Leauki Leauki

Different Definitions of Terrorism

▼

Different Definitions of Terrorism

from JoeUser Forums

Many liberals use a different definition of “terrorism” than I do. For them the word is related to a cause, for me it’s related to a method.

Hence for them fighting for the cause they agree with, however inhuman and evil, is not “terrorism” regardless of the methods employed.

And for me attacking civilian targets to create fear (”terror”) is terrorism, regardless of what cause is being fought for.

There simply are not many Jews attacking schools and kindergardens in Arab countries because of real or perceived injustice or suffering experienced. But there are many Arabs who attack schools and kindergardens in Israel (and elsewhere). They are terrorists. They seek to create an atmosphere of terror in order to achieve their political goals (i.e. a Jew-free middle east or whatever their current propaganda officially says it is about).

They are too cowardly to oppose a real army and hence resort only to attacking children and unsuspecting civilians. They murder children in front of their parents, NOT because they expected the children to fire at them or because the children were used as human shields by militants firing at them but SOLELY because the children are too small to fight back and are thus an easy target for even the bravest of Arab terrorists.

And they are not very brave. They are only brave when their enemy is weaker. If the enemy turns out to be stronger, they whine and cry and ask the world for help against the evil Israelis, an enemy who at first seemed like an easy target and turned out to be far more difficult to “throw into the sea” than originally thought.

This is the terrorists’ battle strategy:

1. Try to murder children.
2. Wait for Israeli reaction.
3. Try to murder children until Israel reacts.
4. After Israel responds in kind, cry and whine and ask the world for money.
5. Use the money to buy weapons.
6. Repeat.

What heroes! If only they could take violence like they expect Jews to. But they are lesser men than the Israelis.

(Other typical targets of their heroic allies include unarmed black African tribes. Step 4 works so well as the world has lots of money because the world refuses to give that same money to the victims of genocide committed by the terrorists' allies in Darfur.)

 

 

heroes zionist_conspiracy brave_kindergarden_attackers
21,905 views 53 replies
Reply #51 from JoeUser Forums Top

Would it be possible to agree that random stories told by people with an obvious agenda should not be used as evidence?

It's the standard used for everybody else and I don't see why Jews or Israel should be treated any differently.

I assure you that if I saw a video showing Asian-looking guys fighting and somebody told me that this was Japanese police beating up Ainu civilians, I would NOT take that as evidence that Japanese police indeed beat up Ainu civilians, not regularly or ever, or that such behaviour would somehow go unpunished. And I expect the same civility when it comes to Israel and anti-Semitic lies.

Anti-Semitic lies are NOT evidence against Israel or proof that Jews are evil.

 

Reply #52 from JoeUser Forums Top

But leuki, you don't understand... if a middle eastern looking person is beating another middle eastern looking person IT MUST be an israeli soldier/policeman beating an arab civilian in cold blood as part of an organized zionist plot to abuse arabs for no reason whatsoever! why is it so complicated for you to get? [/sarcasm]

PS. 1/3 of israelis are arab, we can't tell each other apart, jews and arabs look the same even to each other.

The video actually devalues what is a horrible and torturous assult, because it couples it with a voiceover of bullshit "facts".

average household is... 3-4 people? so we are talking about 1/3 of all palastinians being kidnapped by israel to be tortured... where they are taken to israel, at a rate of 1 per 2-3 israeli households. Every other house in israel then must hold a palstinian prisoner for torturing. Amazing how not even the BBC, time, or even al jazeera ever made that claim (actually they didn't because they are not that stupid, its easier for al jazeera to tell people israelies steal the eyes of palastinian girls to transplant for rich jews who went blind / or that coca cola is plotting the overthrow of the iranian government, than it is to sell them on the idea that israel is one big giant prison)

Elemental: Reforged
Reply #53 from JoeUser Forums Top

1/3 of israelis are arab, we can't tell each other apart, jews and arabs look the same even to each other.

End of quote

20% of Israelis are Arabs, some of whom are Druzim or Bedouin.

Of the remaining 80% more than half (40% of total) are Jews of middle-eastern origin.

Second-generation Israelis look exactly like local Arabs and Assyrians. And all middle-eastern Jews look exactly like Assyrians and Arabs. Turks and Kurds look different.

The only way to distinguish reliably between Israeli Arabs and Israeli Jews is if the individual in question is black. There are many black Jews in Israel. ("Peace activists" tend to see "Palestine" as a multicultural heaven, but in reality nobody wants to be black in an Arab country.)