Paul Reiche and Fred Ford issue DMCA take down

Fine little Happy New Year gift, there.

I was thinking the same thing. Terrible timing. A good way to sour new years celebrations.

I prefer to stay out of this fight. I don't care much for star control. That said, I think this is a low blow.

Hey Brad, how will this affect the update you gave in the founders starbase in regards to future Origins games? Sounds like those plans are axed unless this issue gets resolved. Just want to confirm if that's the case. 

Too early to say.

I could write a diatribe about this situation and the timing, but it has already been said by others during this fiasco.  Although I'll add that the influx of amateur copyright lawyers on steam defending this is stunning.

I've been a Stardock customer since Gal Civ 1 on OS/2.  This company has ALWAYS treated its customers with respect.  

You guys don't deserve this and I'm truly sorry this is happening.  

It was intended to cause pain.

These skylander hacks have used opportunistic timing from the beginning, waiting to raise objections, timing their game announcement, timing public statements thick with bullshit to stomp on any stardock publicity. 

I really enjoyed Star Control 2 in 1992, but Toys for Bob aren't the fucking Beatles.  They chose to make licensed games and skylanders instead of more games like star control, and they made a boatload of money.  That's great for them, I would have totally made that same business decision -  but sorry, I don't believe the crocodile tears that they're the naive indie devs befuddled at their life's blood being stolen from them by the corporate giant Stardock.

P&F claim they own copyrights in SC3 (see the document in Frogboy's post)?! NOOOOOOOOOO!

I wish this was a case where the claim is so ridiculous that the judge could throw it out immediately, like when Jim Sterling was sued for millions of dollars for a negative review of Slaughtering Grounds.

I hope Steam and GOG pursue monetary compensation for this block of SCO sales and that Stardock gets a cut of that.

Sigh, Stardock is no stranger to adversity.  It survived the OS2 exodus, it'll survive this.  That said, it's a real shame that the Paul and Fred are more destructive than creative.  Surely, there was a less destructive way to deal with this.  

I sincerely wish Stardock wins as soon as possible and that every PR becomes good PR in this case boosting sales and making it game of the year 2019.

My completely non-lawyer reading of the judges decision seemed like more of a technicality that a DMCA isn't the same as a legal injunction so she couldn't legally stop it.   One thing I read in the decision was that the DMCA technically didn't cause "irrevocable harm" to stardock.  The theory is that if the DMCA was invalid,  stardock could recover the money by suing, and recover lost money that way.  It isn't like the judge was going to do a playthrough of the game to make sure Stardock didn't stick some artwork from 1992 in there.

Stardock couldn't claim that a DMCA on Star Control would destroy the company, so they lost the decision.   It is legal bullshit with no judgement on whether the claim was valid or not.

I bet Brad can't comment, but I would think filing that DMCA claim on a game containing none of their characters will actually shift the debate to be much more in Stardock's favor.  (Barring people who will always irrationally hate Brad because gaming blogs like to get clicks by reporting that he is an unrepentant rapist nazi megalomaniac)

I hope the people that may lose their jobs are treated as well as possible on the way out.

I pretty much hate every gaming company.  Nowadays it is perfectly acceptable to be rude to your customers, rip them off, etc.  Few companies haven't fallen into that trap.

Nintendo isn't perfect, but when you buy Mario, Zelda, etc you are getting an extraordinarily polished piece of software offering up hundreds of hours of gameplay that another company would want another $100 in DLC for, and still not be as good.

Stardock makes "risky" great games.  When they made (IMO) a terrible decision to charge for Ashes:Escalation as a separate expansion, I was upset - but when they heard the feedback here and from others, they made it free for existing Ashes owners.   That had to be an expensive decision, but they understand that customer loyalty in the long term is more important than short-term sales.  Its why I bought an expensive founders pack WITH NO KNOWLEDGE OF HOW THE GAME WOULD TURN OUT, because I trust Stardock.   I'm not a kickstarter/deluxe pack/season pass in advance person, but I knew stardock couldn't let me down.

That's why this annoys me so much.  Attacking one of the last companies who actually tries to make great, unique games by the people who have been doing the opposite of that (Skylanders is a terrible game with terrible toys to sell to children) for years.

Sad to say, no way gaming "journalists" would give this game of the year.   If patch 1.6 for Star Control Origins cured all cancer Kotaku and Polygon would write articles about how Brad put female oncologists and oncology nurses out of work because he is THAT much of a misogynist.

I wish we could help somehow...

Also, getting Youtubers and Such involved can be Dangerous~
It could really tip the balance of the Public in favor of Stardock... or not.
So, i don't think Actively trying to get famous Internet Personalities involved is a good idea, it COULD Help, or Make things Worse!
(and i know it does not help with the DMCA in itself, but Public opinion and Support helps a lot)

There is so much FUD going around that I've been trying to explain to people on reddit and elsewhere that the Origins game contains NO material from Star Control 1-3, but they're under the impression it does because that's the PR campaign R&F paid for.

Let's assume Brad/Stardock is COMPLETELY WRONG about everything they've said.  No rights to star control 1-3, no rights to characters in SC1-3, no rights to sell anything, no rights to prevent R&F from calling their game the super-real star control sequel.   Even then, there are NO copyright issues in Star Control Origins, and using the DMCA is bullshit.

In a "funny" way, this DMCA takedown has actually convinced people that obviously, Stardock must have included SC2 characters in the game.  I think if people knew the truth they'd be pissed, but again, nobody will defend Brad because of all those homeless people he murdered for sport.*

(*No he didn't, I was pretending to be a gaming journalist for a moment)

Wow. What a bunch of shit. Plus, the chicken-shit way they went about it. Wish/hope there's some way Stardock can sue their asses into the ground. Petty, whiny cowards.

I've been w/ Stardock since '03 and really hate to see this happening.

Those guys can burn in Hell. (not that I'm livid or anything...)

My personal guess, with no inside info or anything, is simply that making a creative game like Star Control is hard.  Either R&F didn't want to do it, or they were contractually unable to do it, or whatever.   Maybe they didn't think they could make a worthy sequel without the other people they had back 25-30 years ago. 

They decided to take money from Activision and run a company that did children's movie tie in games, console ports of older/outside developed games, and Skylanders.   Just type Toys for Bob and Skylanders and you can see interviews with PR-III happy to be working on the series, excited about 3d printing. 

Nothing wrong with that.   Our priorities change as we get older and more risk-adverse.   I'm sure making Skylanders was fun for them and more profitable than any 1992 PC game by a few orders of magnitude.  Maybe Star Control 3-For-Real was always in the back of their minds, but it was never going to happen.

BUT: once they saw Stardock was actually going to make the game, they had the human reaction to want something now that they realized they couldn't have it anymore because they gave it away.    Sorry, but you can't be president of a 100-200 person company with 25m/year in revenue (Internet estimates, they're private so you can't tell) and then also do a major development project on the side.  I almost refuse to believe that they've actually made any steps toward making this game.  What's the name of the new studio who are making the new game?  Are you seriously expecting me to believe that Paul Reiche is just going to code it by himself in his free evenings while being president of Toys for Bob? 

I mean, the fact they set up crowdfunding for a lawsuit instead of the damn GAME should tell you everything.  Suddenly their dead blog is a PR site - not talking about the new game, but how they're such victims.  "Look at the pictures of spaceships I sketched during desert storm."  Well, holy shit, might as well turn over the SCO source code to them and close up shop.

I'm also suspicious of the idea of Activision saying "Sure, we'll let the president of one of our studios work on a side project video game we have no financial stake in. "  You think corporate giant Activision is just suddenly cool with that?  

2 million?   That's all?   Pretty sure they have that money after 25 years making bank for Activision, and why pay 2 million now when Brad offered it to you for $400k before SCO was made?  Bad business call there if you had these secret 25th anniversary plans to announce.  Oh, or did Skylanders bottom out and now you give a shit?

Christ, I'm annoyed and writing too many rants.   I found out about this when I went to gift the game to someone on steam and it was gone.  

I've said what I have to say to Paul & Fred in YouTube comments that I am sure they will see.  I won't repeat that language here, and my issue with them barely even involves SCO directly.

I will say that I have intentionally made what would be slanderous statements about them if they were not true, and dared them to sue me for slander for saying it.  They are now putting people out of work to protect their fragile little egos and 30 year long lie, to protect their "legacy" that is not their legacy... it's Steve Cole's legacy.

So those scumbags can either sue me for slader, where truth is an absolute defense against slander and they know that I can very easily prove my case, or they can essentially admit I am telling the truth.  They have a massive GoFundMe account too sue people as a part of their propaganda campaign, they have no excuse.  Not suing me for slander is admitting that I am telling the truth.

As a matter of fact, I'm sure they read these forums, too... Hey, Paul "Plagiarist" Reiche & "Fake" Freddy Ford...  You are liars, plagiarists, and thieves who built you reputations and careers that you don't deserve by stealing the work and reputation of Steve Cole and the SFB Staff.  You are talentless hacks and thieves.  You are the biggest scumbags in the history of the game industry, and I am one of the world's leading experts when it comes to the history of the game industry.

Oh well... I guess I will repeat that language here...  The only excuse you have for not suing me is that you know that I will easily prove that I am telling the truth.  Your lawyers are free too you through your GoFundMe... Go ahead, punks... make my day!!!

EDIT: I don't have any legal standing to sue them, but if they were to sue me over the issue... SUCKERS!!!

Also my personal suspicion at this point: On reddit, I try to explain that there isn't any content from SC1-3 in STO, and the responses continue to be obtuse and pointing to identical-but-different-URL screenshots from steam of old races used for the soundtrack items or something similar, each time reiterating how Stardock has no rights to use this in their game.

At this point, I think we have a PR astroturfing campaign going on, repeating talking points that Stardock out of the blue sent lawyers to attack the best developers ever - and the preposterous idea that Brad Wardell is telling everyone that Toys for Bob didn't create the game. (Literally, not legally).   But don't worry!  We have brave souls on reddit PROVING that TfB created the game!  Look, here's a picture of a spaceship on graph paper from the 90s!  

Brad was pretty transparent regarding the situation when I spoke to him through Twitter yesterday. As near as I can tell by my own research plus playing about 20 hours of Star Control: Origins, the only thing that may be problematic are references to Zoq-Fot-Pik and the Precursors. There's no art, but I don't know if the names and the "personalities" of those aliens are protected by the rights that Fred and Paul have (from my point of view, the courts can decide that). The Origins DLC of Star Control 2 races that contained some original art and music isn't readily available anymore, so the Reddit folks that keep bringing that up are behind the times on that one.

For the sake of argument, let's say the Zoq-Fot-Pik and Precursors stuff is protected (I'm not sure it's as protected as, say, "Chewbacca" and "Darth Vader" are via Lucasfilm, but let's assume they are) and can't be used by Stardock. Stardock can easily remove it, and probably would have if Fred and Paul have asked (much the same way they removed the term "Space Marine" when the Warhammer folks asked that of GalCiv). But as Brad told me, even if Stardock decided now to remove it, would that suffice? Fred and Paul haven't made their recent intentions clear.

The takedown was a way for Fred and Paul to show displeasure that they don't have 100% control of the entire Star Control property. I do have some empathy for them over this, but let's face it: by giving away those rights, it allowed their game to be created, profitable, and known by many, so they got something out of letting those rights go. So yes, it's clear to me at some point Accolade/Atari/Infogrames had some rights to it, and due process has to be followed to see if the sale to Stardock was valid and what they've done with it since the sale is valid. Takedown is not the way to solve the problem.

Paul & Fred are NOT the "creators" of Star Control II.  Steve Cole is the "creator" of Star Control II, and Master of Orion.  I had more to do with the design of the gameplay of Star Control II than Paul & Fred did...

Chill Kavik please.  Don't forget SpaceWar! was a big influence on SC as well.

Maybe SFB contributed the idea of unique ships with multiple weapons.

As a kid I played star control 1, and star fleet battles at the arcade. I can see the similarities. 

Classic stuff there, have you thought about writing a book on this?

That is literally impossible.

@ Frogboy

Thanks for the consistent transparency about the pressing business issues that a gaming company has.  This definitely helps influence myself and others in a positive way learning the sometimes horrible aspects of human nature and the modern struggle for the illusion of control.   I'm just trying to add some silver lining to an otherwise horrible situation, I wish you Stardock Guys and Gals the best. 

I had intended to handle this discreetly, but support literally sent me here and this seems the most appropriate place to pose the question if I must do so publicly.

While I appreciate your assertion that "Purchased games will continue to work" I would appreciate some detail as to how. From what I know of the safe harbor provisions, Steam will be required to cease all sale and access to the product, which may include a block on the steam integration which will disallow the game to be launched. How will we maintain access to the product given the provision of said product (even when directly purchased from Stardock) rendered a steam claim code and should the worst happen and steam must actually terminate the game, what recourse will the consumers have at that juncture?

I imagine nearly all of us that have the product are well outside of any reasonable return policy and would not take kindly to having paid money for something that I necessarily lose access to against my will. Apple did this to me recently to my immense irritation and I completely lost all access to about $38 worth of text and ring tones. I have substantial amounts respect for Stardock, who has always done right and gone above and beyond by me (RE: Elemental Pre-order) as far as I am concerned. You can keep my money and I'll keep buying your games! I believe, however, that others may not be so obliging and it is on their behalf and out of curiosity that I ask what recourse we may have as disenfranchised customers of the Star Control: Origins game.

Any response, even if it is to say we don't know, would be appreciated.