grillchen

[quote who="Paladin77"] See, it worked. It was not hard and you can say you saw it your self and agree or disagree with me. [/quote]Yes, in a manner. I already had downloaded a copy a while ago and perused it. By the way, you've misinterpreted that section. It says that the average temperature over the period 2011 to 2030 will be 0.64 to 0.69 degrees warmer than the average temperature over 1980 to 1999. The 0.05 is the range in the predictions.

[quote who="Paladin77"] Could you please post the page and the section of the report that this quote is from? Thanks.I could but I won’t because it is better if you read all four reports to keep it in context. I don’t like to cut and paste as much as I had in this article. I only wanted to wet the appetite to get people to actually read what they were defending, rather than the hype from the news media and religious zealots. [/quote]Your prerogative. Of course, there's

[quote quoting="article"] All models assessed here, for all the non-mitigation scenarios considered, project increases in global mean surface air temperature (SAT) continuing over the 21st century, driven mainly by increases in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations, with the warming proportional to the associated radiative forcing. There is close agreement of globally averaged SAT multi-model mean warming for the early 21st century for concentrations derived from the three non-miti

[quote who="chrizzle"]The only "disadvantage" is that legions of lawyers and accountants would find themselves out of work. [/quote] I'm sure they would find lots of work just trying to figure out how to value income and what income is. Let's face it, the ultra rich will always have more resources to reduce their tax burden. Case in point: one of Australia's richest men, Kerry Packer (RIP), would brag that he never paid any taxes. As for wages, the tournament theory likely applie