No Napolitano could not appoint a democrat she must appoint someone from the Republican party because 1 she has to I can't remember where I saw it and 2 she would never win the senate race she might be planning for and it would ruin her credibility
Yeah all those people who say that Richardson is "Judas" which is idiotic. The man along with fmr. gen. Jones are my top two because both help obama considerably.
I think Obama needs a military guy or Bill Richardson. Wesley Clark would be great becasue 1 he's a Hilary man 2 he's got a military record matching McCain The other military guy is James L. Jones another man matching McCain on military and he is an unknown personality (Obama anyone) which fits perfectly in his campaign Richardson fits perfectly with foreign policy experience and the vice-presidential debate never actually matters, they have the television audience of
Hey Island Dog being liberal is one thing being irrational is another. Liberal is not a bad thing it's zealots like TP who exist on both sides of almost every issue and party that are... "Destroying the fabric of society" sorry but thanks to previous responses we can sleep well knowing you will never be taken seriously with anyone even when your own precious Democrats (which I am one) laugh everytime you post something because you spout out crap like this. LOL
[quote who="shortyjjb9"] but I dont want to get in a religious debate. [/quote] Your entire position is based on religion and that is the only reason this topic has become an issue in america today. Also you talk about conception well it's not like if they are married all of a sudden a sharp decrease will happen in babies born each year. So yeah why does homosexual marriage matter it doesn't affect your busineess, religious, or normal day life why does it matter?