Bill Clinton is my Hero
That's my story and I'm sticking to it
So what if he liked his winky sucked...don't all men?
Give the brother a break....What didn't you like about the Clinton administration Peace or Prosperity?
That's my story and I'm sticking to it


| Bill Clinton ADDRESSED the problem in rwanda....however, Reagan did not Address the problems in Africa. |
| Reply #3 By: alison watkins - 1/26/2005 6:25:18 PM Bill Clinton ADDRESSED the problem in rwanda |
| I remeber Ronnie not giving a rats a** about the rest of the world when he was president. |
Reply #9 By: thatoneguyinslc - 1/26/2005 6:35:09 PM Bubba went in and put a stop to that trina. |
As for Rwanda, Clinton addressed it by saying we would only intervene in situations that were in our interest. He ordered his staff to not call it "genocide" in press conferences, because it would have required us to interevene by UN standards. He sat back and let 800,000 people be killed. He, himself, admitted that had he interevened probably half of them wouldn't have died. I stongly suggest you watch the documentary: Frontline: Ghosts of Rwanda.
As for the economy, Bill Clinton had nothing to do with all those jobs being created, they were the result of the tech boom. I'd love for you to explain to all of us how a President conjurs jobs out of thin air. Unless you really do believe that his administration "invented the internet", I dunno how you can give Clinton credit for all those jobs.
CONGRESS raises the federal minimus wage. I suggest you look at The US Department of Labor FAQ.
So, if you think Clinton is a hero for taking credit for the tech boom, allowing 400,000 people to die needlessly, and signing his name on a Congressional minimum wage increase, great for you. I, personally, don't.
| " I remeber Ronnie not giving a rats a** about the rest of the world when he was president." |
Evidently you weren't old enough to remember. Reagan was constantly criticized for taking too much of an interest. Our involvment in the Middle East, and balancing the Soviet Union at the time was huge. Libya? Grenada? Lebanon? You obviously don't even know your anti-Reagan propaganda...
| " Bubba went in and put a stop to that trina. |
I guess you aren't famliar with that conflict either. You aren't aware that the UN and the US sat back for years while ethnic cleansing was going on, as Sarajevo was butchered, as Red Cross aid drops were used as bait by snipers. In the end, we waited until almost everyone was finished, and then wandered in with the UN, like always. Also, Clinton had a lot to do with the escalation there by supporting Iranian involvment.
If you are going to be Liberal, maybe you oughtta get in the loop.
So, 200,000 people die between 1992 and 1995 in the Balkans before Clinton finally decides to do something. 800,000 people die in Rwanda... and Clinton NEVER does anything.
That's a million or more people, and you are trying just to slip past it and poke at Reagan? Clinton wrecked himself, he doesn't need "righties" to do it. You think PBS is right wing?
He didn't DO ANYTHING. You can't credit him as a humanitarian, you can't credit him with the jobs that came with the tech boom, you can't credit him with Congressional minumum wage hikes. So, if "Good President" means a do-nothing that takes credit for things he had little to do with, kudos, you nailed it.
I mean, my GOD, the man ordered his staff NOT TO CALL IT GENOCIDE... Here's Clinton being Clinton:
| "In a speech that month to U.S. Naval Academy graduates, President Clinton said "Whether we get involved in any of the world's ethnic conflicts in the end must depend on the cumulative weight of the American interests at stake."" |
That was while hundreds of thousands of people were being killed and mutilated. Nice. It's pathetic when people stoop to revisionist history to prop up their ideology.
The point here was Clinton is some kind of hero, which he most assuredly isn't. Not even close.
| Reply #21 By: thatoneguyinslc - 1/26/2005 8:13:39 PM And actually the point was he is a hero to the author, and i happen to agree with her.I think it was you who came in and turned it into a character assassination attempt. As usual. |
| " And actually the point was he is a hero to the author, and i happen to agree with her.I think it was you who came in and turned it into a character assassination attempt. As usual." |
No character to assassinate. The reasons she stated for his being a hero are bogus. If someone said Hitler was their hero for defeating alien invaders from Neptune, I'd feel compelled to chime in. The exagerattion here is about as annoying...
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.