Stegasword

Reply to It's not the car you drive, it's the gallons you burn in Politics JoeUser Forums

Silly people. Regardless of your drive a very high MPG car is smart common sense and good for the enviroment. Driving a vehicle that gets 16-18mpg just because you have a 5 mile commute is a weak spin attempt to try and justify an excessively wasteful lifestyle. I drive a $4000.00 car I paid cash for that gets almost 40MPG not because I can't afford a Mercedes but because I want to minimize my impact on the environment and I don't want anyone to eve

Reply to It's not the car you drive, it's the gallons you burn in Politics JoeUser Forums

I'm no environmentalist. I'm just pointing out the guy seems to feel guilty and wants to post more about it so he can try to feel better about himself. I hate wasteful people, but I have a certain tickle now when I see people with gas hogs and SUV's filling their tanks for $90 at the station. But draginol is what most people call a evergy hog, he consumers more energy and is more wasteful than 10 combined families in the United Kingdom, and seems pr

Reply to It's not the car you drive, it's the gallons you burn in Politics JoeUser Forums

This is a silly attempt at justification of ones own excess. Imagine if you drove those 6 miles to and from work, and had a car that got 35+ miles per gallon. Being wasteful is being wasteful, regardless of the extent you are being wasteful. That is something that cannot be justified.

Reply to Being a customer is a two-way street in WinCustomize Talk JoeUser Forums

Any business that doesn't adhere to the "Customer is always right" is a flawed business filled with charlatans, and they don't get a dime from me. I'm a demanding customer, to get my money, I expect the utmost in respect and quality service, otherwise my money goes bye bye.(and in this economy, every customer counts) Each and every customer someone pisses off is amplified 1000 times because of the internet, and worse, you risk creating a legion of pe

Reply to Point amnesty now.. in Blogging JoeUser Forums

I feel a rating should make u first say why u rate good or bad in a short explanation. Then admins see WHOM u thought u were rating and WHAT. Makes it harder on automated repeat ratings after deleting cookies. Even if u junk up the explanation box artificicially, that is transparent then. They could sort of rate or premonitor th

Reply to Point amnesty now.. in Blogging JoeUser Forums

The system will be flagging users whose calculated new scores are FAR less than what they had on here. At that point, we'll likely look at exactly how that happened and put in major penalities for those users. Anyone who emails me on the subject saying what they did and how they did it will be granted amnesty. <

Reply to Partners vs. lone founders in Business JoeUser Forums

The site goes on, some customers will make lotsa noise for a few weeks and it will all die down and things will return to normal. Jarks fanboys will moan and complain, people will threaten to start their own version of the site, and legal threats will fly. But at the end of the day, I bet nothing happens and in a few weeks nobody will care. Much ado about nothing.

Reply to Show us your computer setup in Internet JoeUser Forums

All have 19" 12ms LCD's, premium sound and speakers, and the works. PC1: Intel P4 3.6Ghz, 1024MB PC3200 CL2, 6800Ultra-OC Graphics Card. PC2: Intel P4 3.4Ghz, 1024MB PC3200 CL2, 6800GT-OC Graphics Card. PC3: Intel P4 3.0Ghz, 1024MB PC3200 CL2, 6800GT Graphics Card PC4: Intel P4 2.8GHz, 1024MB PC3200 CL2, 6600GT Graphics Card PC5: Intel P4 2.6Ghz, 1024MB PC3200 CL2, 6600GT Graphics Card