just got this update on sdc but windowfx fails to install. anyone else having this prob? wondering if it is sd or me. error reads > Extract: C:\DOCUME~1\John\LOCALS~1\Temp\sdcentral\Base\broad\bottom.bmp_ 0 (file not found) Result: Installation failed (27)
Wommers
Viewsonic vp201 series here. i like it so much i am actually considering getting a second one for dual display. great for gaming and tv/movies. definitely stick with 16ms response time or less.
Currently driving '02 GTI. Very happy with it. Very fun to drive. It's my 'true ride'. At least until I can afford the new Vette.
desktopsidebar and trillian for sure
thanx meowy
count me in meowy. if there is still 1 out there. [email protected] tia
nice little program called neoshooter on neowin.net. google it
just my 2 cents but why are these 2 new items not configurable to be hidden in sdc? no offense, and i'm sure these are great new additions, but i am not interested in them at this time. if intent was in fact not to let user hide new "shareware" in sdc, then i feel like they are being 'pushed' in the wrong way. hopefully new build of sdc will correct this? <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/sb.g
no problems here.
thanx yrag - i had check for beta ticked. changed it to sdc release and ticked 'prompt before updating' and whadya know, it worked.
component tray showing sdc update but sdc won't update when prompted. before i pull anymore hair outta mah head, is this happening to anyone else?
oops...i stand corrected chris. all 6 groups checked does seem the only way for now.
try deleting dicussion folder and restart sdc. caught it in newsgroups.
oops...that is v1.0.2. i had no problem getting current version from yrag's link. check your internet options.
try this link http://aquaxp.com/download.php
on defense hus, i would move steelers down and rams up. everything else looks good
44 - born in st louis, missouri. raised in springfield, illinois. came to visit tampa, fla in '79 and been here ever since. btw - welcome back iplural.
well now, if bootscreens hadn't been a choice in the poll i guess there wouldn't be this controversy. imo if stardock doesn't intend to create their own boot screen changer then bootscreen section shouldn't even be considered here. as other users have noted, there are plenty of sites out there for the boot screen enthusiast. unless of course this is the only site they are able to navigate to.
rainlendar was my vote in the 'other' category in wc's latest poll. there are plenty enough bootscreen choices on other sites to warrant putting it on wc. imo. as far as bothering to change bootscreen, as brief as it is seen(or isn't), it's still nice to change to complete your customizing experience. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/sb.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmiddle" ALT="Powered by SkinBro
usps - i sort the mail for Woms. aaaalllllllllll night long! now please, no flames for late or damaged mail.
ain't it the truth knatzz. i better slow down now cause between your cooler and my fridge, i'm catchin a pretty good buzz. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/sb.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmiddle" ALT="Powered by SkinBrow
btw - congrats knatzz
mmmmmmmmm....beer (homer's eloquent quote)
they've taken ripped skin off new version(5.1),china. check it outhttp://www.phaseout.net/
don't tell me 49th street for you ip. good luck and let me know if you'll require the infamous cake with file inside. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/sb.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmiddle" ALT="Powered by SkinBrow