dan_l

Reply to Is There Another Story Behind the Ground Zero Mosque? in Politics Stardock Forums

[quote]Are you referring to Lula, who posts on here?[/quote] Indeed I am. [quote]She is not Muslim. She is not Muslim. Nor am I Lula. You have a gender ID issue along with ADD (this is not your blog nor is the subject Phyllis Schlaffly - your worst nightmare)[/quote] I'm just pointing out the absurdity of you beefing with muslim folks for advocating quite a bit of the same your beloved christians do. You were the one who brought up domest

Reply to Is There Another Story Behind the Ground Zero Mosque? in Politics Stardock Forums

[quote]Muslims - yea, they do have some nasty laws they seem to want to impose (and have in some cases - NJ domestic abuse???)[/quote] Right. And don't forget 'family values' champion, literally a Lula hero, and Eagle Forum founder who believes that if a husband sexually assaults his wife, "it's not rape". There is consent by virtue of being married. But really: keep your head in the sand on that one. There's absolutely no similarities between the t

Reply to Is There Another Story Behind the Ground Zero Mosque? in Politics Stardock Forums

Charles' comment makes me wonder whether there's an actual push amongst real life new yorkers to push for a zoning change. I know both sides have dancing bears at this point - msnbc had the former SG who's wife was killed in 9/11 and he supports it, and fox ran some clown over the weekend who was a rescue worker and is against it. But I'd be curious to see what the actual beliefs of New Yorkers are.

Reply to Is There Another Story Behind the Ground Zero Mosque? in Politics Stardock Forums

[quote]yea, Sharia law is a bitch, aint it.[/quote] Right. And certainly don't forget the 'family values' types who believe their their god should be setting the rules down here. [quote]All it would take is a change in the zoning of that area and the Mosque is no more so you can't say nothing can be done.[/quote] And we'll grandfather in the OTB and the strip joint? Or what? Kick'em out? [quote

Reply to Is There Another Story Behind the Ground Zero Mosque? in Politics Stardock Forums

Refute? I just don't care. I 'get' the reality here: The mosque - at the very least - is in poor taste, but there isn't anything anybody do about it. Most people, at least those who have managed a C in their high school civics class, understand that there's nothing you can do about it. That sort of situation, in which the irrational types can't compete with what's rational - often results in such conspiracy nonsense---like these clowns who would lov

Reply to Is There Another Story Behind the Ground Zero Mosque? in Politics Stardock Forums

lulz. It's like a Dan Brown article! "Help solve the mystery of the mysterious floors of evil Muslim mosque and the shadowy organizations that inhabit them".

Reply to All of your marriages are belong to the gay 'agenda'... in Blogging JoeUser Forums

------ Why not? The case concerns the practice of homosexuality not the practice of religion. We don't know what religion, if any, Judge Walker practices. Judge Walker's ruling was not about religion but about furthering the homosexual agenda to equate homosexuality with married heterosexuality. ----- So really: by your logic a straight person couldn't really rule on this case either? Do we need asexual judges? <

Reply to All of your marriages are belong to the gay 'agenda'... in Blogging JoeUser Forums

I like how----based on lula's other perfectly rational opinions like 'feminism is trying to make a gender neutral society' and "making the SPLC hate list twice doesn't make somebody a hate monger", she's also an expert in jurisprudence up to and including under what circumstances a federal judge should recuse himself. I also wonder, Lula: Could a Christian rule on this case? No doubt, Christians have a stake in 'protecting marriage'. So c

Reply to FBI confuses Wikipedia with Wikileaks.. in Blogging JoeUser Forums

It's sarcasm dude. Relax. "YEAH YEAH YER BLOG IS JUST LIBERAL JIBBERISH"

Reply to FBI confuses Wikipedia with Wikileaks.. in Blogging JoeUser Forums

// '); tileCounter++; // ]]> <div class="wrp_

FBI confuses Wikipedia with Wikileaks.. in Blogging JoeUser Forums

Or something : The Federal Bureau of Investigation has demanded that Wikipedia stop using the FBI seal in articles on the online encyclopedia, or face possible legal action. According to a letter dated July 28, FBI lawyer David C. Larson said the site is using the seal

All of your marriages are belong to the gay 'agenda'... in Blogging JoeUser Forums

What a great day to be an American . Yeah, the crazy types will take it to the SCOTUS, but let's be realistic: the 'battle' has been over for years. The moment the issue was taken seriously enough generate opposition----it was over. Funny thing about wingnutistan: anytime there's a legal ruling that doesn't go in the favor of the mouthbreathing masses, they're out complaini

Reply to Real American Hero: Phyllis Schlafly in Blogging Stardock Forums

[quote]Laws, policies, ordinances, etc. that condone and encourage homosexuality and other forms of sexual promiscuity are not directed to the common good.[/quote] So wait: you think you and your religion should govern the sexual behaviors of the entire county?

Reply to Real American Hero: Phyllis Schlafly in Blogging Stardock Forums

[quote]Knock, knock Dan. All laws discriminate against behavior.[/quote] Criminal behavior. Being gay is not criminal behavior. Having a gay relationship is not criminal behavior. [quote]Concerning discrimination, first, a quote from Peter LaBarbera, writing for Americans for Truth about Homosexuality" back in 1998.[/quote] BWA HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH You're quoting Labarbera now? Let's ta

Reply to Real American Hero: Phyllis Schlafly in Blogging Stardock Forums

[quote]What happened? Your writing indicates you slept through your religious instruction classes! [/quote] Says who? You? Are you the pope? [quote]Again. Go back to your statement. Yet here, Schlafly was giving her personal pov (of which we both disagree). Was she or Eagle-Forum allowing social conservatives to really hate women? Was she inciting hatred of women? I say no and I also say you haven't made your case. [/quote] Then explain it

Same old, same old from GM in Blogging JoeUser Forums

I really like this article at the NYT, which addresses what I think addresses the nut of the GM issue : It doesn't hit the price point For starters, G.M.’s vision turned into a car that costs $41,000 before relevant tax breaks ... but after billions of dollars of government loans and grants for the Volt’s development and production. </b

Reply to WikiLeaks and the Aghan War in Current Events Stardock Forums

[quote]That is a common misconception. And of course it is wrong. Have you ever seen the Planet of the Apes series? The last one is very telling. The creators were trying to get out of the franchise and so it is sloppy, but has a great sub plot to it.[/quote] [quote]So it was with the Taliban. They hid in Pakistan while the real Afghans died against the USSR. While members of Al Qaeda were part of the fighters there, Al Qaeda was not (they came later).

Reply to Real American Hero: Phyllis Schlafly in Blogging JoeUser Forums

[quote]You know what? It's now evident that you don't know or greatly misunderstand the Catholic Faith. My thoughts on faith as expressed on these JU pages, are in lockstep with 2,000 years of constant Catholic Church teaching. [/quote] Sorry Lula, but you're wrong. 1. You're not God. You're not the arbiter of Catholicism. You're not even able to rationalize your faith into a modern world view. You're so old testament that it's positively laughabl

Reply to Real American Hero: Phyllis Schlafly in Blogging Stardock Forums

[quote]I know who my Lord and God is; and if it is as you say, that your God is not my god, then you are the one who is clearly confused.[/quote] LOL. Don't tell me what my faith is. I don't think I've ever heard of a a catholic church where somebody with your knuckle dragging puritanical thoughts on faith would even be considered to be tolerated. [quote]Then back up your claim with factual proof.[/quote] Lula: what do you think the eagle f

Reply to Real American Hero: Phyllis Schlafly in Blogging JoeUser Forums

Here's more 'truth', 'class' and 'work of Lula's Lord Jesus Christ' from ol' Phyllis: At one point, Schlafly also contended that married women cannot be sexually assaulted by their husbands. "By getting married, the woman has consented to sex, and I don't think you can call it rape," she said.

Reply to Real American Hero: Phyllis Schlafly in Blogging Stardock Forums

[quote]Telling the truth is always a "classy" thing to do. Truly caring for children is always a "classy" thing to do.[/quote] You believe that quote is the 'truth'? You believe that quote indicates that she 'cares about the children'? You're absolutely out of your mind. I am embarrassed for you. [quote]And since you claim to be Catholic your # 3 and 4 comments as well as these above, reveal your lack of the supernatural virtue of Charity

Reply to WikiLeaks and the Aghan War in Current Events JoeUser Forums

[quote]1. Obama gave less than the requested troops and waited 6 months to do it. I guess you forgot that.[/quote] Right. So clearly, not giving in to every whim of the military represents 'playing politics' and not letting the 'generals fight the war' their hands? [quote]2. Show me where McChrystal requested an out? Or is that just another one of your DNC talking points?[/quote] So how do you explain it? come on now. Let's hear

Reply to WikiLeaks and the Aghan War in Current Events Stardock Forums

Ohhhhhh man. It seems like Obama Derangement Syndrome is getting stronger and stronger in DG every day. [quote]Instead of allowing the generals to fight it, he first picks a political one to fight it, undercuts his own pick, fires him for nothing, and then replaces him with the Bush General. The last move is the first right one he has made. But then that has just begun, and I fully expect him to undercut Petraeus as well.[/quote]

Reply to WikiLeaks and the Aghan War in Current Events Stardock Forums

[quote]Famous last words from the head dunce himself - Biden, on Iraq. The answer is always divide. Why? Apparently because no one wants to work for anything any longer. They want to sit in eden and be spoon fed.[/quote] What are you talking about?

Reply to Bethesda Softworks' Comes to Impulse! in PC Gaming Stardock Forums

Is bethesda planning on offering any of their non-shivering/non-knights of the 9 dlc's through stardock?