AOLer thread

I tpyed in "kona is a idiot" and it translated "kona is a idiot"

damn

#1 by Kona0197 - 12/26/2003 7:01:41 PM I tpyed in "kona is a idiot" and it translated "kona is a idiot

How are you today?

HOW R U 2DAY?!??!?!? OMG WTF

If AOL is for 12 yr. olds then I guess that MSN is for pre-school kids

Translation

IF AOL IS FOR 12 YR!1!!! OLDS THEN I GUES TAHT MSN IS FOR PRE-SKOOL KIDS

Hey! I resemble that remark!

H3Y!!!! OMG I R3S3MBLE TAHT R3MARK1111!!!! WTF

Force-carrying particles can be grouped into four catagories according to the strength of the force that they carry and the particles with which they interact. It should be emphasized that this division into four classes is man-made; it is convenient for the construction of partial theories, but it may not correspond to anything deeper.

brings back

FORC3-CARYNG PARTICL3S CAN B GROUPAD IN2 FOUR CATAGOREIS ACORDNG 2 TEH STRANGTH OF TEH FORCA TAHT THEY CARY AND DA PARTICL3S WIT WHICH THAY INTERACT1!!1! OMG IT SHUD B AMPHASIEZD TAHT THIS DIVISION IN2 FOUR CLAS3S IS MAN-MAED IT IS CONVENEINT FOR DA CONSTRUCTION OF PARTIAL THEOREIS BUT IT MAY NOT COR3SPOND 2 ANYTHNG DEPAR1!!!!11

It won't help me in school
[Message Edited]

2 B OR NOT 2 B TAHT IS TEH QU3STION
WHETHAR TIS NOBL3R IN TEH MIND 2 DA SLNGS AND AROWS OF OUTRAEGOUS FORTUNE
OR 2 TAEK ARMS AGANEST A S3A OF TROUBL3S
AND BY OPOSNG END THEM?!!??!???

AOL sucks.

AOL SUKS!11!1! WTF

I hate both AOL and MSN. Both ISPs are for stupid people who don't know how to use the internet.

I HAET BOTH AOL AND MSN!11!! WTF BOTH ISPS R FOR STUPID P3OPLE WHO DONT KNOW HOW 2 US3 TEH INTERNAT11!111 OMG WTF

bit harsh on stupid people aren't we

I hate both AOL and MSN. Both ISPs are for stupid people who don't know how to use the internet.

careful Tech. Some of us use MSN and AOL. I use MSN just because they are the only DSL provider around here but I do not use the MSN browser.

Sorry but that is how I feel about AOL and MSN. If it is possible to connect to MSN without using their browser and software by just setting up a dail-up or DSL connection manually, then I would say that MSN is better than AOL. AOL forces their idiot-proof software on it's users.

SORY BUT TAHT IS HOW I FEL ABOUT AOL AND MSN!!!!!1!1 OMG IF IT IS POSIBLE 2 CONACT 2 MSN WITHOUT USNG THERE BROWSER AND R BY JUST SETNG UP A DALE-UP OR DSL CONECTION MANUALY THAN I WUD SAY TAHT MSN IS BT3R THAN AOL1!11! OMG WTF AOL FORCES THEYRE IDIOT-PROF R ON ITS USARS!11!1!! OMG WTF



[Message Edited]

If it is possible to connect to MSN without using their browser and software by just setting up a dail-up or DSL connection manually,

How in the hell do you think I connect to the web? I use IE 6 and just set up xp to run through the MSN DSL modem.

No MSN software is installed on the computer at ALL.

um ooops
[Message Edited]

No MSN software is installed on the computer at ALL.

That is an important advantage over AOL to me. AOL will only run if you use their idiot-proof software, therefor it is only for idiots.

TAHT IS AN IMPORTANT ADVANTAEG OV3R AOL 2 ME11!!1! WTF AOL WIL ONLY RUN IF U USE THEYRE IDIOT-PROF SOFTWAER THEYRE IT IS ONLY FOR IDIOTS1111 OMG WTF

That is an important advantage over AOL to me. AOL will only run if you use their idiot-proof software, therefor it is only for idiots.

I could have told you that. There is a guy here at WC that pays 2 bills for his high speed AOL. He pays AOL 10 bucks for AOL then 20 to the cable company for his cable internet. Maybe someone should tell him in lamens terms that all you need for high speed internet with a cable modem is a browser.

For the record, the only thing that says MSN around me is the actual DSL modem from microsoft. I hate MSN software.

He pays AOL 10 bucks for AOL then 20 to the cable company for his cable internet.

I don't understand the whole getting broadband then ordering an AOL subscription to run on the broadband. I guess some brain dead AOLers cannot get any use out of broadband if they don't have their idiot-proof AOL broswer, e-mail, and whatever else.

idiots need idiotproof software. given the vast amount of idiots in the world its no wonder aol exists

don't understand the whole getting broadband then ordering an AOL subscription to run on the broadband. I guess some brain dead AOLers cannot get any use out of broadband if they don't have their idiot-proof AOL broswer, e-mail, and whatever else.

exactly. In fact if you go to AOL.com they offer a 9.95 rate if "you bring your own" broadband to the show. Idiots!

idiots need idiotproof software. given the vast amount of idiots in the world its no wonder aol exists

"lamens" = "layman's"

Though if you are using AOL 'lame' isn't far off

It appears that you are displaying numerous wallpaper images  and skins on your site originally created by authors other than yourself.
Although images are freely available for download on the Internet, they are EXPRESSLY for personal use, which does not include the reproduction and redistribution of them via another site such as yours.
The modification, and/or re-distribution of  an artist's images without his/her express permission is in violation of the Artist's Copyright, and is pursuable in law.

Whether these images link to the original artist's site or not, or whether the Original artist is credited or not, without prior permission to display such, you are in violation of inherent and/or expressed copyright.

I strongly suggest you remove any such images for which you do not have permission to display via verification of aurthor, and minimize the potential for litigation against you and subsequent claims for loss.

I await your favourable response.

Paul Martin
Jafo
[Admin...Wincustomize.com]
[Admin...Pixtudio.com]
[Senior Member...Deviantart.com]

IT APEARS TAHT U R DISPLAYNG NUMEROUS WALPAEPR IMAEGS AND SKINS ON UR SIET ORIGINALY CRAAETD BY AUTHORS OTH3R THAN UR1!!!1 IMAEGS R FRELY AVALEABLE FOR DOWNLOAD ON DA INTARNET THEY R EXPR3SLY FOR PERSONAL USE WHICH DOAS NOT INCLUDE DA REPRODUCTION AND REDISTRIBUTION OF TH3M VIA ANOTHER SIET SUCH AS UR!!1! WTF MODIFICATION AND/OR R3-DISTRIBUTION OF AN ARTISTS IMAEGS WITHOUT HIS/H3R EXPRES PARMISION IS IN VIOLATION OF TEH ARTISTS COPYRIGHT AND IS PURSUABL3 IN LAW

WHETHER!!!111 OMG THESE IMAEGS LINK 2 DA ORIGINAL ARTISTS SIET OR NOT OR WHETH3R TEH ORIGINAL ARTIST IS CREDIETD OR NOT WITHOUT PRIOR P3RMISION 2 DISPLAY SUCH U R IN VIOLATION OF INH3RANT AND/OR 3XPR3SAD COPYRIGHT

I1!!11 STRONGLY SUGAST U RAMOVE ANY SUCH IMAEGS FOR WHICH U DO NOT HAEV PERMISION 2 DISPLAY VIA V3RIFICATION OF AURTHOR AND MINIMIEZ DA POT3NTIAL FOR LITIGATION AGANEST U AND SUBS3QUANT CLAMES FOR LOS

I11!!11 WTF AWATE UR FAVOURABLE RESPONS3

PAUL!1!1!!!! WTF MARTIN
JAFO
[ADMIN.WINCUS2MIEZCOM]
[ADMIN.PIXTUDIOCOM]
[SANIOR!1!!!!!1!!11!!1111 OMG MEMBR.DEVIANTARTCOM]!11!!!!!1!!1111!!1 OMG WTF

Gee...that second one might get heeded...not....

The sad part is after a while you can read and understand all this stuff

Yes, Fuzzy....yer r17e.

We been hangin' with the rong doods 2 long....