[quote]Most of the technological advances have been made because the Military had a need for it. Things like computers, the Internet, nuclear power plants, solar power cells, batteries, jet aircrafts, helicopters, satellites, the Jeep, chocolate. All of those things were funded and develop at some time for and by the military.[/quote] [quote] Yep, true, but consider the fact that because of the Cold War, many of these technologies were kept classified for decades before they were re
theleif
I swear!
Fools, it's so obvious. They tried to make a Fallout sequel, turned it into a FPS, and the NMA mob found out. The massive flaming on the internet boards created a raging supertroll, now devouring the galaxy.
[quote]Anyone planning a Battletech mod?[/quote] Hmmm... My first reaction was YES! But on second thought... The modus operandi in the Battletech universe are the mechs. Even though it would be cool to have space battles between Steiner and Kurita, if you can't drop mechs on the planet much of the Battletech essence is gone. Wait... Couldnt this be done in Medieval 2:TW? Or World In Conflict? Argh! Look what you did! Now you made reinstall Mech Commander 2 again! <
[quote]... since the start of the millennium i have yet to see a game that did not require you to start from your base build an army/fleet and take over and destroy the enemy's army/fleet and base even in sins you must still do that. [/quote] Maybe you should check out Ground Control 1 and 2 and World in Conflict? No base building there. And you don't win by destroying enemy forces (even though it obviously helps), but by holding important positions on the map. [quote]oh and th
TheGreatEmperor must be truly evil! Ah, got it! He must be one of those evil Buddhists, trying to start a war between evolutionists and fundamentalists. ;)
Just wanted to bring attention to what this thread was supposed to discuss. You know, should ID be taught in science class, along with the theory of evolution? After sixteen (16) pages of ranting, and still not one (1) scientific reason to why ID should be taught in science classes, can we decide on a no?
[quote].... You don't see the offering of peace beforehand? [/quote] You mean the offering of living as slaves and serve them in forced labor? Yep. Great alternative! [quote]These were people who were practicing debauchery in Jehovah's eyes, and needed to either change and surrender, or die. That's not murder. [/quote] How is it not murder? And do you think it is right to exterminate whole cities just because they drink, doesn't practice safe sex, and refuse to be
Mac, of course! Unfortunately most games come out on the PC, i love to build my own computers and don't have any use for a laptop, so I'll stick with my PC for now. I'll just wait until the Mac evolves it's gaming potential. :)
[quote]There was no murder encouraged by the Old Testament. There was a punishment. [/quote] [B]Numbers 31:7-18 [/B] [I]They attacked Midian just as the LORD had commanded Moses, and they killed all the men. All five of the Midianite kings – Evi, Rekem, Zur, Hur, and Reba – died in the battle. They also killed Balaam son of Beor with the sword. Then the Israelite army captured the Midianite women and children and seized their cattle and flocks and all their wealth as plunder.
[quote] theleif Forgiven, please, pretty please, try to read up on evolution. And not another anti-evolutionist pamphlet. The reason people get irritated is that you clearly have no grasp on the things you criticise. And you fail to listen any time someone points that out. Please. [/quote] [quote] Forgiven Study the Scriptures. You have no grasp on the concept of God.[/quote] No i have not. And that's why i don't discuss biblical scripture with you. And that's why y
Forgiven, please, pretty please, try to read up on evolution. And not another anti-evolutionist pamphlet. The reason people get irritated is that you clearly have no grasp on the things you criticise. And you fail to listen any time someone points that out.
[quote]Evolution is like the "Global Warming" SCAM!There is a "consensus" on both of these, therefore, it is declared and taught as Science.Wasn't there a "consensus" back in the 1400s that the world was flat?Truth is, you cannot prove Evolution, nor can I prove Intelligent Design.Which makes more sense? I like what Ben Stein said to the "professor" in the movie... (I don't remember the exact quote) "But how did life begin?"So... if evolution is only a "theory", then why is it taught as "science
Uranium, all your argument could be used against non organic ships. Nerve poisons/Viral infection? Perfect to take out the crew on a space ship. Radiation? Same goes here, plus an atomic explosion near a space ship would inevitably destroy almost all electrical components on the ship, EMP hardened or not. Micrometeoric impacts? Same goes here. And you could attack a non organic ship successfully with computer viruses. We're not talking about Space Ponies here,
Ah, the Foundation trilogy. That's another other favourite SF series. Here's an easy one: Duncan Idaho And a trickier one: Fflewddur Fflam
[quote]So strategy to you is more units with less "micromangement"?[/quote] Exactly. Micromanagement is tactics. Or fleet of hand (pun intended, i think).
[img]http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/duty_calls.png[/img]
Well the worlds largest carousel in the house on the rock is in the wonderful novel American Gods by Neil Gaiman. And I'll throw in some more names from one of my favourite SF series: Clavain and Triumvir Volyova
[quote]Thus, if the devs nerf illuminators, we would certainly expect to see more homozygotes (aa). This is evolution.[/quote] Nice one cscoles :)
[quote]Suffice it to say you have faith in evolution, I have faith in God.[/quote] No. I have faith in the scientific method. Peer reviews and constructive criticism. That lead me to the logical conclusion that, as the theory of evolution is founded on the principles of the scientific method, and is accepted by the scientific community, it is a viable theory. If they discover a better theory i will believe in that, as long is it based on the scientific method and empirical evidence.<br/
[quote]To write a post explaining all that I believe would take up a lot of time and space that few would ever read. You may not agree and that is OK, but I think some of these things bear consideration.Let me give a few bulleted points to part of this topic. 1. Both Creation and Evolution are a matter of faith. Neither side can fully prove its point without a measure of faith.(e.g. Where did matter come from in the first place?)Creation looks outside the material universe for answer
Well, the post reads "a alien race wich uses organic(biological,living)ships". And of course it could be cliche, but yes, it depends on how Ironclad/Modder X executes it. And the concept of the TEC is more a cliché then biological ships to me.
Wow, i loved that series when i was a child! It would be really nice to see it in a mod.
[quote]Such a cliche.[/quote] As opposed to TEC, the Advent and the Vasari? There's nothing wrong with cliches, as long as they fit the context.
Simple. No theory should be taught in scientific classes if not accepted by the scientific community. Evolution is. ID is not. And to SemazRalan: [quote]and yes, homosexual and heterosexual fornication are equally sinful according to the bible regardless of what liberal, heretical theologians, laity and priests say.[/quote] So is eating shrimp and working on the Sabbath. Yet there's never any heated debate about the abominators that indulge in sinful shrimp eating or howev