I bit the bullet a while ago and bought the game through Epic. I could have waited. I have a friend that I play games with regularly. We played GalCiv 3 (through Steam) quite a bit, but it kept crashing late in games, and it would become unplayable after a while. We have been playing Civ 6 for quite a while and wanted to try GalCiv 4. I wish we had saved our money. It crashes earlier and more often than GalCiv 3 and becomes unplayable rather early in the ga
Gerapolean
[quote who="chanbrothers" reply="7" id="3849835"] May I know what is the issue with Epic? I see so many against Epic store. [/quote] Primarily, I don't want another launcher eating up resources, etc., and I already have lots of games that I play through Steam. But I also agree with Kurtis Peterson's other reasons.
I will be waiting to get it on Steam.
Another year and no Linux support. I still don't use Multiplicity for that reason. I only have one Windows box, but I have several Linux boxes.
@emichael, I use Synergy, too. I will until they break it...again...or until Multiplicity is working on Linux. Once Multiplicity is an option, I will drop Synergy in a heartbeat!
I'm interested in seeing Multiplicity on Linux, too!
I had the same thing happen on an initial installation today. Norton Internet Security 29.9.3.13 on Windows 10.
Well, for my part, I purchased GalCiv 1 and will not spend any more money on this series unless multiplayer becomes a part of the game. I spend most of my playing time in multiplayer mode. I understand the cost/complexity issues with multiplayer. What is crap is the excuse that the single player experience would suffer. "Multiplayer mode may significantly change the game experience" or some such line is now displayed on a number of multiplayer games. Some sacrifices must be made to