That's a good point. Would the Democrats have demanded multiple recounts if they had originally won the election? if you lost a very, very important race like this unfairly, would you let it slip?
And demanding recounts until the numbers appear in your favor isn't stubborn? No, it's making the results fair. What I about Republicans is that they get mad when the Democrats try to make an election fair. I'm not saying that all the votes were counted correctly, that is almost impossible. I'm saying
3rd count: hand recount where votes can be altered or "found" by making marks on ballots, interpreting marks on ballots that shouldn't be there, etc. There's a reason we typically use machine counts - because humans don't trust other humans. Either way, this race is well within the margin of error, and it should be
Any time it takes 3 counts to get numbers that give you the results you are looking for, there's no "fairly won" about it. 1st count: machines cause almost 2000 voting errors. 2nd count: Machine recount: only some machine errors are fixed. 3rd count: hand recount: all votes correctly counted. <br
So you have no problem with a Democrat stealing an election and having the Democrats that control the state congress helping them do it? seems like you republicans don't care when one of you steals an election. And who said "stole"? I said "fairly won"
First, I wouldn't count on that win standing. It's most likely gonna be challenged multiple times, as it took at least 2 challenges to the original count to get the count to favor the Democrat, including magically "finding" some 700 lost votes in heavily Democratic King County. It seems that whenever there are recounts, es
I just love this. does anyone remember the forum that said Dino Rossi had won the Washington Governors seat? And all the Republicans were celebrating because they had "won" by 42 votes? Well check again, because Christine Gregoire has just won Washington state's Governor's office in the hand recount.
Japan never threatened us but Iraq did. Excuse me, when did Iraq threaten us?
sure, the greatest president in history killed thousands of innocent iraqis and americans, went to iraq for something that didnt even exist, declared mission accomplished when we hadn't even accomplished our mission, is still there even a year after declaring mission accomplished, ruined the environment, created a huge budget deficit, caused the dollar's value to plunge, lost jobs, won't admit he's wrong, has two whole 365 day calendars of stupid thing
Reply #1 By: UBoB - 12/14/2004 8:28:56 AM Ahh! and so it begins. The master plan is put into action. Slowly we are inching towards creating the 2 new countries of North America.....The United States of Canada and Jesusland. So you saw that too. Link
hmm, I'm thinking more along the line of, oh, maybe Clark or Edwards (or once the country's ready for him kucinich) but Dean? now really, think about what your'e saying.
"Yet again, if a Democrat loses, we see that they will demand recounts until they get the results they seek. The numbers above were from the most recent recount, but obviously those numbers can't be right (at least in Democrat's minds) as they didn't result in a Democratic win. As noted, they will now be seeking a hand recount so that they can demand to see each and every vote and try to devine what the voter really wanted. On the more am
well, you know what, I could do the samee thing with Kerry and have just as good excuses as you had. He lied about his Vietnam Service: no he didnt. he's a flip flopper: how could you say such a thing? he wants to raise taxes: so? that's basically what your saying to defend Bush.
by the way i beat him on crippling
for all you people who think reagan is unbeatable, listen to this. I beat him with 443 electoral votes. without cheating. with a custom candidate (no maxed out stats). How? i built hqs in california, texas, new york, florida, pennsylvania, illinois, ohio, michigan, and georgia. then, I got all the win endorsements besides NAFTA (he got it first) then I went to all the swing states and dropped a couple of smear mercheants and spin doctors, then spent th
hey im with you all the way. though im still pissed that bush won. viva 2008, baby!
no, thts not what im saying at all. god, why can't you people take an insult and just let it go! aaarghh!
1. im not yet old enough to vote, but if i was (next election) i would vote for gregoire, who is the democratic candidate.
its called typing shorthand. heres just a few things for you. b4= before, omg=oh my god, lol=laughing out loud, rite=right, lemme=let me, so on. uncle sam
I live in washington, so this affects me more than most people. I cant believe how close it is. on nov 4th gregoire was ahead by 18000 votes! (though thats not TOO much...)
allrite, if u dont get it, let me be frank. I was saying that we attacked iraq to get rid of a bad leader (saddam) according to bush. thats why osama attacked us. to get rid of bush. do i have to explain every insult to you?
so lemme get this straight, it was rite to attack iraq because we needed to get their wmd's. but there weren't any... o wait, thats rite, thats what bush said b4 we attacked. after he said it was to get rid of there bad leader. now i think i kno why osama attacked us...
thats were they don't understand, republicans do whats RIGHT not whats POPULAR. and this is a fact and not an opinion because.... uncle sam
evan trivett, when did people respect bush? people egged his limmo when he was going into the whitehouse on inaugoration day in 2000, he lost the popular vote in 2000, and only won because he "won" florida by 538 votes. only 538! (not counting all the people whos votes wer denied) and the iraq war is the most unpopular war ever. nice try. o, and its unpatriotic to say bad things about bush, well that makes perfect sense, and i suppose its unpatriotic n
i agree w/ whoami bush sucks so bad hes the worst pres ever. did u ever stop to notice he's the only president ever to lose jobs, he attacked iraq, but we got attacked by afghanistan, none of the al queda people were from or in iraq, with the money he's spent on the war we could feed, clothe, and house all the homeless people in the world, he has increased the debt more than any other president ever, he hasn't vetod a single bill, he sent afghani peopl