So what exactly changed with this "Final" version? I was hoping that when their final release came out my computer would actually be able to play some of these dreams and not croak (or croak a bit less). Guess that's what I get for hoping
Yosmel
If you lost your copy of Dynamic Earth, due to this update or otherwise, you can always re-download it by going into your account and finding the list of all your purchased dreams. Once there you will get links to re-download any dreams you have purchased in the past in case you need them again.
holy crap when did Jesus Christ make his way into this thread? And for those that are complaining about a ten dollar price tag... grow up. Either pay the pittance or don't. I don't see a Stardock overlord whipping customers to pay for something they don't want to. Frogboy once said that if 10 dollars is too much for you to afford, then you are simply NOT the target audience for Stardock's products. I really don't see how it gets any simpler than that. If by chance you *still* don't get
Ignorance is Bliss? Jesus I find myself saying that everyday now, it seems.
Your OPINION of Dreamscenes is 1 things...FACTS are another... I've said this before, and quite frankly some of you are probably tired of it but I'll say it again... Ignorance is Bliss.
Yeah I'm pretty tired of hearing people put Vista down with little to no experience with the OS it's self. It amazes me how easily people can be swayed to say such things without actually trying it with a completely open mind. I'd swear that over 75% of people that say comments like Vista = ME have either never touched it or went out and bought (or downloaded) the 64-bit version without knowing a thing about it - lo and behold when nothing works because they stepped into a word they were not pre
I wouldn't count on it, or even have a small glimmering light of hope tucked somewhere inside of you - but I suppose it could happen... someday...
Completely agree with the posts above. The windows ultimate web page hasn't seen any updates for months - at the very least the staff there could use the blog on the site to let us know things are still going (that is, if the staff is even still there... which I am beginning to believe is a real possibility)
Glad I could be of help then, however small it may have been
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong here, but technically Blissful Dream isn't "dynamic" in the way that some people may be thinking. Blissful dream is only a regular old dream with time triggers built into it. Sure, this may be called dynamic (and indeed it is), but there is a big difference from this and dreams such as Desktop Earth and Desktop Collage. Desktop Earth, for example, is completely rendered from your video card on the fly when you select it. All it is is a 3D rendered
If you contribute a good amount of content to this website you will eventually earn the Master rank, which will allow you to sell your dreams through this website much like Stardock is doing right now.
meh, Dreams are awesome but Vista is crap, without a port of this for XP I just can't see it going anywhere soon. Unless the only thing you do on your PC is customize your desktop, then going Vista just doesn't make sense. I have used it in the office and the performance is terrible, and with Window Blinds on XP my PC looks just as good if not better and runs alot smoother on a similarly specced machine. So then the only thing Vista offers is Dreams??? And pretty much
Neil - I just loaded Expanding Shapes again to take a closer look and see what about it I didn't like, and I can honestly say I don't exactly know! The colors, the shapes, not enough movement, maybe a little bit of all of them? I really can't pin it down. It's one of those cases where you just look at something artistically and don't enjoy it as much as the next. That being said I did not and will never say or imply that your work is or ever was of poor quality. I can probably speak for a lot of
I have to agree with vStyler. How many times have we all eaten out at a restaurant and not liked the food you ordered? Depending on the restaurant you might have easily spent over 10 dollars (I know some who wasted over 30 when dining in more expensive restaurants). That's just the way things are, unfortunately. We don't complain to the restaurant manager because the food didn't fit your tastes. We just don't eat the food and move on with our lives. I don't see how purchasing a premium dream her
Tripdog - I understand where you're coming from, and you make a very, very valid point. I guess the only thing I can suggest is to follow Stardock's advice and compare their premium dreams with their free dreams, since the quality and general performance are always quite similar. As for the dynamic dreams, I don't think I've heard of one NOT working for someone (or at least not to the point that Stardock's tech team cant fix it once the person goes through the proper channels) Please correct me
Hopefully this post will end this silly demand for a "try before you buy" version. Quite frankly, it's old. So without further wait I will quote Frogboy on his thoughts about this matter (and there are many) which can be found if you dig around this forum. Believe it or not, this has already been debated and the issue shut. -------------------------------- I would purchase a 2007 car if it were 5 dollars without driving it. I also routlinely buy drinks and food out at restaurants
I have this gut feeling that said picture dream will be a tad different from the one posted just recently, meaning it will be another 9 bucks. *shrug* Tdieckman - I have no reason to believe that Stardock would outright decline a .dream purely because it is similar to a .dream that they have in the works. Now if someone were to create an exact duplicate (or close enough) to, let's say, Desktop Collage, with absolutely nothing to set it apart from the former Stardock .dream, then I would
I don't see how a missing feature such as folder scanning "defeats the whole purpose" Sure I agree that having the .dream scan folders for new images would be nice, but saying or implying that excluding this feature kills the entire point or worth of the .dream is where I would have to disagree.
Personally I knew this dream was going to get a triggered update because I spoke with Brad directly and he confirmed it for me. When I saw the dream again on the recent list I immediately went and downloaded it through my account page. I can honestly say, however, that were it not for Brad's confirmation a few weeks earlier in another topic that I would be a little confused as well. We're all guilty of rushing through things before, and I believe that Jedi's original post didn't quite
FYI I'm using a 7800GTX... maybe it's a problem with the 7000 series then? I honestly have not tried to downgrade my drivers ever since I encountered the problem (which was right after my upgrade from 100.65 to 158.18) but I know that all the dreams were working just fine then. Perhaps I'll try that and report what happens when I get home later tonight (I'm at my college library atm)
Thats just the problem RottGutt, there are no newer video drivers. You can relax now, though. There is absolutely nothing wrong with your machine or the .dreams that are giving you problems. IF you absolutely want to use these .dreams in question then I suggest simply downgrading your drivers and I can almost guarantee it will work properly. The drivers before the most current Nvidia drivers (Forceware 158.18) worked perfectly for me. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I think they were forcewa
How long has this been going on? It might just be your video driver (especially if you're using Nvidia) I don't know about anyone else, but with Nvidia's newest masterpiece of a driver many dreams are just unusable. I get this green garbage on my screen that has countless artifacts everywhere. Maybe this is what you mean by "4-color" mode? or maybe I'm completely wrong...
As far as I know the dream maker does not include the ability to make dynamic content yet. Stardock is currently working on an API to correct that. And incase you're wondering (as many of us have at one point or another) Niel Banfield is an artist working for Stardock, meaning he has free access to any currently unreleased software and thus we see a lot of dynamic content from him. All there is to do now is wait. Soon all the wonderful artists here will go on a wild rampage a
The chances of a dream that will change when it rains right outside your door.. also practically non existent Ok maybe I should rephrase my statement, then. A dream that will literally check if rain is falling outside my doorstep - yes you're quite right chances are practically nonexistent. A dream that will check an online weather service and display the day's weather based on, oh let's say a zipcode - completely possible and quite frankly just a mat
Correct me if I'm wrong here anyone, but hasn't this idea been practically promised with the dynamic dream technology? From what I've read on the whole dynamic dream business, it could almost be said that it was built to make a dream that would change throughout the day and even check a local weather service and accurately reflect that on the dream as well. To be honest this is exactly what excited me the most the first time I actually did some reading on deskscapes several we