OK and it was only your opinion i would have respected it. and to be honest i can't choose I grew up with Godzilla and have recently watched code geass. such a dilemma

Removed reply #599 due to excessive empty forum space. Please re-post.

Updated the OP. Let me know if you like what you see

Ask Xer07 the same question you asked Whiskey

Code Geass, or Godzilla?

Thats the difference of opinion. When one asks you which song/movie/tv series/etc is better, they want to know your opinion.

Of course someone else will have a different opinion, but so what?

As for me, I havent watched either of the 2

Morph is correct; the question asked concerns opinion.

Now, if we asked "could a Knightmare Frame beat Godzilla", that would be a versus question, and probably quantifiable.

Of course, I think Godzilla would be pretty invulnerable to 99% of the weapons carried by Knightmare Frames in the series, seeing as how he can take multiple tank shells without bleeding.

Analysis: Insufficient emotion utilised by platform designation: Whiskey144.

Recommendation: Initiate action to cease impression of robot.

And the answer is: If the creators of Godzilla wanted it to be able to beat Knightmare Frames, then it would beat them, whether you agree with it or not. That is, if they decided to make an episode that would include said Code Geass stuff.

Now, if Godzilla and Knightmare Frames were real, then the result would be unquestionable. But since they're not real, anybody can pretty much believe whatever they like.

can you tell me how to post pictures i tried copy and paste but it wouldn't work

I think the only things that could beat godzilla would be the fleija bomb and the absolute defense feild

heresy

editted

I think I said ...never mind

Anyway what is a knightmare frame?

limited code geass

The first part of your post makes it sound like I think Knightmare Frames should beat Godzilla (I don't).

Unfortunately, uber-hardcore Trekkies that make Star Trek their religion (they exist, I'm not joking), think that the Federation can beat the Empire.

And not because "quantifiable event x has shown the Federation has significant military advantages over the Empire", but because "the Federation has Quantum Torpedoes, while the Empire has Turbolasers, and lasers won't even penetrate the navigational deflectors of a starship!"

Note that the second statement is actually something that uber-Trekkies have used before. And it also has two logic fallacies in it:

1) "Style over Substance"; that is to say, 'it sounds/looks cooler, so it must be better'. Refer to StarDestroyer.net to see the truth (the site is rather tongue-in-cheek, as it has an Imperial propoganda bent to some pages).

2) "No Limits Fallacy". It is true that in a Star Trek:The Next Generation episode, one of the crewmembers of the 'famous' Enterprise remarks "lasers won't even penetrate our navigational deflectors", when the Enterprise is confronted by some laser-armed spaceships.

The fallacy is in going from "immune to the lasers mounted on x warship" to "immune to all lasers, regardless of laser power". Rather obviously, such a statement is idiocy.

Ironically, a laser capable of unleashing 700 megatons can impart enough momentum to do kinetic damage, so even if a navigational deflector of a Federation starship was immune to lasers irrespective of power, then a 700 megaton laser cannon would still kill a Feddie starship.

The second statement also shows the irrational idea of "turbolaser=laser". In all the Star Wars movies, turbolasers do not behave like laser weapons of any kind. A laser weapon in vacuum would have no visible beam (you'd see a flash at the laser cannon bore/muzzle, and a flash on the target, and even then, the muzzle flash would depend on wavelength; an infrared or ultraviolet laser would have no human-visible muzzle flash), and lasers are lightspeed weapons (which SW turbolasers aren't).

And I only now realize that I've gone completely off-topic/-tangent.

That is MY thing.

The Inquisition is watching you.

Knightmare Frame=robot suit thingy.

Basically, a pilot sits in a cockpit/pod thing that is on the back of a robot. The robot-body itself is probably 4-6 meters tall, and the cockpit-pod thing kinda looks reminiscent of a backpack.

A Knightmare Frame has standard human features, like 2 legs, 2 arms, 2 hands, 8 fingers, 2 thumbs, and a head. Because it has hands it can be equipped with multiple weapon types, ranging from large-caliber machine gun things to bazooka-like launchers and even big-ass spear-things.

just a little bit [quote who="Whiskey144" reply="609" id="2896625"]
Quoting CmdrNilles, reply 606heresy


That is MY thing.

The Inquisition is watching you.


Quoting Altaux, reply 607editted

 

I think I said ...never mind

 



A Knightmare Frame has standard human features, like 2 legs, 2 arms, 2 hands, 8 fingers, 2 thumbs, and a head.

First I said heresy first so I win

and don't thumbs count as fingers too

Nilles, just drag and drop the image you want to post inside the Quick Reply box, where you type your post.

Yes, its THAT simple

@Whiskey: Pretty much what I said about Godzilla and Code Geass, applies to all other other TV series/movies. I dont like repeating myself, but:

"And the answer is: If the creators of Godzilla wanted it to be able to beat Knightmare Frames, then it would beat them, whether you agree with it or not. That is, if they decided to make an episode that would include said Code Geass stuff.

Now, if Godzilla and Knightmare Frames were real, then the result would be unquestionable. But since they're not real, anybody can pretty much believe whatever they like."

LOLZ

Power Rangers meet Transformers!

@Nilles: you can quote a specific part of the reply you want, by clicking "Quote", and then removing uneccessary text. Just dont remove anything inside [ ]. That reduces the amount of forum space your posts take up, plus the other person doesnt have to go through the huge post you quoted, to find out which part you're referring to.

...Subject Morph behaviour: Irrational.

Explain.

with Firefox

With IE

Who can explain it

Who tell me why

Fools give reasons

Wisemen never trrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

ORLY? I do not recall your existence in the The Chatroom thread that Veers made, and I declared someone an actual heretic in there.

Here's mah proof: LINKY

So, I believe that that would make me the official heresy-declarer. Which makes you a heretic for attempting to usurp my position.

The Inquisition is watching you.

Also, your sentence structure is terrible. Please, pay attention in English.

Technically no, as a thumb is in a different articularted position on the hand, and is invariably shorter than 75% of your fingers, and only as long as 25% of said fingers.

Trying to usurp Whiskey as Chatroom Inquisitor. Heavy risk... but the PRIIIZE.

Or rather, "Borderline-suicidal levels of risk.....but the prize".

It's simply not an intelligent decision for Nilles to attempt to usurp my position, and role in this thread.

i'm not afraid of the Inquisition

and i'm in honors english II i'm just not a huge fan of the subject

And tommorow i have CSAP for it

Your probably right but always root for the underdog

My dictionary at my house says that the thumb is a finger

Thanks i fixed the one quote and I just tried the picture thing but it didn't work. 

Is it compatible with google chrome? Thanks

I have never watched Code Geass. So thats how Knightmare Frames seem to me, from Whiskey's description.

Oh God, are there still people that use IE??

LMAO

Eeeeewww Google Chrome? Sigh

Anyway,

1. You messed up your quote there (reply #610), but its ok.

2. I dont know if it works on Google Chrome (apparently not), but if it really doesnt work for you, no matter what browser you're using, then try this:

In the Quick Reply box, you see a tree icon, 2 spots left from the Smiles icon? Click it. A small box will appear. In Image URL, you have to input the URL address of the pic you want to post. That it, it should work now. If not, then set the desired dimensions of the image, and maybe Alignment.

what's wrong with google chrome?

ok i got it i do just have too copy and paste but use the keyboard

@morph- I use IE. Mostly because I don't want to bother learning a new browser and because IE works for me.

Also, IE is less vulnerable to cyberattack than either of Apple's browsers. I believe that's called "irony". TAKE THAT STEVE JOBS!!

@Nilles- The thumb isn't a finger, the same way your big toe isn't a thumb. In a pinch, the thumb can double as finger. Just like you can (not joking here) have your big toe attached where your thumb was if you ever end up with a severed thumb.

Also, it doesn't matter if you do or do not fear the Inquisition. Rather, it only matters that you realize the uselessness of attempting to usurp me, as I can, and will flame/troll you.

I've won flamewars, and I will troll you into the ground if necessary.

ok according to answeres.com-The thumb on the human hand has only two phalanges whereas human fingers each have 3 phalanges. This give the thumb greater movement and enables it to do things the fingers can't do. Collectively the fingers and thumbs are known as digits. The thumb is said to be opposable to the fingers. 

By definition, the thumb is both a finger and not a finger. "Finger" can mean any of the four digits besides the thumb OR any digit including the thumb. It is up to the person to decide whether or not the thumb is considered a finger.

And I apoligize I shall not ursurp you although i may/not put in side comments

LOL, Google Chrome FTW

...... ..... .....

....

IE = By far the worst browser for Windows.

Btw, like I told you in the past, you can use Firefox, but install an IE8 skin, so it would be 90% like IE, not much of a difference in looks, menu bar, navigation bar, etc.

Uhm, who said anything about Apple's browsers? They suck too!

I have to admit though, the only browser that DOESNT suck besides Firefox, is G Chrome.

Ok, I was kinda confused there about the whole thumb thing. Its the big fat finger, yeah you're right. LOL I FAIL

Morph, I only use IE because I'm pretty much too lazy to get anything else, and it works pretty well for me.

Analysis: Lazy.