Most of it has already been said. Both Don (#9) and Daiwa (#11) have pretty much adressed it all. I believe that the real fear is on the part of people who insist that all of scripture is literal I don't know about the fear part, but I always found incredible human arrogance in the belief that
I've seen no evidence whatsoever that the NYT or other liberal-minded press organs have thrown in the towel & are trying to "avoid angering the White House." You mean like Dan Rather and the CBS document fiasco? Odd bit of avoidance.
received a three thousand dollar bribe from Haliburton Since when are campaign contributions bribes? Geez, if this is a bribe what is the $70 million or so Soros spent on the Kerry campaign? So you're assertion is that someone would risk their career for $3000? Seems like chump change, to me, for an at
Do you think for a minute that if there was significant and credible evidence of voter fraud that the media so distraught over Bush's election wouldn't jump all over it? I saw Juan Williams and Mara Liasson on the Brit Hume show. They gave this "voter fraud" subject about 90 seconds of discussion (appa
Bush 282 Kerry 247 Actually it's 286 to 252. If Ohio swung it would be 266 to 272. Not gonna happen, no matter what fringe conspiracy theories are out there (32 days left until it's official)
By no means does the US produce the best in what they do It is the nature of our capitalism that drives people to be the best and I beg to differ. It is those in the US (predominantly) that are the inventors of envelope pushing products. Charles Paulson Ginsburg, born in San Fran - invented the
I don't care which way it goes, I just want to know. It's done. I've followed all the links, this is some incredibly creative wishful thinking. The article you link to cites (and links) another by someone named Tom Paine. Mr Paine then cites the exit polls, does some creative math (and demonstrates a c
First of all your points are well taken (I'd prefer the rift be closed myself, not the policy debate, just the anger) You don't want the opposition to leave as that will only create a most hateful situation because the ones who leave will be the moderates, not the extremists Actually, I don't t
Link 3 shows a total of 7,588,422. Link 2 shows a total of 7,350,900 from all the counties. If you subtract those numbers, there is a difference of 237,522 votes. Where did all the extra votes come from? Somebody please tell me, there might be a valid explanation.... <b
Just to play devils advocate, lets say that information is uncovered that Bush lost Ohio AND Florida due to voting irregularities, if not out right fraud They have to find out, conclusively (not some questionable, massaged, partially scientific analysis), within 41 days after the election (which is when
Marriage will be (and already is) confirmed as between a man and woman (as it is in 17 states so far). Civil Unions (same sex couples right to join) will be passed (in most states) when activists stop insisting on it being "marriage". There really isn't much left to debate.
90 percent of those 40 percent party registrants voted down party lines That's the way I read it also. However, I could not subtantiate the claim, which is why I asked where to find the data set.
The fact that across the country that partsians regularly voted over 90% for their party candidate for President means nothing, huh. I'd like to know where this number came from, and what the standard deviation is (can you direct me to the data set?) <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=cent
Your right, it looks like the Democrats were stuffing the ballot boxes in the larger counties. Seriously, the smaller counties are where the purported anomalies exist both Sumter and Nassau (in E-touch) exhibit similar behavior that is supposedly odd in the Op-scan. I see no reason to expect a correlation between voting pattern and machine. What is more likely is that the "expected" vote numbers were WRONG (much of the whole analysis hinges on t
From Webster’s Not from my Websters, or any other dictionary I can find, online or otherwise. It is interesting that the first definition has added "contractual relationship recognized by law". I wonder if they'll remove the second one once states define it. Guess that just shows that all those people t
I think the Dems need to re-think the whole thing. Not that they will Clinton already told them this (he told Kerry to strongly state he supported Civil Unions and was against gay marriage). Eh, why listen to a two term President though, what the hell could he know?
if someone wants to tell me im wrong,how come everything south of illinois is all red try lukiin at tha cownty by cownty map. the majorety of tha countree is red.
Marriage is not clearly defined. mar·riage n. the state of being married; relation between husband and wife. hus·band a man joined to a woman by marriage; a male spouse. wife A woman joined to a man in
To be expected from the left coast whack jobs at berzerkely. Let's take a collection and buy them one way tickets to wherever they want to go so they'll be happy.
This ain't elementary school people. You know, lately I've wondered. Some of the more recent posts (mostly not from names I recognize, though I've only been around a few weeks) seem like someone, at the local elementary or middle school, let loose the social studies class in the computer lab and directe
Im saying that they are stupid for voting that way AHA.... the truth comes out... it's Theresa Heinz-Kerry posting incognito here.
And the Religous Right shouldn't be pushing it down the liberal states throat by trying to amend constitution or making laws banning all Gay Marriage everywhere. This is the spin from the left. What is marriage currently? A man and a woman. Any law stating marriage as a man and a woman is only stating W
Here is my take on the other side of this debate. Why re-define marriage? Marriage (in it's current incarnation here in the US) is between a man and a woman. Currently, gay couples have, or can have, all the rights of a married couple except the right to leave the partner with the others social security income in the event of one passing away (major problem). If something called a Civil Union gives them this right, is that OK? I have yet to hear (or un
I have a feeling that Rove might have rigged the machines when they had no paper trail in democratic counties in florida. Alrighty then, I could see that, Rove driving (maybe he used a chopper) from county to county covertly rigging the machines. He was pro
The problem for our country is 49% do not want what Bush is selling. Actually (based on initial estimates) about 40% of the registered voter age people in the country didn't even vote. That means only about 19.5% voted against Bush. And your statement assumes that 100% of those were adamant in their vot