a high enough IQ to comprehend, but intelligent people will.

[quote]Why is it acceptable for you to vote for a horrible candidate just because you consider the other candidate worse?[/quote] Because the Bush argument of "They would be worse than me" is all they have. Their is no reasonable justifiable logic that would explain supporting ANY Republican this year.

[quote]I'm still not sure I understand why states have 'open' primaries. While I understand the argument for 'elect ability' I'm not sure I agree with having these 'open' primaries so early in the game. It is always fascinating how the receiving end of their own medicine screams foul play. I think this time they are just jealous of the effectiveness of organizing such an operation. Ah, such sweet drama.[/quote] Yet another anti american individual repeats the "taste of their own med

[quote]Liar - they have done everything you accused the republicans of.[/quote] Yet you can't cite a single instance of it. Gee, I WONDER WHY.

[quote]What form of brain damage do you have that you are dumb enough to think I was sidestepping a challenge?The fact you haven't taken me up on it would be my first clue.Idiot, follow the link and read... you might learn something.It's total fools like you that perpetuate illegal voting. Slither back into the sewer with the rest of the turds.[/quote] You mean your IRRELEVANT comparison to government programs? When did voting become a "government program"?