Well will know more about why Iraq was invaded in the future. Perhaps there was a better ulterior motive.
jeremyshaw
You do realize, as long as the DPRK exists, there is just another defensive shield around PRC? If the USA is tied down in South Korea (more likely, due to how quickly they are likely to be owned) or Taiwan (less likely, due to a wierd string of death around the world - la fayette), the more protected PRC is in actuality?
Well... North Korea probably already knows this, and despite everything, Kim is no dimwit (like someone...) and are laboring under the presumption of defeat. Any likely adding more clorine into their artiliary shells. Sounds to me like a sound arguement for just posting a few SSBN near the Socialist Workers' Paradise.
Well... you never know what US weapons were there...
Well... in any chance, how about a nice first strike?
Well... How come Iran was there? I know it's wierd now... but the Iranian President in 2004 was VERY pro-US. Then Bush said something (probably a mistake) and he was really quickly out of power by the hardliners. Now we got this wierd guy with missles, nukes, and Kilo class subs.
Wow... and words will win wars? If it's anything like the last Korean War, DPRK troops don't stand a chance.
How in God's green Earth did North korea get those printers!?
Well, lets just agree on this: Firebombing may be bad (or worse, as some of you seem to say), but it took hundreds if not thousands of brave bombers to bomb Tokyo to the ground. It only took one (unassailed) bomber to reduce Hiroshima to rubble. Now, nukes are ALOT more power then they were in 1945... You wanna see what they mount in subs nowadays? There is no way we ever really would know what happens in Kim's government. Even when his regieme falls, few secrets will