MicroMacroBoy

Yes Draginol: I told myself: "Who would Osama vote for?" After answering that question, George W. Bush has my vote again.

Gephardt is cake. I used a shitty custom character but it was still quite easy. As a republican, you are going to have success on issues like War on Terror, War in Iraq, Capital Punishment, etc..flaunt those issues. Build lots of HQ's the first few weeks.. Use your operatives correctly, smear merchants, fixers, and webmasters win an endorsement on war on terror. If tax cuts is huge, get it by the tax payers association, etc ,

Those are pretty slanted. Too slanted to be random quotes. We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." President Clinton, Feb.

I don't see that as having been likely. Bin Laden was not a fan of Saddam Hussein. Is the enemy of his enemy his friend? As far as Saddam and A-Qaida, the links are slim if not there. However, Saddam and Palestinian suicide bombers has been proven. Osama yo momma has said on numerous occasions that he wants: 1) To push Israel into the sea. 2) Rid the "holy land" of western influence, going back in time to a O

As the hegemonic nation, the United States realizes a role in international affairs, just like England. England knows what it is like with hegemonic status, dont forget, the United States in 1800 could be considered to be a "3rd world country" in today's terms. Britain had the power then, and the United States has it now. Britain saw its role in the Middle East as a peacekeeper as well as other things. With the drawing of borders..so does the U.S.

Not really, only because I feel like with less bureaucratic involvement, it is more efficient. The "burden" in lives does basically fall on us, however I think that it would be a lot higher number with other countries' involvement and policial agenda's. Again as G.W. said (not exact, but close I am remembering here): "There is no such thing as national alliance, only national interest"

Of course, the currency of war is American lives, the most important and valuable currency possible. But I can honestly tell you that I believe in my heart that this is the right course of action, factions like Iraq, Iran, North Korea need to be halted; If I honestly thought Kerry would do a better job, I would vote for him, but I dont (also I dont agree with Kerry's economic beliefs). The United N

Our good will and faith in the president that was created by the events of, and directly following, 9/11 have been played on to drum up support for the reckless pre-emptive policies of our president. We have been made to feel afraid so that we would support and not question. Thats just the ironic part. I don't feel afraid with Bush in control. It is not easy for me to trust a government enti

Well, the multiplayer system as a whole is like Africa the way bugs crawl around on it. It looks like those kids in Somalia with flys coming out of their noses. I was on week 6, while my brother was on week 10, playing against each other online. Our connections were still good as we were talking over the phone, and i was able to browse the internet on my ultra fast cable connection. This is great. Try making a game complete before all

Marco: Many public works have been riddin on, hence the "free rider" complex. Whenever Government is involved it generally creates free riders. Example: National Defense: Illegal immigrants get benefits of national defense yet dont pay a dime in taxes.

Well, we all know capitalism benefits society as a whole. Social benefit = Social Cost is the economic principle that drives social benefits as well. Capitalism provides cheaper prices and benefits to all. Socialism and other government controls hurt the economy and the lifestyle of the people it "rules" over. Example: Rent Control in New York City: Many apartment managers had to cease operation because the government installed a pric