Date: January 2009

The Hillary Clinton Whitehouse

from JoeUser Forums
Today Hillary Clinton Officially took office swearing on a copy of Roe v Wade to uphold the office of the President of the United States, at her side Vice-President Bill Clinton.

Her official cabinet list contains the names of.

Secretary of State: Barbara Streisand

Secretary of Defense: Micheal Moore

Secretary of the Treasury: John Kerry

This is what we have to look forward to if we on the right do not elect another Republican President.

A bunch of Sellout America Liberals.
politics
27,894 views 114 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top

Why is everyone always busting on Hillary Clinton's whorehouse!  I mean, since Bill has such a voracious sex appetite, you would think that they would let her have one to cut down on his night outs and the expense!

What?  What is that you say dear?  Whitehouse?  It says Whitehouse? Oh, so it does.

Never mind.

Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top
Why is everyone always busting on Hillary Clinton's whorehouse! I mean, since Bill has such a voracious sex appetite, you would think that they would let her have one to cut down on his night outs and the expense!

What? What is that you say dear? Whitehouse? It says Whitehouse? Oh, so it does.

Never mind.
--- Dr. Guy

Why, thanks, Doc. Now my boss is wondering what I suddenly started laughing at.

Or are you really going senile? (Old folks tend to do that, ya know. I wouldn't know. Still on the sunny side of 32, much less 40).
The Political Machine 2024
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top
Oh, yeah. Insert on the end of that ... Daggum edit link doesn't work. Keep getting ASP server errors.
Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top
I mean, since Bill has such a voracious sex appetite,


As I recall, it was Monica that had the appetite.
Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top
umm, are none of you aware that, even in a joking world, the Next President's term is set to begin January 2009, NOT 2008?

Yeepers, people! lol
Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top

Why, thanks, Doc. Now my boss is wondering what I suddenly started laughing at.

Sorry, did not mean to get you into trouble.

Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top

umm, are none of you aware that, even in a joking world, the Next President's term is set to begin January 2009, NOT 2008?

Shhh!  Blutto's on a roll!

Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top

...had the appetite.


Evil!
Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Friday, October 07, 2005Why is everyone always busting on Hillary Clinton's whorehouse! I mean, since Bill has such a voracious sex appetite, you would think that they would let her have one to cut down on his night outs and the expense!What? What is that you say dear? Whitehouse? It says Whitehouse? Oh, so it does.Never mind.


I do not think shrillery will get the whitehouse, just wanted to remind us righties we better be on point to make sure it does not happen.
Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Gideon MacLeishPosted: Friday, October 07, 2005umm, are none of you aware that, even in a joking world, the Next President's term is set to begin January 2009, NOT 2008?Yeepers, people! lol


picky,picky, but right.
Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top
7 by Dr. Guy
Friday, October 07, 2005


Shhh! Blutto's on a roll!


what mistake? hm???/ I think gid is seeing things... eh eh eh eh evil spud laugh.
Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top

what mistake? hm???/ I think gid is seeing things... eh eh eh eh evil spud laugh.

AH ha!  That is called evidence tampering!

Reply #13 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Friday, October 07, 2005what mistake? hm???/ I think gid is seeing things... eh eh eh eh evil spud laugh.AH ha! That is called evidence tampering!


see I have learned at the feet of sandy berger. I stuffed 2008 down my pants, therefore it does not excist.
Reply #14 from JoeUser Forums Top

I stuffed 2008 down my pants, therefore it does not excist.

Please dont reproduce it then!

Reply #16 from JoeUser Forums Top
I don't buy it. I don't think she's electable. For every smelly hippie that votes for her, five apathetic conservatives will be motivated to vote who usually don't. I don't see her dragging out conservative Democrats, and she'd have to, in droves.

My prediction is that if Hillary runs, it will be the first election in a long time to break the 70% turnout mark, maybe higher. She is loved by some, and hated by many. If Democrats who lean right weren't persuaded to vote for her, she'd not have a chance.

I think you'll see the opposite. I think you'll see a more moderate Democrat next time. I think it will be a lot like the Bush Sr vs. Bill Clinton election. They'll pick someone with a 'down home' attitude, easy going, and no big agenda that seems outside the system. Granted, once they are in we'll see just how liberal they really are, much to our dismay.

Look for a democratic governor next time. If you want to be REALLY paranoid, imagine what would happen in McCain jumped ship... and anyone who wants to seem outraged at the thought isn't going to get much play from me. IMHO, McCain constantly proves he isn't above such a thing.
Reply #17 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Friday, October 07, 2005I stuffed 2008 down my pants, therefore it does not excist.Please dont reproduce it then!


already did it has twins so its no 4018and still no dems in the whitehouse.hahahaha
Reply #18 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: BakerStreetPosted: Friday, October 07, 2005I don't buy it. I don't think she's electable. For every smelly hippie that votes for her, five apathetic conservatives will be motivated to vote who usually don't. I don't see her dragging out conservative Democrats, and she'd have to, in droves.


I agree baker.. hillery is not acceptable to anyone with one braincell, but then wierder things have happened.

think you'll see the opposite. I think you'll see a more moderate Democrat next time. I think it will be a lot like the Bush Sr vs. Bill Clinton election. They'll pick someone with a 'down home' attitude, easy going, and no big agenda that seems outside the system. Granted, once they are in we'll see just how liberal they really are, much to our dismay.Look for a democratic governor next time. If you want to be REALLY paranoid, imagine what would happen in McCain jumped ship... and anyone who wants to seem outraged at the thought isn't going to get much play from me. IMHO, McCain constantly proves he isn't above such a thing.


any ideas on who from the left fits that bill that is also a serious candidate?

Look for mc cain or guilliani to run away for the right.

I personally will vote for the MODERATE from either party.
Reply #19 from JoeUser Forums Top
Bill Richardson is someone you hear whispered about, and he is certainly a possibility. I think another name you'll be hearing someday is Jim Doyle.

I have a half written blog on who I think might get the nod in 2008. They have options, there's no doubting it. I think we have a lot more chance of being blindsided by an ultra-Liberal in moderate's clothing than Democrats have to worry about the reverse.
Reply #20 from JoeUser Forums Top

any ideas on who from the left fits that bill that is also a serious candidate?

Bill Richardson.

Reply #21 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply By: BakerStreetPosted: Friday, October 07, 2005
Bill Richardson

Damn!  Beat me again!

But I do have to disagree with you Baker.  If the left was sane and rational, that is what they would do.  But read the Daily Kos or DU.org and you will see that the controllers of the democrat party are anything but sane and rational.

Reply #22 from JoeUser Forums Top
I don't think you give them enough credit, doc. I think they went with Kerry in the last election because they felt Bush was going to have a hard time. They know how hard it is to get an entrenched Senator into the white house.

Frankly, if you had asked me how the election would go for Bush, I wouldn't have said he would win by as much as he did. They thought they had a really unpopular president, and it was their chance to slip in a legislator who would normally be hard to elect.

Wasn't that the exact same mistake the Republicans made with Dole? They thought all their muckraking with Clinton during his first term was enough to make people overlook decades of political manuvering in Congress. It isn't. I think the decisions they've made so far have been based upon believing their own propaganda.

I don't think they'll make the same mistake again. I could be wrong, but I think the next time you see the Dems or Republicans nominate a Congressman, it will be when both sides do so. Otherwise, you are running with two strikes against you.
Reply #23 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: BakerStreetPosted: Friday, October 07, 2005Bill Richardson is someone you hear whispered about, and he is certainly a possibility. I think another name you'll be hearing someday is Jim Doyle.I have a half written blog on who I think might get the nod in 2008. They have options, there's no doubting it. I think we have a lot more chance of being blindsided by an ultra-Liberal in moderate's clothing than Democrats have to worry about the reverse.


will look forwaed to reading blog.. thasnx for the heads up.. will check out doyle.
Reply #24 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Friday, October 07, 2005Reply By: BakerStreetPosted: Friday, October 07, 2005Bill Richardson Damn! Beat me again!But I do have to disagree with you Baker. If the left was sane and rational, that is what they would do. But read the Daily Kos or DU.org and you will see that the controllers of the democrat party are anything but sane and rational.


one can only hope the left stays true to form and serves up another east coast LIBERAL.
Reply #25 from JoeUser Forums Top
don't think they'll make the same mistake again. I could be wrong, but I think the next time you see the Dems or Republicans nominate a Congressman, it will be when both sides do so. Otherwise, you are running with two strikes against you.


time will tell baker, time will tell.