grandg

here i am thinking he was a devout muslim... guess not. Link

Found on Google News: Link Oct 14 @ 6:03 pm wtf?

No one is saying Bush did 9-11. But the head of the Senate Intel COmmittee said theatt he "obfuscated" the FBIs investigation. And Ben, come on. First you want me to read a book review article. What? As if that is reliable. Sorry fellas, but I will go with what the NY Times and Wash Post are writing instead of what you are both theorizing. The facts are out there. You can live in a fantasy world where all of the newspapers i

grim wrote: Reason why I take it with a grain of salt, because on the right it shows Clinton to blame Example [LINK], left shows it is Bush, but I put all the blame on the man who sent them, Usama Bin Laden, who is more likely than not DEAD, oh well. ----------------- Finally a statement I can agree with. I also heavily blame Usama bin Laden, but UBL has many friends in the highest of pla

I must ask again, did you read the article? If so, it is not me saying these things. It is the New York Times, Wash Post, LA Times, the Congressional Joint Inquiry into 911, the 911 Commission report, Newsweek, Copley News Service, the WSJ, and similar outlets which are considered the most credible of all sources in existence. If you dont believe the articles from these sources, what do you believe? <br

Ah, no. However It is Bush's fault for directing the FBI to "restrain" and "obfuscate" their 911 investigation into the San Diego cell. Did you read the article at: Link ??? The article confirms that high ranking officals of the Saudi Govt were deeply and directly entrenched in the operation and support of the San DIego terror cell which harbored t

there was an interim FBI Dir. at the time. Obviously the president appoints and the senate confirms. However, Congress and especially the senate intel committee, in their oversight role, would have the same info available to the FBI Dir in their intel briefings.

it is interesting how facts about 9-11 are called partisan. when in fact both parties are actively burying the facts.

Check out chapter 7 of the 911 Commission Report and the notes are also valuable. If you just cross out the doublespeak, you can learn a little about the plot.

Hey there San Diego. First off, regardles of the SD tribunes political leanings, we must look at when this story was written. Just weeks after 911. No one was saying anything about Bush's involvement in the coverup or with the Saudis. The article simply documented what happened and what the FBI's statements were. To say that they wrote this article that early on with malicious intent is speculative to say the least. Also the SD Tribun

Sorry was not clear about the breaking news. This article was published on Oct. 8, 2004.

Alternate Links Link Link

http://www.madcowmorningnews.com/GnG/ShaikhII.html http://www.madcowmorningnews.com/GnG/Shaikh.html It is 100% all quotes from mainstream news articles and it is astounding. Hopsicker has uncovered perhaps the most damning piece of evidence yet concerning the Saudi spy ring in San Diego and Bush's hand in suppressing it. To break down just one piece of what we are talking about: 1) The 2 hijackers in SD lived w