What about conquering starbases

from GalCiv2 Forums
ON Galciv -2 can the starbases be conquered without them dissapearing after you overtake a star system?
43,344 views 39 replies
Reply #1 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
allistic starbase/defense/conquer events?
Start11 - Customize the Start Menu and Taskbar in Windows 10/11.
Reply #4 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
"http://images.stardock.com/gc2/smiles/Congrats.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmiddle">
Reply #5 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
I really like that idea. It would make protection of starbases much more important, since it would not only be lost, the enemy would also reap the benefits of that base.

Morten
Reply #6 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
a certain hull class can invade a starbase rather than destroy it; the rationale being that large ships will have marine detachments et al. to invade.
Reply #7 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
on ship would just add to micromanagement.

Paul.
Reply #9 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
owners. Then the stabase would need to regain a certain number of hitpoints before another could try to caputre the structure, if an attack is attempted before this number is reached the starbase is simply destroyed.

Just my two cents
Reply #10 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
ace to get your SB working again. So, decisions, decisions...
Reply #11 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
flexability. Do you wish to risk the starbase fully recovering in a couple of turns but a possibility of capture or just destruction. Sometimes destruction is the best course if there is little hope of holding it.
Reply #12 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
d theme park near them. See? We know how to have fun. Come join us and have some more. You'll like it. "
Reply #14 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
it really be fun to see your carefull expanded starbase turned against you as oppossed to just blown up? I personally believe not.

Paul.
Reply #15 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
tions.

From a fun factor, I think it could be more fun. At worst, it will be the same amount of boring as world tile management is going to be. Not a whole 'nother kind of boring, as it is now (and that isn't being changed).
Reply #16 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
er which won't be fun. I'm on the fence with this one.
Reply #17 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
antities of the required materials to support such a huge starbase.

Paul.
Reply #18 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
We won't be having star bases be conquerable. It would create way too many game play changes that we wouldn't be able to see the potential side effects of.
Reply #21 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
y concerned with having fun. We each have our own idea of what fun is. And that, I respect. I respect arguments that it wouldn't be fun. However, I think the potentional fun with this is significant enough it should be considered.
Reply #22 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
that it should help the AI out. But I don't know the particulars of your AI, so that's just a guess on my part.
Reply #23 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
nus associated with the resource.

I build starbases for the functions and bonus they provide NOT to duplicate what I can do on a planet.

Paul.
Reply #24 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
in the game. Only what is more fun.
Reply #25 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
base mining that resourse.

Changing starbases to planets changes their function and lessens the fun for me.

Paul.