In what can only be described as the height of double speak and racism, Democrat black leaders say that pulling out the racism (note: not race) card is OK, if you do not believe as they do:

Black Democratic leaders in Maryland say that racially tinged attacks against Lt. Gov. Michael S. Steele in his bid for the U.S. Senate are fair because he is a conservative Republican.

Does anyone other than me see this as the same excuse that the David Dukes give?  That somehow, now a distinguished politician is being smeared because of his race, and other blacks are cheering it?

What is the difference between what they are saying and what the Aryan Nation says?  Except the color of their skin? (and that is apparently up to debate as well).

I recently wrote an article that said that only liberals are allowed to be bigots and racists.  And along comes the Maryland Democrats to not only support my contention, but to add an exclamation point to it!

How many republicans have participated in the following:

Such attacks against the first black man to win a statewide election in Maryland include pelting him with Oreo cookies during a campaign appearance, calling him an "Uncle Tom" and depicting him as a black-faced minstrel on a liberal Web log.

We had a debate a while back on JU about who the party for civil rights was and who was stonewalling and filibustering against it.  It was the democrats that were the bigots 40 years ago, but as some liberals argued, all those bigots were supposed to have moved over to the republican party.  They forgot Sheets Byrd of course.

Well, this simple little article has laid bare the lies.  The bigots did not move over to the Republicans.  They are still nestled snug in their bugs over in the democrat party!

What a bunch of hypocritical, bigoted fools!  Party of Inclusion?  Only if you kowtow to the new Masters, the liberal elite.

No, Maryland.  Steele is not an Uncle Tom.  You are just looking in a mirror when you say that.