would consider it racist because it's intent was to help minorities transition into college, not hand them a degree. No, as long as it was open to all races. How could it be? There are disadvantaged students of all colors that could use such programs. Was it open to all?
With the help of program you would consider racist. That's completely unfair. No one 'gave' me anything Then explain the previous statement. As that wa
So you worked harder to catch up. Been there myself. But, you did get to college, didn't you? With the help of program you would consider racist. But in the end, you did not have to work as hard as I did, since I started out as PWT. And I earned every GD thing I got. You can have
If people are getting confused then one should put the blame on our poor public schools for not teaching basic reading comprehension to students. AMEN! Dont blame the messenger if the people cant understand the message.
I'll admit...It's an impressive and interesting use of the English language. The technique is to place sentences together in a way to push the agenda without technically telling a lie. That way your supporters can say, 'well that's technically true.' In the end, that is what politicians are best at. A
I read the article, TWICE, my ill informed friend. I was simply giving another view point to what JillUser had said. Not a reply to the article as a whole. Thank you. ~Adam Milton Hardly ill informed. But you did not address JillUser with your response, but another, and your response fai
OR you might say that the Conservative approach only helps thoughs hhave already have the means to help themselves. OR Perhaps you should read the article first?
Inexcusable blunder even though he probably confused it with stats on minority graduation within urban areas. I guess he did a Ford, eh?
Reply #61 By: Citizen Moderateman - 1/27/2006 6:44:10 PM Well, except the Foreign aid, you did very well! A (not A+). You pass!
The Democrats agenda can be found at http://www.democrats.org/agenda.html . Each area of their agenda can be further clicked on to read in more detail. Subject areas include defense, education, fiscal responsibility, affordable health care, environmental protection, etc. I don't think I saw any of little_whip's description of the
Right on Balance-Of-Power! You people really oughtta hear yourselves. BAAAA BAAAA!! Sheep. You do that very well. Which indicates a lot of practice. Did Dean or Gore teach you how to bleat?
So now this administration is worried about legal supoenas? The problem is there are no balances to control if they are going after terrorist or just political enemies. I am not a part of THIS administration. Now, do you want to answer the question, or just provide more obfuscation?
You're right! He lost to... get this... George W. Bush! Hahahahahah!!! On that we agree!
I'm with TW here. I was a bit surprised at your vehemence. I can see how the first few words might have gotten your hackles up ("Wow alot of ignorance on this board...") but the rest was reasonable. No offense intended, only trying to offer a little neutral feedback. No vehemance. Just a lot o
The Solidarity Union wasn't exactly the AFL-CIO or the IBEW, king. Remember the Teamsters??????
i pick the latter. vote dems and you'll get drugs and sex. vote right and you get the thought police. i know who i'm voting for. Funny, It is not the right that is making PC a national institution. Try again.
Reply #18 By: Citizen cityguy - 10/25/2005 5:37:36 PM Can you delete and repost response #13? It is screwing up Joe User. Thanks (if you cant delete, edit it so it is just a dot).
I also agree, but again when you are talking serial killers, that is the topic, not other white males are good people or not all white males are serial killers. I know. I think he was trying to make a point, which I did get, I just took it off on a tangent because until he brought that up, I had never
Ummmm.... yeah. Just one quick question... who cares what exact decade it was that hobo's showed up in anyway? Just my two cents. Just the ones that want to blame conservatives. Pathtetic.
So what is the argument against gay marriage? I thought we were going to debate that elsewhere?
Secondly, I respect your views on population control. I dont. It smacks of the worst possiblity of a Brave new World. It scares me that there are some people who would actually try to force such a view not through the force of ideas, but through subjugation of body and mind of the individual. <br