hello? devs?

is anything being done to fix the multiplayer issue anytime soon or is it completely being ignored by devs? you really need to stop advertising this game as a multiplayer game, this is why my family and friends bought several copies, only to be let down and pissed off because we spent hundreds of dollars on games we can't play together. is anything being done? anyone working on this issue right now? if not, is there some way we can get our money back for buying all these games?

 

please stop advertising this as a multiplayer game until it is or face a law suit.

25,202 views 36 replies
Reply #1 Top

Unfortunately you've just learned an important lesson about buying games: Research first, purchase second.

There's been no word on fixing MP, and no word on improving it in the expansion. As I said recently in another thread: Stardock doesn't "get" MP.

Reply #2 Top

breaking news people!!

 

op is an idiot

Reply #3 Top

I think that he has a fair point.

If what you mean is: "there is no multiplayer option whatsoever," you need to update the game on Impulse. If I recall correctly, multiplayer was enabled shortly after release.

If what you mean is: "multiplayer isn't very fun," well then you should know that making a bad game isn't a crime. And yeah, it's helpful to read reviews before purchasing a game. Otherwise, you have to expect a poor one every once in a while.

Reply #4 Top

Quoting Tridus, reply 1
Research first, purchase second.

Didn't the great sage Mike Brady admonish: "Caveat Emptor?" It was the prodigal son Greg aka Icarus who did not heed his father's wisdom.

sorry...couldn't resist;)

Reply #6 Top

Multiplayer works.  Could you be specific about what doesn't work?

Also, don't threaten lawsuits, that's asinine.  

Reply #7 Top

Technically he threatened "Law Suits" not "Lawsuits", so I'm pretty sure that he is making threats of a fashion faux pas if you don't fix multiplayer!!!!  

 

Reply #8 Top

Careful Brad:

He sounds serious!

And as for the OP, Stardock advertise the game as having a multiplayer component.  It does.  There is no "False Advertising" regardless of it's functionality in your particular situation.

If you want it fixed, post some helpful information.  If not, sod off.

Reply #9 Top

Saying that WoM multiplayer "works" is like saying that a car missing the drivers side door "works". It's a technically accurate statement that leaves any customer who falls for it seething with rage.

Quoting ZehDon, reply 8

And as for the OP, Stardock advertise the game as having a multiplayer component.  It does.  There is no "False Advertising" regardless of it's functionality in your particular situation.

If you want it fixed, post some helpful information.  If not, sod off.

What, you mean other then the lack of quests, tactical battles, co-op, mods, custom sovereigns, large maps, true LAN play, and the inability to build stuff?

That's been done, and the answer has been "oh we're not doing that stuff in MP, go away". At this point I don't have much sympathy for people who still buy it for MP because ten seconds of research would reveal just how bad that portion of the game is, but the drastic difference in tone Brad takes between the SP problems and the MP problems is very telling.

Reply #10 Top

Quoting Tridus, reply 9
Saying that WoM multiplayer "works" is like saying that a car missing the drivers side door "works". It's a technically accurate statement that leaves any customer who falls for it seething with rage... At this point I don't have much sympathy for people who still buy it for MP because ten seconds of research would reveal just how bad that portion of the game is, but the drastic difference in tone Brad takes between the SP problems and the MP problems is very telling.

I have no sympathy for someone who takes the time to post about the games problems, when entering the game's name into Google would've revealed that these problems exist in the first place.  In today's world, there is no excuse for not researching your purchases.

Reply #11 Top

Quoting Tridus, reply 9
Saying that WoM multiplayer "works" is like saying that a car missing the drivers side door "works". It's a technically accurate statement that leaves any customer who falls for it seething with rage.


Quoting ZehDon, reply 8
And as for the OP, Stardock advertise the game as having a multiplayer component.  It does.  There is no "False Advertising" regardless of it's functionality in your particular situation.

If you want it fixed, post some helpful information.  If not, sod off.

What, you mean other then the lack of quests, tactical battles, co-op, mods, custom sovereigns, large maps, true LAN play, and the inability to build stuff?

That's been done, and the answer has been "oh we're not doing that stuff in MP, go away". At this point I don't have much sympathy for people who still buy it for MP because ten seconds of research would reveal just how bad that portion of the game is, but the drastic difference in tone Brad takes between the SP problems and the MP problems is very telling.

Well by some of the standards here, Starcraft 2 multiplayer is "broken too" (of course, there are people on the blizzard forums making that claim all the time).

Multiplayer was never ever promised (or envisioned) to be simply the single player game but with multiplayer. Deal with it.

Reply #12 Top

Whoa!   Look at that butt on that Law Suit.   I wouldn't wish that fate on anybody.

Reply #13 Top

Quoting Frogboy, reply 11

Well by some of the standards here, Starcraft 2 multiplayer is "broken too" (of course, there are people on the blizzard forums making that claim all the time).

Multiplayer was never ever promised (or envisioned) to be simply the single player game but with multiplayer. Deal with it.

Comparing Starcraft 2 to WoM's multiplayer is such an outrageous comparison its hard to believe anybody serious would make.

Also, you're at least partially wrong. WoM multiplayer was in fact planned to have mods, according to you. It was also supposed to support 32 players, which also clearly never happened.

So whatever the "plan" was, it changed at some point. Nowhere was it said "oh all this stuff we've been talking about for the past year, yeah none of that exists in MP" until release. Since then it's been pretty well completely ignored.

As I said, I don't feel any sympathy for the OP because at this point WoM is a known commodity. But your attitude on the subject has been exactly the same as it was for the first few days of WoM's release where it was "no it's fine, there's no problem, go away." It's pretty clear that interest in supporting MP was lost at some point, but it was already announced so the whole thing couldn't just be left out.

Next time, if you're going to half-ass it like this just don't bother doing MP at all and do everyone a favor.

Reply #14 Top

Quoting Tridus, reply 13

Quoting Frogboy, reply 11
Well by some of the standards here, Starcraft 2 multiplayer is "broken too" (of course, there are people on the blizzard forums making that claim all the time).

Multiplayer was never ever promised (or envisioned) to be simply the single player game but with multiplayer. Deal with it.

Comparing Starcraft 2 to WoM's multiplayer is such an outrageous comparison its hard to believe anybody serious would make.

Also, you're at least partially wrong. WoM multiplayer was in fact planned to have mods, according to you. It was also supposed to support 32 players, which also clearly never happened.

So whatever the "plan" was, it changed at some point. Nowhere was it said "oh all this stuff we've been talking about for the past year, yeah none of that exists in MP" until release. Since then it's been pretty well completely ignored.

As I said, I don't feel any sympathy for the OP because at this point WoM is a known commodity. But your attitude on the subject has been exactly the same as it was for the first few days of WoM's release where it was "no it's fine, there's no problem, go away." It's pretty clear that interest in supporting MP was lost at some point, but it was already announced so the whole thing couldn't just be left out.

Next time, if you're going to half-ass it like this just don't bother doing MP at all and do everyone a favor.
I really shouldn't need to make a response like this on Stardock forums. The fact that I do brings great sadness to me. But here we go:

 

u mad 

Reply #15 Top

yeah we all had high hopes for multiplayer.  only stardock knows at this point the plans they have for it.  maybe they want it to fade from memory, or maybe they have bigger plans.  i wish someone would just post the plans they have, like it or not.  its the speculation that's driving me crazy.

Reply #16 Top

I didn't have high hopes, I didn't care.  I wish that it never would have been conceived or implemented at all.

Reply #17 Top

Quoting Frogboy, reply 11

Well by some of the standards here, Starcraft 2 multiplayer is "broken too" (of course, there are people on the blizzard forums making that claim all the time).

Multiplayer was never ever promised (or envisioned) to be simply the single player game but with multiplayer. Deal with it.

It's true that Blizzard decided to make their officially ranked multiplayer ladder games quite different than what you find in the single player campaign.  There are units, upgrades, and all sorts of different things that they left out of ladder matches because they didn't balance the game around those units.  However, this only refers to officially ranked games.  In custom games, anything goes.  One can play a game with whatever units or settings that one wishes in custom games in Starcraft 2.  There are custom games available on Battle.net that make use of everything from the campaign.

Reply #18 Top

Yes, please Frogboy, don't try to re-write history.  You promised a number of things with multiplayer and you didn't deliver.  It's one thing to look forward to a much better game in FE.  But don't try to pretend that you didn't drop the ball majorly with WoM's MP.  I can see now why people believe it would be better for FE to go without MP than for it to be stuffed up like it was in WoM.

Best regards,
Steven.

Reply #19 Top

What I want in a MP mode is quite simple for a game like this:


The ability to play a modded (MP games need modding to deal with exploits) SP game with or against a friend or friends without disconnects.

Elemental didn't really provide this.  (lack of mod support in MP, lack of stability apparently also)

 

That said, the game has to be worth playing SP, for it to be worth playing MP

Reply #22 Top

looks like a drive by posting, no sign of op.

 

good riddance.

Reply #24 Top

wow...

 

it could be that the box information was written prior to them taking it out since if you read the posts about the bet they stated that mulitplayer was painfully boring and so it was likely scraped only later to be reimplemented.

 

also incase you havent updated your games do so, and then stop whining

Reply #25 Top

Quoting StevenAus, reply 18
Yes, please Frogboy, don't try to re-write history.  You promised a number of things with multiplayer and you didn't deliver.  It's one thing to look forward to a much better game in FE.  But don't try to pretend that you didn't drop the ball majorly with WoM's MP.  I can see now why people believe it would be better for FE to go without MP than for it to be stuffed up like it was in WoM.

Best regards,
Steven.

We are referring to what is on the box.

We never "promised" anything. I share with you, in journals, what we have plans to do at the time. Sometimes, things get cut. It's the nature of the beast. This is the case with every game.  But MP in Elemental does work.  It just isn't the same as the SP experience.

Anyway, the whining on this issue gets old. I wish some of you that hang out here just to complain would find some other game to bitch about.