Paladin77 Paladin77

NYC Bomber is just another attack from AQ.

▼

NYC Bomber is just another attack from AQ.

from JoeUser Forums

We have been attacked by AQ since Mr. Obama took office and no one seems to want to notice. Fort Hood attack, the panty bomber, the oil spill in the Gulf, and the NYC bomber. We have had 125 other attacks inside the USA but we are not paying attention for some reason. Why is it that when Mr. Bush was in office we had 15 thousand attempts to attack us in the USA and after 9/11 they did not have any successes. But now we have made it easier for them to attack us. The sleeper agents are waking up and we are not going after them. DHS has changed policy not because we are more secure but because it is a way to make the last administration look bad. Great Mr. Bush looks bad, and the new administration looks horrible for suppressing news and information we need to know.

 What will happen is that some terrorist is going to get lucky and we are going to find out that it came from a chain of events that we have been kept ignorant of. Every year, at least twice a year we are probed by AQ. When I say probed, I don’t mean one or two guys testing an airport, I mean every air, sea, and bus terminal is probed for a weakness two or three times by different terror cells already in the USA.

 The good news is that we have stopped most of them before they could do serious damage. The bad news is that we are at our limit to deal with the probes and they are exploiting the weaknesses they have found so far.

 We need to wake up before someone parks a nuke on our door.

politics
27,513 views 30 replies
Reply #26 from JoeUser Forums Top

What will happen is that some terrorist is going to get lucky and we are going to find out that it came from a chain of events that we have been kept ignorant of. Every year, at least twice a year we are probed by AQ. When I say probed, I don’t mean one or two guys testing an airport, I mean every air, sea, and bus terminal is probed for a weakness two or three times by different terror cells already in the USA.

One must distinguish Al Qaeda ispired Terrorism and home grown terrorism. The Fort Hood massacrs, horrific as it was, has not been as yet proven to have been linked to the Islamic terrorists operating from the bad lands of Pakistan.

It is unpopular to say so, but the removal of Genaral Musharraf proved to be the factor that has led to this cataclysmic unracellinf of US policy in the region. I had warned against this move.

Reply #27 from Stardock Forums Top

We need to wake up before someone parks a nuke on our door
End of quote

This is being alarmist. It is not easy to acquire the technology to make miniature nuclear devices and hence one may not take such positions even for merwely rhetorical purposes.

TouchTasks - Access tasks with ease on Windows touchscreens.
Reply #28 from JoeUser Forums Top

 

One must distinguish Al Qaeda ispired Terrorism and home grown terrorism.
End of quote

I agree

The Fort Hood massacrs, horrific as it was, has not been as yet proven to have been linked to the Islamic terrorists operating from the bad lands of Pakistan.
End of quote

I agree, it has been proven it was AQ you just choose to ignore it.

It is unpopular to say so, but the removal of Genaral Musharraf proved to be the factor that has led to this cataclysmic unracellinf of US policy in the region. I had warned against this move.
End of quote

It is only unpopular among liberals that demanded he be forced out. He was our only ally in the country and with him gone the place went to crap. THey have nuclear weapons remember, Pakistan is a nuclear nation that is slowly being taking over by AQ not the Taliban. The Taliban is dead, but AQ is still going strong. Liberals want it to be the other way around.

This is being alarmist. It is not easy to acquire the technology to make miniature nuclear devices and hence one may not take such positions even for merwely rhetorical purposes.
End of quote

When the Soviet Union fell they lost a few hundred RA115 man packed Nuclear weapons. North Korea has some, Saddam Hussine was supposed to get some from somewhere which is why we went in there. These weapons take out about a two mile area. When the second scare in Times Square happened they cleared out a three mile area to protect against a nuke not some home made bomb.

When the Oil rig blew up the government sent SWAT teams to every oil rig in the Gulf to check for explosives. That has never been done before. We are under attack, the war is still going on. You and a lot of others are sticking your heads in the sand.

Reply #29 from JoeUser Forums Top

Quoting Cikomyr, reply 23
You know who you remember me of?

Liberals during the Bush year.
End of Cikomyr's quote

That hurt! ;)

Seriously. The people in charge of your Intel are intelligent people. And they will take the intelligent decisions. They've always had, and always will. There is little margin of available decisions anyway.

You don't climb to the top spot as a dummy.
End of quote

No, the people in charge of intelligence Are the idiots I was referring to.  The ones that do the grunt work (meaning actually gather the information that is then spiked or contorted due to political correctness) are as you describe.  And yes, in Politics, you do climb to the top spot by being a dummy.  You have to be a sycophant tot he idiocy of the new messiah, and that does not require brains, just a bleating sheep.

Reply #30 from JoeUser Forums Top

Quoting Nitro, reply 8
Seems there may be a Pakistani Taliban connection here...the story unfolds.
End of Nitro's quote

;)