Another absolute waste of perfectly good blogspace.

Reply By: DeferencePosted: Friday, October 07, 2005Another absolute waste of perfectly good blogspace.

geee deference I am humbled by your sarcastic wit, where are you in the list of top bloggers? or top blogspts? oh yeh you do not excist.

I guess if you can't take part in a reasonable conversation, it makes you feel better to pretend you are above it.

Reply By: BakerStreetPosted: Friday, October 07, 2005I guess if you can't take part in a reasonable conversation, it makes you feel better to pretend you are above it.

I can always count on deference much like myrrander to come in my blog and shit in it, then leave in a selfrightous huff.

geee deference I am humbled by your sarcastic wit, where are you in the list of top bloggers? or top blogspts? oh yeh you do not excist.

At least I can spell - or at least take the time and the effort to show some pride in what I write to run spellcheck.

"Moderateman", I don't need the opinion of JU users to know I'm far ahead of you in any capacity. I simply shared my (very reasoned - I might add, Bakerstreet) opinion.

I just show up to JU today and here I see an out of-the-blue post with relevance to... what current event?

If this was posted as political commentary it seems dated at best, if this was meant as satire, it isn't clever but if it was meant as an excuse for die hard bushites to sit around and reminisce old barbs about 'the left', then it seems you've just about accomplished that - an achievement with little value and in my modest opinion - another absolute waste of blog space.

If there was something within the post that was particularly compelling or had some sort of objective endpoint to it I would have let it alone or been glad to take part in the conversation, but when reading it, I'm wondering, "What's the point?" Which leads me to conclude...

...another ABSOLUTE WASTE OF BLOG-SPACE.

Oh yeah, top blogger? I read little whip's very interesting, informative blog that had a point on manipulating the JoeUser point system.

I would assert that it is your myraid garrulous Link
posts that bring up your posting numbers as opposed to any particular majority opinion branding you as a 'top blogger'.




Keep hittin' the tarbaby!

geee deference I am humbled by your sarcastic wit, where are you in the list of top bloggers? or top blogspts? oh yeh you do not excist. At least I can spell - or at least take the time and the effort to show some pride in what I write to run spellcheck. "Moderateman", I don't need the opinion of JU users to know I'm far ahead of you in any capacity. I simply shared my (very reasoned - I might add, Bakerstreet) opinion. I just show up to JU today and here I see an out of-the-blue post with relevance to... what current event? If this was posted as political commentary it seems dated at best, if this was meant as satire, it isn't clever but if it was meant as an excuse for die hard bushites to sit around and reminisce old barbs about 'the left', then it seems you've just about accomplished that - an achievement with little value and in my modest opinion - another absolute waste of blog space. If there was something within the post that was particularly compelling or had some sort of objective endpoint to it I would have let it alone or been glad to take part in the conversation, but when reading it, I'm wondering, "What's the point?" Which leads me to conclude... ...another ABSOLUTE WASTE OF BLOG-SPACE. Oh yeah, top blogger? I read little whip's very interesting, informative blog that had a point on manipulating the JoeUser point system. I would assert that it is your myraid garrulous Link posts that bring up your posting numbers as opposed to any particular majority opinion branding you as a 'top blogger'

wow, deference....what crawled up your sunshine and turned it into rain?

Reply By: DeferencePosted: Friday, October 07, 2005gee's deference I am humbled by your sarcastic wit, where are you in the list of top bloggers? or top blogspots? oh yeh you do not exist.At least I can spell - or at least take the time and the effort to show some pride in what I write to run spellcheck. "Moderate man", I don't need the opinion of JU users to know I'm far ahead of you in any capacity. I simply shared my (very reasoned - I might add, Bakerstreet) opinion.I just show up to JU today and here I see an out of-the-blue post with relevance to... what current event? If this was posted as political commentary it seems dated at best, if this was meant as satire, it isn't clever but if it was meant as an excuse for die hard bushites to sit around and reminisce old barbs about 'the left', then it seems you've just about accomplished that - an achievement with little value and in my modest opinion - another absolute waste of blog space.If there was something within the post that was particularly compelling or had some sort of objective endpoint to it I would have let it alone or been glad to take part in the conversation, but when reading it, I'm wondering, "What's the point?" Which leads me to conclude......another ABSOLUTE WASTE OF BLOG-SPACE.Oh yeah, top blogger? I read little whip's very interesting, informative blog that had a point on manipulating the JoeUser point system. I would assert that it is your myriad garrulous Linkposts that bring up your posting numbers as opposed to any particular majority opinion branding you as a 'top blogger'.Keep hittin' the tar baby!

Once again another jerk missing the point because spelling is much more important than content or a discussion.

What I find amusing is somehow because you can write a better sentence or use grammar better YOU THINK that makes you a better person? PLEASE!

Now who is being the judgemental jerk?

You do not like my blogsite stay the fuck out, asswipe.
and by the way you misspelled myriad... now do not you feel like the loser I think you are?

Hard to correct someone's spelling when you misspell words yourself.

Oh please don't throw me in da briar patch brer rabbit.

#31 by MythicalMino Friday, October 07, 2005

wow, deference....what crawled up your sunshine and turned it into rain?

read my response and HIS SPELLING ERROR. hahahahahah


God is good and punishes the witless.

Once again another jerk missing the point because spelling is much more important than content or a discussion

Yep, I mispelled a word in a post, a far cry from your consistancy.

now...

What is this blog's point?

34 by Deference Friday, October 07, 2005

Once again another jerk missing the point because spelling is much more important than content or a discussion Yep, I misspelled a word in a post, a far cry from your consistency. now... What is this blog's point?

you lost all credibility with me deference when you choose to pick on dumb spelling errors, just leave. once again you misspelled, Misspelled There are 2 s'es in misspell not one.

how does it feel for me to totally ignore anything you type and just point out your failings?

how does it feel for me to totally ignore anything you type and just point out your failings?

I'm unhurt, you, however, must be very familiar with the feeling, why don't you share it with us?

So again, what is the point you were trying to make with this blog?

I must have missed it, somehow, so I'm asking the author? What are you trying to express with this blog?

Anger?

Is it anger?

Hurt?

Why are you hurt and angry 'Moderateman'?

Why do you rail so unseemingingly, 'top blogger'?

You called me on my comment, moderateman, now I'm calling you to the floor - what is your blog's point?

Is there one?

Thanks.

36 by Deference Friday, October 07, 2005

I'm unhurt, you, however, must be very familiar with the feeling, why don't you share it with us?

ohhh another thrust of deferences razor sharp wit, wow I will now totally stop blogging and never ever write anything again.

You sure told me.

You called me on my comment, moderate man, now I'm calling you to the floor - what is your blog's point?

Lets see, do I sit up and beg on command? nope. Do I take orders from anyone here, nope.

I think I will just let you decide, and I shall remain silent about what is the meaning of this particular blog, use that wonderful imagination {you know where you think you run things here}to decide whats it all about.

MM breaks into song. to dreammmmmmmmm the impossible dreammmmmmm to fight the unbeatable foeeeeeeeeeee..

Go tilt at windmills somewhere else Don Quixote.

Deference, go back up, and look at the comments on this blog before you crapped on it. If you thought there was no point to it, why the hell bother to comment?

It's like walking up to someone's table in a restaurant and telling them they are wasting their conversation. Butt the f*ck out of you don't feel you have anything to share. We were talking about the 2008 election before you walked up.

Glad we could prop up your drama queen complex for an hour or two, though. Kudos.

how does it feel for me to totally ignore anything you type and just point out your failings? I'm unhurt, you, however, must be very familiar with the feeling, why don't you share it with us? So again, what is the point you were trying to make with this blog? I must have missed it, somehow, so I'm asking the author? What are you trying to express with this blog? Anger? Is it anger? Hurt? Why are you hurt and angry 'Moderateman'? Why do you rail so unseemingingly, 'top blogger'? You called me on my comment, moderateman, now I'm calling you to the floor - what is your blog's point? Is there one? Thanks.

Take a hike, buttwipe! You have GOT to be the most small-minded idiot I have ever had the NON-PLEASURE of reading.

I don't think they'll make the same mistake again. I could be wrong,

If they dont make the same mistake again, I will be surprised.

At least I can spell - or at least take the time and the effort to show some pride in what I write to run spellcheck. "Moderateman", I don't need the opinion of JU users to know I'm far ahead of you in any capacity. I simply shared my (very reasoned - I might add, Bakerstreet) opinion.

Another spelling nazi!  And one with no sense of humor.  You must hate your life, dont you?  You waste time commenting on something that you find beneath you (as I am sure all of JU just does not measure up to your elitist standards).  And then argue with the people that basically say get a life.

Sad commentary on a miserable person.  You must be a liberal to be that miserable.

Reply By: BakerStreetPosted: Saturday, October 08, 2005Deference, go back up, and look at the comments on this blog before you crapped on it. If you thought there was no point to it, why the hell bother to comment?It's like walking up to someone's table in a restaurant and telling them they are wasting their conversation. Butt the f*ck out of you don't feel you have anything to share. We were talking about the 2008 election before you walked up.Glad we could prop up your drama queen complex for an hour or two, though. Kudos.

I thought I handled the situation quite well baker, but thak you so much for your support

Reply By: drmilerPosted: Saturday, October 08, 2005

Take a hike, buttwipe! You have GOT to be the most small-minded idiot I have ever had the NON-PLEASURE of reading

ah yes here comes the marines.... thanx doc.

Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Saturday, October 08, 2005I don't think they'll make the same mistake again. I could be wrong,If they dont make the same mistake again, I will be surprised.

I will bet, shrillery gets the nod from the left.

I will bet, shrillery gets the nod from the left.

If so, then I will win the bet with Baker.  Altho she is trying to paint herself as a moderate, she is just too loony and slips all too often.

46 by Dr. Guy Saturday, October 08, 2005

will bet, shrillery gets the nod from the left. If so, then I will win the bet with Baker. Altho she is trying to paint herself as a moderate, she is just too loony and slips all too often.

remember my blog see hillery run, I predicted she would make a mad dash for the center long before she started too.

She is about as moderate as Stalin was.

don't buy it. I don't think she's electable. For every smelly hippie that votes for her, five apathetic conservatives will be motivated to vote who usually don't. I don't see her dragging out conservative Democrats, and she'd have to, in droves.

I agree with you on this, Baker. I'm not worried about her because, despite what heavily partisan polls might say, I don't think she'll make it past the primary. If she does, the GOP vote will be so heavy that she'll be steamrollered, and the Green Party vote will be strong enough to split what support she DOES have.

#48 by Gideon MacLeish Saturday, October 08, 2005

agree with you on this, Baker. I'm not worried about her because, despite what heavily partisan polls might say, I don't think she'll make it past the primary. If she does, the GOP vote will be so heavy that she'll be steamrollered, and the Green Party vote will be strong enough to split what support she DOES have.

she will make it throught the primaries gid, the left has no one at all with any appeal.

"If she does, the GOP vote will be so heavy that she'll be steamrollered, and the Green Party vote will be strong enough to split what support she DOES have.

That's why I don't think they'll try it.

She may VERY well be a VP pick, though. Think about it, Cheney wasn't popular either, and would be basically unelectable as a President. The problem is you'd have to have a strong enough candidate running with her so as not to be overshadowed.

My opinion? If Dems think they have a chance of winning without her, they'll pass on her completely in 2008 and offer her Secretary of State once they win. If they are facing a tough fight, they'll put her in as VP with an *extemely* moderate presidential candidate, probably a governor.