Moderateman Moderateman

Starve a LIBERAL instead of Terry Schiavo

▼

Starve a LIBERAL instead of Terry Schiavo

Starve a Liberal for a better America

from JoeUser Forums
In the spirit of fair play I have decided that any LIBERAL that thinks it is ok to starve Terry Schiavo to death should have to take her place.

Since the liberals say they are in touch with the common man they should have no problem starving themselves to death for the betterment of man.

This simple plan will eliminate much of the “waste” of oxygen and precious resources.

So be a better person, Liberals, a few here,need to starve yourselves to death for a real progressive movement.

Starve a Liberal for a better America.com My newest sight.

So all you fathead liberals do america A FAVOR... starve slowly to death, then tell me how starving terry schiavo is better for her because she can't feel it. JERKS!
politics
74,644 views 315 replies
Reply #201 from PolMach Forums Top
Reply #189 to post #164, im-moder-rant blustered:

as I said twisting facts the poll only showed 60 to 70 percent of the people agreeing the gov SHOULD NOT BE INVOLVED. NOT THAT TERRY SHOULD STARVE


As I said, work on that reading comprehension. The polls (plural) also showed that 60-70 percent said the Florida judge made the right decision.

As did the federal judge, the federal appeals court, & the SCOTUS (who stayed out of it).

By your 'logic' -- and I use that word very VERY loosely here -- all of them 'want Terri to starve.'

STARVE A LIBERAL FOR A BETTER AMERICA!!


There you go again spewing hate & hypocrisy.

Bon appetit!!
ObjectDock - Access shortcuts and frequently used applications from an animated dock.
Reply #203 from JoeUser Forums Top
>So why don't you just shut-up and go find somewhere else to play and leave the grownups alone.

All you have proven is your mastery of "cut" and "paste" techniques. I applaud you!
Now address the points I have raised or shutup


I see how it goes now. You can NOT refute what I posted but you expect me to refute what you posted. How very idiotic of you. BTW I do NOT have to shut up idiot! Also those were "quotes" not cut and paste! Get real.
Reply #204 from PolMach Forums Top
In Reply #195 to post #164 im-moder-rant suffered the following meltdown:

dear analretentive ussr...... get a life idiot child find another blog to spew your hatred and filth... I am thru with trying to reason with terry schiavos mental INFERIOR.


Translation:
"I [im-moder-rant] am busted red-handed being a hate-spewing hypocrite, denouncing starvation as cruel on the one hand, yet advocating starvation on the other for people who merely disagree with my half-baked viewpoints.

"I [im-moder-rant] am also busted red-handed of supporting perhaps the ultimate invasion of personal privacy by the odious hand of big government, in breach of self-proclaimed 'libertarian' & 'moderate' viewpoints.

"I therefore have no recourse but to spew additional hate & hypocrisy. Excuse me while my head explodes."

Bon appetit!!
Reply #205 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: rombios(Anonymous User)Posted: Thursday, March 24, 2005>So why don't you just shut-up and go find somewhere else to play and leave the grownups alone.All you have proven is your mastery of "cut" and "paste" techniques. I applaud you!Now address the points I have raised or shutup


ummmmm please do not be unkind here, anyone can say whatever is on there mind here, but try to keep it civil please.
Reply #206 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: ProgressiveUSAPosted: Thursday, March 24, 2005In Reply #195 to post #164 im-moder-rant suffered the following meltdown:dear analretentive ussr...... get a life idiot child find another blog to spew your hatred and filth... I am thru with trying to reason with terry schiavos mental INFERIOR.


dearest regressive usa...altho I do understand you wanting to have others stoop to your level I cannot for the life of me understand your advocating the starvation of any person.

I therefore have no recourse but to spew additional hate & hypocrisy. Excuse me while my head explodes."Bon appetit!!


you have never needed a reason to spew hate and vile behavior, why make up pretend excuses now and blame it all on me? Have you no control of what you say? type? I do understand that democratic dementia has severely handicapped you, and you are in no way responsible for what you think or say, so If you give me power over you then so be it. I accept full responsibility for your childish, boorish and anal retentive behavior. there feel better now? I hope so. NOW GO TO YOUR ROOM
Reply #207 from PolMach Forums Top
I cannot for the life of me understand your advocating the starvation of any person.


Um, that's because I haven't advocated it -- you have. Over & over. Explicitly. In post after post.

you have never needed a reason to spew hate and vile behavior,


Keep working on that reading comprehension. You need it.

Your points might be clearer or more reasonably stated if you set aside your irrational hatred for 'liberals'. Who knows, we might even agree on things.

Please, for the good of blogosphere, try to get over your hate.
Reply #208 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: RightwingerPosted: Thursday, March 24, 2005Thats what you have been fed to believe. Open your mind and look around.What? Sorry, Baker, but yes, I disagree based on my values. And not just that, as I have said again and again, I went through this kind of thing with my father. I've seen it with my own two eyes and felt it with my own heart. Terri Schiavo is gone; what's left is a shadow. Let the rest of her go, too.And don't lump me in with the libs, Modman. I normally support right-to-life, just not always in cases like these.


NEVER WILL i LUMP YOU WITH THE CRAZIES, i AGREE
Reply #209 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: dabePosted: Thursday, March 24, 2005Well, even the Supreme Court refused this one. Very sensible, seeing as all courts till them have also refused to side with her parents; refused to buy into the politicism of this case.Let the poor woman just die in peace.


I agree dabe let her go in peace with some dignity. I just do not or never will agree with starving someone to death.
Reply #210 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: riazlongi(Anonymous User)Posted: Thursday, March 24, 2005Ok moderateman you need not shout.


agreed sometimes {because I hunt and peck} I lock caps , sorry for shouting.
Reply #211 from JoeUser Forums Top
There you go again spewing hate & hypocrisy.Bon appetit!!


can you possibly BELIEVE that I would starve anyone for real>>?? please....
Reply #212 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: ProgressiveUSAPosted: Thursday, March 24, 2005I cannot for the life of me understand your advocating the starvation of any person.Um, that's because I haven't advocated it -- you have. Over & over. Explicitly. In post after post.you have never needed a reason to spew hate and vile behavior,Keep working on that reading comprehension. You need it.Your points might be clearer or more reasonably stated if you set aside your irrational hatred for 'liberals'. Who knows, we might even agree on things.Please, for the good of blogosphere, try to get over your hate.


you really need to get a sense of humor... for GODS sake man you must think I am some kind of monster. well I am not, just pissy with the far elft, and could not cause harm to any man/woman intentionally.
Reply #213 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: ProgressiveUSAPosted: Thursday, March 24, 2005I cannot for the life of me understand your advocating the starvation of any person.Um, that's because I haven't advocated it -- you have. Over & over. Explicitly. In post after post.you have never needed a reason to spew hate and vile behavior,Keep working on that reading comprehension. You need it.Your points might be clearer or more reasonably stated if you set aside your irrational hatred for 'liberals'. Who knows, we might even agree on things.Please, for the good of blogosphere, try to get over your hate.


you really need to get a sense of humor... for GODS sake man you must think I am some kind of monster. well I am not, just pissy with the far left and could not cause harm to any man/woman intentionally.
Reply #214 from JoeUser Forums Top
What's funny is that liberals who support "euthanizing" don't do it because they think she'd want that. They support it 'cause she's brain dead and they'd rather die in her situation, just like I'd want to die if I was insane, morbidly obese, or chronically homeless, yet I don't get to choose for these people based on my own wants.
I do wonder if they'd support her right to live if an authentic document was found saying she wanted to live. I know I'd support her right to die if such a document requested it.
Reply #215 from JoeUser Forums Top
220 by Enigmatic Jester
Thursday, March 24, 2005


What's funny is that liberals who support "euthanizing" don't do it because they think she'd want that. They support it 'cause she's brain dead and they'd rather die in her situation, just like I'd want to die if I was insane, morbidly obese, or chronically homeless, yet I don't get to choose for these people based on my own wants.
I do wonder if they'd support her right to live if an authentic document was found saying she wanted to live. I know I'd support her right to die if such a document requested it.


I think for the most part we all agree this poor woman is better off dead, it's just the "kind" method they are using.

How can any doctor say with a certainty "terry is not suffering" from death by starvation is beyond me.
Reply #216 from JoeUser Forums Top
I think for the most part we all agree this poor woman is better off dead, it's just the "kind" method they are using.


Perhaps she is better off dead, but that's not the point. The point is: "What would she want?" If we knew that she'd still want to live, then anybody who'd support still euthanizing her is a murderer.
Reply #217 from PolMach Forums Top
can you possibly BELIEVE that I would starve anyone for real>>?? please....


It's not about me. It's about you taking responsibility for your own statements.

Why not retract your statement then? You know, the one you made over & over again, where you EXPLICITLY state that STARVING millions of your fellow Americans would improve the country.

you really need to get a sense of humor... for GODS sake man you must think I am some kind of monster. well I am not, just pissy with the far left and could not cause harm to any man/woman intentionally.


It's not the just far left who said the Florida judge made the right decision:
- The polls (plural) showed that 60-70 percent said so too.
- So did the federal judge, the federal appeals court, & the SCOTUS (who stayed out of it).

By your 'logic' all of them 'want Terri to starve.' And those are the same people who you want to starve for their viewpoints. To improve America, you say. Over & over. Explicitly.

I think you all of us an apology & a retraction.
Reply #218 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: ProgressiveUSAPosted: Thursday, March 24, 2005can you possibly BELIEVE that I would starve anyone for real>>?? please....It's not about me. It's about you taking responsibility for your own statements. Why not retract your statement then? You know, the one you made over & over again, where you EXPLICITLY state that STARVING millions of your fellow Americans would improve the country.you really need to get a sense of humor... for GODS sake man you must think I am some kind of monster. well I am not, just pissy with the far left and could not cause harm to any man/woman intentionally.It's not the just far left who said the Florida judge made the right decision:- The polls (plural) showed that 60-70 percent said so too.- So did the federal judge, the federal appeals court, & the SCOTUS (who stayed out of it).By your 'logic' all of them 'want Terri to starve.' And those are the same people who you want to starve for their viewpoints. To improve America, you say. Over & over. Explicitly.I think you all of us an apology & a retraction.


yeh right, you come in MY BLOG insult me, call me names, twist the facts, put words in my mouth {or fingers} and you want me to apoligize?? MAN GIMMEE some dat shit yer smoking,it must be the bomb. cause truly you are not from planet earth.

in other words NO apology, no retraction, no how no way never. nyet, nine,nevah...because there is nothing for me to say sorry for, unlike the liberals here I freely admit when I am wrong, but I am not wrong in this matter. period. end of sentence. end of conversation.
Reply #219 from JoeUser Forums Top
Our Government has many flaws...This with terry schiavo is one of them...I am not sure but I do not think that your should starve a helpless woman. It would be like tieing someone up and starving them. She cant help that she is in this condition but starving her is not the right anwser.

~Live Life to the Fullest~
Ns38
Reply #220 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: NS38Posted: Thursday, March 24, 2005Our Government has many flaws...This with terry schiavo is one of them...I am not sure but I do not think that your should starve a helpless woman. It would be like tieing someone up and starving them. She cant help that she is in this condition but starving her is not the right anwser.~Live Life to the Fullest~


My point exactly. thank you for being the voice of reason at the end of this post.
Reply #221 from JoeUser Forums Top
I don't believe that she should be let die period! Having said that if your going to let her go, starvation is NOT the way.
Reply #222 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: drmilerPosted: Thursday, March 24, 2005I don't believe that she should be let die period! Having said that if your going to let her go, starvation is NOT the way.


I agree one one point, she should not starve to death.. It is not up to me if she should die or not and it should not be left to the creep husband with an obvious agenda, Kill terry at any cost, as long as it does not cost him any money,, whatta buttmunch, and this man is what liberals hearald as right? bushwaaaaaa
Reply #223 from JoeUser Forums Top
mmm, polls. Like the ones that showed Bush as having a dismal approval rating and showed Kerry ahead in the election any number of times...

Funny how Bush-haters love polls THAT AGREE WITH THEM, and then dismisses the ones that don;t. Now, are we allowed to brush off polls as "innacurate and patently flawed" as we have been told time and time again...
Reply #224 from JoeUser Forums Top
mmm, polls. Like the ones that showed Bush as having a dismal approval rating and showed Kerry ahead in the election any number of times...

Funny how Bush-haters love polls THAT AGREE WITH THEM, and then dismisses the ones that don;t. Now, are we allowed to brush off polls as "innacurate and patently flawed" as we have been told time and time again...


Oh, and wasn't legislation banning gay marriage supported by a majority of the voters? At least in California, that proposition that bans gay marriage was passed by the people, and yet, in that case, you don't hear these people saying that since the majority supports it, it's right.
Reply #225 from JoeUser Forums Top

Wow Dr. Guy that’s a very liberal statement. What’s next advocating social programs and financial assistance for lesser among us?

No, it is a humanitarian statement.  Are you arguing with it, or just surprised of the source?