When it comes to the general … I am going to be forced to accept the republican candidate, suck it up and grimace my way through the polls again. Obama needs to go…

That is one thing I do question. I have not seen him answer to that one in a way that is acceptable to me. That kind of thing is very similar to some of the things Gingrich does. They are both examples of provocative politics and it is hard to discern whether that is all it is. I have never liked that kind of thing.

Squeaky clean? Are you sure? What about lying? Or do you think he changes his positions overnight because he has revelations every time he sleeps? Do you vote on appearance only? How about tax policy? His tax rate is already lower than mine and his tax plan raises mine and lowers his. I pay less on the income I make sitting on my ass than I do on the income I actually work for. And trust me the money I make sitting on my ass is not creating many if any jobs in this country.

Too polished for me. He has no concept who the average Joe is or what they deal with in life.

No imagination necessary. They will go after Bain. It's about time the public learns how venture capital and tax shelters actually work. Then there is the flip flopping of course.

Well its not. That's only within the purview of the administration  lawyers who craft their legal opinions around the outcome they desire. 

The problem is our "bigger problems" are all tied together with this one. To deal with the other problems we need to keep the economy going and the economy runs on oil.

If you have been following the sanctions game here is a recent snippet from reuters.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/29/us-iran-oil-exports-idUSTRE80S0HC20120129

Speculate from there....

Everything is guesswork. It's a cat and mouse game. Notice at the end of the article that Iran postponed their decision? Iran supplies about 2.5mill bbls/day and experts guess about 4mill/day current worldwide excess production capabilty. Oil prices would probably hit a new record high and we would possibly see something worse than what happened in 2008 if all of their oil supply was cut off.

The truth is none of the candidates want a war with the exception of maybe Gingrich, but even though I think he is an idiot I don't think he is that irrational? Hard to tell. It's all mostly chest thumping and not a bad thing in all to add to the show since we are slowly tightening the sanction noose and UN inspectors actually went in today.

I watch a lot of his stuff. He is very good at calling things how he sees it. The question is whether his solutions are good or not or even more so whether he could deliver on them. He won't have the congress to do much of anything in the first place?

I applaud anyone who votes for Paul. To me its a non establishment vote and that sends a message. It also could give him some political capital because he will be holding delegates. Not a bad thing if the primary ends up close enough to use it. Hypothetically (since he is such a longshot) if Paul won, Israel has plenty of sack,plenty of muscle, and plenty more reason to deal with the issue. We would at least want to make sure the Straits of Hormuz are kept navigable if Israel thought they needed to send a powerful message.

Amazing is right. You don't have to listen to much past "Newt isn't just another Washington Insider", hahaha. With the exception of Paul, I don't know of any candidate who doesn't alter their 'beliefs' based on the polls and that should be plane self-defeating if morals or honesty are a major consideration. So maybe people are just incapable of discovering things for themselves and just have to have a nose ring to function, go figure. Just think of the fun we could have hahaha, were we there. Bet we wouldn't get a second question though.

PS: I did not make the title block hahaha. We need our Constitution back, whaaa...

I bet I'd get edited out of the video and you'd get thrown out with police escort