Sounds pretty cool, but I'd also agree that it should be more of a DLC thing. I would rather they focus on the things that affect gameplay first.
27 Replies
71,431 Views
12cfoster
0
Posts
0
Replies
1,518
Reputation
As a side note, you might want to use http://pastebin.com/ for really long error reports. It's like an online notepad and comes with a unique link per paste so you don't even have to sign up.
8 Replies
10,334 Views
[quote who="Gaunathor" reply="23" id="3455136"] Quoting 12cfoster, reply 22No, there are some descriptions for alpha techs. Fate is correct. I just researched the Life Support techs in my game. None of them had a proper description. I even looked in the game-files, just to make sure, that I didn't misremember something.[/quote] Well, I remembered seeing it in the tooltip for the tech, but now it appears that the tooltip is for the sensor tech, a bug.
27 Replies
106,362 Views
No, there are some descriptions for alpha techs. Fate is correct. Re: Distance. One of the first things I did was add in a 250% range penalty to all races, since I play almost exclusively on Immense.
27 Replies
106,362 Views
[quote who="glennstephenspress" reply="4" id="3454693"] It gives a free survey ship. Read the pop-up when you explore it.[/quote] That is a different anomaly. There is the teleport anomaly, and the free survey ship anomaly (where a survey ship pops out of a wormhole).
6 Replies
3,019 Views
Considering how big space is in the first place, I find it more awkward that there is something in the way that I can't go around. If you want water or soemthing to be an obstacle play Civ with no boats.
27 Replies
106,362 Views
Fair, though they do have at least black holes planned according to some of the xml files, which might cover number three.
27 Replies
106,362 Views
Reply to
Is it really supposed to cost 600 billion credits to capture an enemy colony????
in GalCiv Beta Feedback
GalCiv3 Forums
GalCiv3 Forums
I didn't actually notice until recently. Tourism seems to pay enough to cover all expenses for me.
17 Replies
4,604 Views
Guys, it is alpha, they don't even have particle effects in yet. Leave pretty for later.
27 Replies
106,362 Views
Encountered that problem as well. It was kind of funny, seeing my terran colony ship, an iridium colony ship, and an altarian colony ship all parked next to it trying to colonize.
7 Replies
3,432 Views
Take a look here: http://steamcommunity.com/app/226860/discussions/2/558751812946655067/ Mormegil has a comment on this a bit down.
2 Replies
2,469 Views
I can't play the game yet due to bugs and I still don't mind paying the $99. Guess what? You don't have to pay, you can wait. I paid that much, not because of the 'free stuff', but because I like the company.
23 Replies
94,883 Views
[quote who="God_Smith" reply="21" id="3452567"] On a completely unrelated bug, I can no longer run GC3 (crashing on note from devs) so am unable to change the resolution [/quote] Welcome to my world. Hopefully our stay won't be long.
38 Replies
12,621 Views
[quote who="God_Smith" reply="6" id="3452440"] Switched on my graphics card, game loaded and did not crash - however it moved most of the text off-screen. [/quote] Did you do anything special to get it to not crash?
38 Replies
12,621 Views
If they use the same form of AI, the AI actually calculates it's turn during yours. That might explain some of it.
5 Replies
5,092 Views
Same issue, turning off GelUI, Enable Bloom, and Ambient Occlusion options in the Graphics settings removes the white boxes, but leaves no background or other objects aside from the tooltips and side menu. This is with my graphics card off, using only the integrated graphics. Turning on the card results in immediate crash after the intro movie.
38 Replies
12,621 Views
GMT -6 for me, usually most active around 18:00 and later into the night.
35 Replies
55,637 Views
I download just fine with firefox.
217 Replies
80,419 Views
Ugh, please no 3D maps, sure it is realistic, but the added axis just serves to make things ugly. I've yet to see any game pull off a 3D map that looks as coherent as a 2D map. The thing that gets in the way of looking at the map is the map itself.
57 Replies
51,055 Views
I just sell them anyways. It's like free money falling into my lap.
13 Replies
28,183 Views
I'm just going to point out that right now they don't have plans for this. Not that they never will add hot seat. There is such a thing as trying to implement too many new features at once. Especially if a problem is bigger than you thought it would be.
68 Replies
259,413 Views
[quote who="Gaunathor" reply="26" id="3427708"]Even though the devs have already said that this is not going to happen? [/quote] Whats a little thing like word of Devs to stop anyone? [e digicons]XD[/e] Especially since they have already changed their minds about things (Totally acceptable at this point, being pre-alpha).
68 Replies
259,413 Views
I also am wondering how the Iridium Corporation is different from the Korx... That aside, the map picture is drawing most of my attention. It appears to contain a nebula in the bottom right as well.
80 Replies
211,428 Views
[quote who="Martok" reply="34" id="3418693"] Quoting Tyrantissar, reply 33 If tactical battles are implemented, everyone is forced to be tactical. Why? What's stopping people from simply choosing to auto-resolve if they wish? [/quote] Because either the Auto-resolve is better than you at tactical battles, in which case it would be most efficient to always Auto-resolve, or worse than you, in which case you should never aut
93 Replies
392,104 Views
I routinely play long games where I reach the end of the tech tree. I play on Immense, abundant planets and stars, tight clusters, very slow research, and I gave every race a -250% range penalty and de-emphasized the life support techs a bit. This makes your initial range about the size of your homeworld's influence. However, the thing about simply adding more techs is that you will reach the end of those too, and then want more. Instead, I'd rather have s
21 Replies
105,564 Views