[quote]Hannity and colmbs is not a news show,[/quote] What's the name of the channel again, the Faux NEWS channel?
The_Politico
[quote]BTW how is the Democratic Presidential candidate going to squirm their way out of appearing on Fox news during the run off?[/quote] They will be busy appearing before REAL Americans on channels that aren't biased.
[quote]just think of what the next 4 will be with a clod or a bitch at the helm.[/quote] We are in the middle of having a clod at the helm and as for a bitch, don't forget the Nancy Reagan presidency. She was the one running the White House while Ronnie was drooling, forgetting his name and soiling himself during his second term.
[quote]As usual, far left liberals like yourself result to insults after being caught in lie after lie in other threads.[/quote] As usual extremist anti american rightwingers like yourself result to lying about what you allegedly caught me doing in other threads. Dr. Guy has already admitted he believes his low IQ invalidates the facts that I post.
[quote]I guess she has licked her wounds from her devastating defeat and decided to crap on our blogs again with her foul mouth and inane comments.And no content.[/quote] This isn't a blog you moron, its an internet board. There is a difference Dr. I wishIwasaguy
You've already proven that I answered it. I accept your admission that you lied.
[quote]The bigots for profit[/quote] So the Republican party is changing its name?
[quote]Good news. Now all we need is a federal law requiring ID's to vote[/quote] Except the logic of the argument for the law is flawed, there were NO incidents of voter fraud prosecuted related to incidents at the polls in Indiana. There WERE incidents of voter fraud prosecuted involving absentee ballots which do not require ID's. Kind of like how Republicans lie about the border fence being anti terrorism while ignoring the fact that the only recorded incident of a terro
[quote]As the election year drags on, I have actually begun giving strong consideration to voting for a candidate I would have never considered. While I disagree with many of his ideas, it is quite possible (depending on the LP candidate) that my vote may go for Ralph Nader. Why is this? First of all, integrity. While I don't fall for the "Chicken Littles" of this world, Nader is at least a true believer. One who takes his responsibilities seriously. You can use a lot of adjectives to descri
[quote]If you're going to insist on childish insults i[/quote] Its only an insult if its not true. Everything I have stated about you is a fact. [quote]I'd be willing to match IQ test scores with the likes of you any day of the week.[/quote] You better bring nine or ten to add together so you can have a prayer of being equal to mine.
[quote]Arguably according to WHOM, precisely?[/quote] Any patriotic American.
[quote]d they would get rid of mine.[/quote] Who told you that the faux noise network?
[quote]Nuclear Anhilation is change[/quote] And pretty much the only change GW seems to be working for.
[quote]W isn't a conservative[/quote] Actually a lack of intelligence, complete unwillingness to address anything not fitting their preconceived nations and low morality is indicative of all conservatives.
[quote]t I've heard people wanna vote for Dubya in the upcoming elections.[/quote] Anyone dumb enough to have voted for GW even once deserves to be branded with an M for "MORON" anyone dumb enough to have voted for him twice deserves to be tried and convicted of treason. Anyone still dumb enough to have the right to vote permanently stripped from them and any children unfortunate enough to be their kids.
[quote]Did not stop Mickey Moron.[/quote] So you think they should be forced to spend their own money to release a film that the films author, a lifelong republican, admits is filled with anti democratic lies and fabrications?
[quote]He should drop out NOW.[/quote] That argument makes NO sense. Allowing spoiled children to get their way is how we wound up with GW, easily the worst president and arguably the worst person in the history of the country.
[quote]This is in part because the problems with the economy have a lot to do with worldwide trends and not just national ones.[/quote] Having a brainless idiopathic idiot who doesn't give a damn about anyone worth less than a million dollars is a "worldwide trend"?
[quote]Add to all of this the cost of funding a national health care plan[/quote] and forgetting the costs associated with there not being any national health care plan.
[quote]eem to forget that one of the major cuts at play here is the $1000 per child tax credit.[/quote] And you seem to "forget" that the Democrats have called for not only extending that credit but actually increasing it.
[quote]All of the Dems begging for ending the Bush tax cuts[/quote] For MILLIONAIRES.
[quote]When you post to a blog, your words are written down and you only look like a fool for trying to lie about them.[/quote] And yet you continue to lie. Why is that?
[quote]You have yet to answer the question.[/quote] Actually I answered it multiple times. You continue to insist the fact that you lack the intellect to comprehend the answer prevents the answers existence.
[quote]Yup, Obama is about "hope" and "change" all right. He "hopes" no one notices that his "changes" are nothing more than "from each according to his means, to each according to his needs". Barack "Marx" Obama... well, he's ashamed of his real middle name, maybe he'll be proud of this one ;~D [/quote] And Bush hopes that nobody in the media accidentally hires someone with the courage to point out the Republican innate belief in the value of fascism.
[quote]How exactly were any of the questions not "legitimate"?[/quote] because they were non issues that nobody with a functioning brain stem would care about.