Just three simple points. First Michael Moore is being made out to be something he is not. Moore is not an extremist in his liberal views. He advocates the peaceful and constitutional act of voting a President out of office. Personally I believe there is plenty of evidence to begin an investigation for impeachment but unfortunately Congress is controlled by the party of the President so that won't happen. Nor is what Moore accusing Bush of in anyway extreme. Is it really so amazing to think that a politician would look out for the interests of his family and friends first. The fact that Bush has more power than any President in the past 59 years makes it that much easier for him. Power corrupts most men.
My next point can be summed up quickly because there really isn't much to it. The core facts of the movie are solid. No lies are told. Maybe some people can find parts misleading but that's to be expected. Unlike the President, Moore doesn't lie.
And how can I say so confidently that the President lied. Besides the stack of evidence pilling against him and the testimonies of those who served in his administration it is also clear by his own words. One year he says Iraq has no WMD capability the next year he says they do. The intelligence didn't change, but the words coming out of the President's mouth did. And if you say something often enough it can become fact. And that is propaganda. That is what you accuse Michael Moore of. Maybe he got a few pointers from Bush.
