Moderateman Moderateman

No wmd in Iraq

▼

No wmd in Iraq

The Left rejoices

from JoeUser Forums
Ah yes the left is now Jumping with joy... There is happiness in mudville today.

Many "I told you so's" are flying.

The cia reports the search of wmd in Iraq is over.

Well my question is WHERE ARE THEY THEN.?

Instead of rejoicing, the search should be intensified, to dismiss the idea saddam had wmds is folly.

I for one want to know what happened to all those chemical weapons.

Anyone that had been through basic training {boot camp} has experenced what it is like to breathe a very mild chemical weapon
{tear gas} to think that other much more toxic chem weaps are on the loose is damn frightening.

While the left is whooping it up laughing I sure hope they do not have to experence what it is like to have your lungs burst, eyes bleed, vomit blood and become a victim of this terrible weapon.

For anyone to believe saddam had no wmds is insane. but then thats what I have been saying all along, the left is completely out of touch with the harsh realities of life.

I wonder what the left is going to say if a wmd is released here in america?

I can hear it now, well bush was asleep at the switch again, the left will just not accept any responsibility for anything.

So whoop it up while you can lefties, while the american people are in peril.

Then remember to say< well I thought all along there were wmds, Bush should have searched harder, put more people on
the case. After all I did proclaim saddam has wmds all along. At this point all "dementia" from the left would disappear, as they once again accept no responsibility for anything.
politics
9,938 views 34 replies
Reply #26 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Thursday, January 13, 2005When people start throwing around names of other countries with WMD, they need to remember...1) WMD was just one of the reasons given by Prs. Bush to go back into Iraqand more importantly2) None of the other nations brought up in this type of discussion continuously broke a ceasefire agreement with the U.S.We took it seriously enough to turn over all occupied areas and assets of Iraq back to the Hussein regime and redeploy home.The UN took it seriously enough (at least at first) to officially endorse it.Apparently Hussein only took it seriously long enough for us to leave.Last I checked, a broken ceasefire agreement has always been justification for a return to hostilities. If it isn't, then the ceasefire agreement isn't worth crap and we should never enter into them again.


again I reiterate.... the left conviently forgets evrything THEY said and agreed with before the war.... the left are the utimate masters of 20/20 hindsight.,..
Reply #27 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Thursday, January 13, 2005When people start throwing around names of other countries with WMD, they need to remember...1) WMD was just one of the reasons given by Prs. Bush to go back into Iraqand more importantly2) None of the other nations brought up in this type of discussion continuously broke a ceasefire agreement with the U.S.We took it seriously enough to turn over all occupied areas and assets of Iraq back to the Hussein regime and redeploy home.The UN took it seriously enough (at least at first) to officially endorse it.Apparently Hussein only took it seriously long enough for us to leave.Last I checked, a broken ceasefire agreement has always been justification for a return to hostilities. If it isn't, then the ceasefire agreement isn't worth crap and we should never enter into them again.


there ya go ted typeing common sense to the lunatics........ its like pissin INTO the wind.. altho ya get the pee out, ya wind up with it all over ya..
Star Control: Origins
Reply #28 from JoeUser Forums Top
no one doubted they were there


Not true. Many did doubt they were there (UN France, Russia), that was the problem the US had. Everyone knew Saddam once had WMD, knew their was no concrete proof that it had all been dsetroyed, but were not sure he still had any. The US could not convince countries like France and Russia that any were still there. If you recall the French president went on US TV and said that he knew Saddam once had WMD but that he had seen no proof that he currently had them.

Paul.
Reply #29 from PolMach Forums Top
again I reiterate.... the left conviently forgets evrything THEY said and agreed with before the war.... the left are the utimate masters of 20/20 hindsight.,..


with intelligence the administration asked the intelligence community to color so the obvious reaction would be WMDs. people were fired in the intelligence community because they did not want to play along. the administration conveniently scheduled hearings to look into whether the administration ordered the intelligence community to give only information that backed their thesis until after the election. As it looks now, I haven't heard anything as to whether they ever will convene. How convenient. You can claim the Dems are using 20/20 hindsite. I will counter that Republicans choose to ignore the problems and stay the course.
Reply #30 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: whoman69Posted: Friday, January 14, 2005


will counter that Republicans choose to ignore the problems and stay the course.


I will see your "counter" and "raise" you Unpatriotic left blather.
Reply #31 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: SolitairPosted: Friday, January 14, 2005no one doubted they were thereNot true. Many did doubt they were there (UN France, Russia),


yet aLL of the above intelligence agencies has info that he {saddam} had wmds..
Reply #32 from JoeUser Forums Top
As stated, all of them KNEW saddam had WMD (before 2003). They knew how much he had. They knew what had been accouted for. They just did the math and presumed he still had the missing quantity. In 2003 however there was no proof. The Fench president for example stated that he had seen nothing from his intelligence agency showing that Saddam currently had WMD (in 2003).

Paul.
Reply #33 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply #29 By: whoman69 - 1/14/2005 8:54:03 AM
again I reiterate.... the left conviently forgets evrything THEY said and agreed with before the war.... the left are the utimate masters of 20/20 hindsight.,..



with intelligence the administration asked the intelligence community to color so the obvious reaction would be WMDs. people were fired in the intelligence community because they did not want to play along. the administration conveniently scheduled hearings to look into whether the administration ordered the intelligence community to give only information that backed their thesis until after the election. As it looks now, I haven't heard anything as to whether they ever will convene. How convenient. You can claim the Dems are using 20/20 hindsite. I will counter that Republicans choose to ignore the problems and stay the course.


So according to *you* the Bush administration told *British Intel* what to think and say also? What a crock!
Reply #34 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply #32 By: Solitair - 1/14/2005 12:12:34 PM
As stated, all of them KNEW saddam had WMD (before 2003). They knew how much he had. They knew what had been accouted for. They just did the math and presumed he still had the missing quantity. In 2003 however there was no proof. The Fench president for example stated that he had seen nothing from his intelligence agency showing that Saddam currently had WMD (in 2003).


The math for the most part was considered proof enough.