I takes a much bigger man not to go to war than it does to go I find this a bit ridiculous because people were complaining about the sanctions before we even went to war. I've heard people claim that through sanctions we killed thousands of babies and children each year. So, sanctions aren't acceptable,
Bah, both sides do this sort of 'glossing over' of the other's ideas. Bush supporters are moronic, fascist, nazis Kerry supporters are tree-hugging, flip-flopping, wussies who want to make the usa the UN's bitch. There are examples of both (KKK and PETA), but neither are indicative of their respective party platforms. The problem is that each party has let the bulk of their members be painted with such broad strokes, and
[Quote] Just because Al Franken has a radio show, doesn't mean he represents the party. [/Quote] Just like I'm sure Ann Coulter represents the entire Republican party as well. There isn't a law with Edwards and Kerry with why they pay such low taxes. They're part of LLC companies so they get taxed less. It's complicated and kinda boring to explain.
Misguided and uninformed, aren't you making references to the Nazi party existing in the USA? Maybe it is YOU who is the moron?
Tarumigan, what about the first WTC bombings? What about the fact that Sudan offered Osama to Clinton around 4 times? I mean, Clinton obviously didn't take him too seriously, and Bush was probably just following suit. What is ignorant about supporting Bush? He's tried to get our economy out of a recession, and the one-two punch of the Dot-Com collapse as well as the 9/11 attacks makes it difficult to help the economy, little as the government
[Quote] Despite his failure to stop the 9-11 attacks [/Quote] Even though Clinton failed to prevent them during his time period [Quote] We have liberal elitists (anyone with a brain) [/Quote] With attitudes like this can you really be surprised that the Democrats lost this election? Honestly, if you try to convince someone that you're right because you're *obviously* so much more enlightened/intelligent than they are I'm sure
[Quote] There would be if Bush hadn't removed the 3 trillion dollar surpluss of the Clinton administration. [/Quote] This is an untrue statement, because the debt has been growing since something like 1940. Clinton had 'projected' surpluses, that is, in about 10 years he would've had that much if the country stayed at that point. All Clinton did was balance the budget. I just graduated (last year), and the school I went to was horribl
The problem is that the UN never really wants to do anything. The European contries have been so into appeasement that they've spread their influence to other countries and many are now unwilling to take any action against any villain. So I would go so far as to say that the USA isn't the problem, but rather, the other countries who fight action every step of the way are. Anyways, that's my 2 cents on the whole thing.