Don't worry about it. It is to help smooth your letterings.
Chemicalkinetics
Awesome. I have yet to beat Lincoln using Kerry and beat FDR using GW Bush.
Well, when I use a negative ads of "My opponent is against Jobs", the overall importance of Jobs do drop (you can see that on the Zoby Poll page.) I have yet to understand the other two ads as I mentioned. Like I am against this or My opponent is for this. Sure, I am refereing specifically Outsourcing as that is an important issue for Ohio and Penn.
What are the major difference between a positive ads and a negative one? I know if I run an TV ad on "I support War on Terrorism". Not only my rating on that issue will improve, but it will become a more important issue for voter. If I run an TV ads on "My opponet opposes War on Terrorism", the not only his rating will suffuer, but the issue will become less important. But what about the other two? The "I am against ....." and "Opponent is for ...
The weekly change is only for state basis. So having few newspaper can be a cheaper way to beat a TV ads in specific state, espeically issues are less national. For example, Alaska cares for oil drill but no other states care for that. It may be a good idea to post newpaper there. I don't understand your question about national position. Are you talking about how Zoby Poll rates you? It rates you based on how many people believe in you.
Thank you for your response whoman, but that is not the case. As I pointed out, in california, both of our awareness are at 100, and I was ahead on top three issue. Yet, Clinton was leading me in California with 47% to 45% (something like that). I don't get it. I am way ahead on top three issues. LIke 100+ points. Just to also point this out, Clinton didn't put any spin doctors or smearer there. Have anyone else seen this? I have such a easy ti
I have been playing with Kerry and all is fine until I reach Lincoln who gave me a good beating. I then start with George W. Bush and noticed something very unusal and I think someone mentioned this before. My George W. Bush was way ahead in the Zoby Poll in the top 4-5 national issues. Literally, I have 80-90% of the people favor my position, yet I was completely behind in the election (according to the map color). This has happened both when I ra
(1) if the option becomes available after a particular event/date? (2) how I'll be able to tell that the option has become available (does an icon appear in a particular state or does an interview screen pop up?) (3) why the interview function as featured in the game manual has been removed at all? I honestly think that it
I honesty do not get some of these presidential traits. I have a feel for "intelligence", "funding ability", "money", "experience" and others because their noticibility. In the case, of a high rating of "money" allow my candidate to start of the game with larger initial money. High "experience" point allows less expensive endorsement. However, what does "credibility" and "integrity". The game states that these are core issues to voters, and looking at
FOXnews is baised toward Repubican agenda, but its poll is reliable. If you look at FOX poll, the result is much better than liberal news like NY TImes/CBS poll. NYTimes/CBS poll is a joke.
I honesty do not get some of these presidential traits. I have a feel for "intelligence", "funding ability", "money", "experience" and others because their noticibility. In the case, of a high rating of "money" allow my candidate to start of the game with larger initial money. High "experience" point allows less expensive endorsement. However, what does "credibility" and "integrity". The game states that these are core issues to voters, and looki
Help me historyishere. He kept on saying "Cheers" to me. I am depressed and distressed and sacred. Save me!
This is exactly why the Democrat has lost. They do not face the truth. When 1960 Nixon lost to Kennedy by 0.2 %. He didn't ask for recount. Is there any reason why Democrat is the only party cry foul all the time? Bush defeats Kerry by 5%. It is a solid lead. Not a landslide, but a solid lead. Whoman, I am not surprise democrats votefor republican candidate in large number. First, we have
Myrrander, Bush is kinda of popular in US. His popularity is at least above 50%. Go read Gallup poll. Regarding Allawi, it is not simply about you trust him or not, the question is "Do you have to work with this guy?". I don't like the a lot of foreign leaders, but that doesn't mean the USA should start calling them liars.
My god. You seriously think Allawi was happy after hearing Kerry called him a liar, and that John Howard really simle when Kerry campaigned against him.... In that case, maybe Bush should have called the French and German liars and campaigned against them. That will make them h
Look, I am not asking you to prove to me beyond the reaosnable of doubt. I am just saying if you know at how Bush offended the German and the French, and the way how Kerry is offending the British, Australian and Iraqi. Kerry is more offensive. Kerry campaigned against John Howard for god sake. He was campaigning for the Auastralian party which would have withdraw the troops (that was the labor party's pr
Ok, how is Kerry going to build the grand coalition. I am not getting that? The French and the new Spanish governments have already said they won't send any troops in Iraq, no matter who wins the election, and I don't blame them. Countires do what is best fit for their interes
Yeah, I can understand how Bush changed his policy because in his mind the world has transformed into a more dangerous place after 9/11. National security suddenly surpass everythinh else. Because of that, foerign policy negotiations will be placed after national security. It is like the priorty changed if someone realized he has lung diesase. He may quits smoking. What I don't understanding is
Latour, I agree. I know US try to influence foreign election and other countries have tried to influence US election. However, it is not a openly embraced issue. It is like I know murdering occurs, doens't mean we should embrace murdering. I was trying to say we should not embrace influencing a US election from outside. It is just wrong. I don't care if it is the French's pro-Kerry movement or the Putin's pro-Bush speech. They are unn
Sally, I apologize for the mistake. Maybe I read your article wrong. I thought it is one of those British thing, which I heard recent, to rally British people to write letter to American to change their mind in our nelection. Sorry.
Texas Wahine, Good luck with the cookie and tell me later if you like them later.
Texas Wahine, I think my link (in the previous post) has the exact receipt for Laura's chocolate oatmeal cookie. Sounds very tasty, but probably unhealthy... with all those chocolate..... Oh my, I just read her receipt, it seems unhealthy but tasty. Hahahahah. Alot of sugers and eggs and...
No one think Laura has the toughest job in the wholewide world. But the point is that teacher is certainly considered as a job and Teresa accidently forogt about that fact is weird. I believe Teresa didn't know the question of the inteview ahead, but she certainly know the interview will include "How do you compare you to Laura Bush?". Typically, campaign manager will inform candidate before any interview.
Texas Wahine, Yes, I think Laura Bush seems very nice. Kinda of remind me of those "patience" mothers or teachers. You know, George is a lucky fellow to have a wife like her. In fact, I don't know if anyone remember there has been an election predict contest based on cookies made by the presidential candiates' wives. I believe Laura's cookie beat Teresa's this year. Of course, this is not a sciencific poll <img src="../images
Angloesque. Really? I thought everyone knows she worked in the pubicn school library. Kinda of like everyone knows Teresa owes Heinz. I don't mean everyone as in 100%, I mean as in like 90% of the population. I would think somewhere down the line in the election, someone would have informa Teresa about the history of Bush and Cheney and their family. You know, typical inform sessions.