Hate to burst your bubble gmc2 but President Obama has called himself a 'progressive'.  Does that make him racist against himself?

Race card, gmc2, ya have to be living in a cave.  It seems its being played in reverse.  Not one talk show host has treated Obama like they did Clinton or Bush, Palin plus others.  Now, ya might not like them so you will say they got what they deserved, doesn't matter.  Why isn't Obama being treated like they were.  Race?  Color?  Religion?  Doesn't matter wheather you agree with his politics or not.  Even Biden steps on his wang like there was no tomorrow and doesn't get roasted like the other VP's on both parties did.  Think about it, 

Actually I did not know that sexual avanteurs were racists.  However tea Partiers are not racists since they come in all races and colors.  But if it is the authors false allegation that tea partiers are racists, then it must also be the authors contention that minorities are racists.  Just as he has claimed he is.

And the video proves there is a demonstration, nothing more.  Again, all victimization, and no proof.  But then as the Democrat Speaker said, democrats dont care about proof "only the seriousness of the allegations". So do not worry about facts, just yell louder and that will make it so.

And I would have no problem with you upbraiding Americans for any mis-statements about your health system.  Opinions (for and against) are the mother's milk of forums, but we can at least strive for accuract of the known facts.

I have been reading (I do not watch) the news avidly and have seen nothing of this.  Do you have a link?

ok, i admit i was wrong about cantor. it seems, according to the richmond police, his office was not attacked. the bullet fired thru his office window was one that was shot straight up into that air at 1:00 AM and came straight down. unless that person is a physicist, there's no way it was intended for cantor's office. the police say it was a random errant shot, not an attack on cantor's office.

now, does this mean clyburn was not being honest about being spat upon and called the 'n' word? no, it doesn't. if charlie rangel had said it had happened to him, i wouldn't believe him. clyburn is one of the most respected, by both parties, members of congress.

For those of you sure about the race incident here's your opportunity.....$10,000 reward for proof the Congressman's not a BOLD FACED LIAR

http://reason.com/blog/2010/03/25/andrew-breitbart-offers-10000

Liberals seem to be the ones most concerned about race even when race is not a factor.  Indeed, they are racist.  Which does not mean they hang minorities, only that they cannot see a person, only a race.

Aye cap'n and what do Mrs. Starkers Say?  Me thinks she be going to hog tie ye and prevent ye from sailing anytime in da near future.

Yer still a randy old sea dog.

Ye don't have ta wait for us Colonials fer ye health care.  Ye just want ta ladies to not be spreading crustacians when ye visit us.

Dr, Guy, there are numerous articles on the web about it. the guy's name is Mike Vanderboegh. feel free to google his name. i don't care which side of the argument you're on, this guy is a disgrace to humanity. it doesn't matter if he's republican or democrat, jail his sorry butt.

by the way, i don't see a person's race and never have. i do not care what a person's race, religion, sex, or sexual orientation is. only a person's actions toward others and beliefs matter to me.

Racists means a bigottry or bias because of race.  last I checked there was more than one race.

But to answer your question, he can be.  So I have to ask you, is he?

I did google it and only got blogs.  Hence the request for a link to a news site.  Perhaps you can share one since you have read them all?

But I would also caution you about the colorado syndrome.

But Lincoln freed the slaves you know and since Republicans are the party of Lincoln there's no way any conservative could be racist.

Just like one of the main Republican arguments against the HCR bill was that it would hurt seniors by taking funding from Medicare part D even though the bill actually reduced the "donut hole" in the prescription drug benefit provided by Medicare part D.

But then that's the Republicans for you, such staunch defenders of programs that benefit seniors like Medicare and Social Security. Oh wait ... nevermind.

Party of Lincoln indeed.

dr guy, look under the news results. i told you how to find out more about the guy and you get sarcastic with me? why? i was not being condescending to you.

This from WRSP the Fox affiliate in central Illinois. Links are provided to newpaper articles for those that have to see it in "print".

Mike Vanderboegh Urges Protesters to Throw Bricks

Updated: Thursday, 25 Mar 2010, 11:15 AM EDT
Published : Thursday, 25 Mar 2010, 11:15 AM EDT

You are grasping for straws here about a guy with a Blogspot blog that NOBODY has heard of.  If we want to get picky we can start listing the progressive blogs that incite violence.

Anyways, lets see how that big government is working out so far.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/mar/26/cbos-2020-vision-debt-will-rise-to-90-of-gdp/

President Obama's fiscal 2011 budget will generate nearly $10 trillion in cumulative budget deficits over the next 10 years, $1.2 trillion more than the administration projected, and raise the federal debt to 90 percent of the nation's economic output by 2020, the Congressional Budget Office reported Thursday.

In its 2011 budget, which the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) released Feb. 1, the administration projected a 10-year deficit total of $8.53 trillion. After looking it over, CBO said in its final analysis, released Thursday, that the president's budget would generate a combined $9.75 trillion in deficits over the next decade.

So no I don't expect to personally benefit from this bill and if anything I expect to pay more in taxes because of my "cadillac plan" that requires $20 office vists, $30 specialist vists, $100 ER visits, $1,000 per person per year deductible, $2,000 per family per year deductible, $100 prescription per person per year deducitble and $10/$20/$30 prescription costs.

If anything I am far more likely to be subsidizing *your* health insruance than you'll be subsidizing *mine*.

BTW the term is bald faced liar.

Wasn't so long ago that throwing bricks (and worse) was cheered, even encouraged, by leftists and enshrined by the media.  We tried to tell them it wasn't a good idea.  It was the left which legitimized it, now their feelings are hurt when their tactics are employed against them.

'Scuse me while I go wipe these crocodile tears out of my eyes.

to hell with it. there's far too many idiots and fools in this thread trying to justify the incitement of violence. it doesn't matter which side of the debate you're on, if you try to justify violence, you're just as guilty as the person committing the violence. progressive or conservative, if you committ an act of violence, you're wrong.

Racism.  The universal all-purpose retort.  Available now for the amazing low price of just $19.95!  And if you call now, we'll double your order!  That's two full boxes of racist retorts for the price of one.  Just pay shipping & handling.

Call Now!  Operators are standing by!  No need to hurry, though, this offer will be available forever.

Secondly on a percentage basis that would be somewhat less than the doubling of national debt that Bush Jr presided over and a bit more than 50% of the nearly quadrupling of the national debt that Reagan presided over.

But that's how conservatives work. They don't care about deficits and debt as long as the money goes to corporations or to pay for wars (even though they do tend to keep the wars "off the books" for accounting purposes).

However if the deficits and debts are incurred to help "people" *then* there's all hell to pay. Even though it was the Republicans that got us into this mess in the first place.

You Ayn Rand sycophants are such hypocrites.

Because they have been caught doing it before.  The only lie being perpetrated here is your claims that cannot be backed up with any evidence.

I knew it would not take long for a rabid progressive to bring up Bush.  Let me make you aware of a fact.  Obama has spent more in 14 or so months, than the entire Bush Presidency including the wars.  Nobody is giving Bush a pass here, but this debt is being made worse by Obama, so please stop the history lesson garbage you are trying.

In regards to the Patriot Act, didn't Obama just sign it again?

As opposed to how progressives work, not caring about debt or deficits as long as the government is in control.  I really can't wait until the money runs out for all your entitlements.

That's a good one.  You Karl Marx fans are so crazy.

Keep the name-calling to yourselves please.

I do not believe anyone is trying to justify violence.  What some are asking for is evidence it is being incited by either republican leadership or the Tea party movement.  So far, none of that has been proven or any evidence given.  For all we know, these blogs may be the work of left wing nut cases trying to taint the rights of individuals with their own actions, not the actions of those SPEAKING up against this travesty.  While that is just a supposition at this point, it has been proven to be true in the recent past.  Where basically liberals try to play the victims by inflicting threats and damages upon themselves so that opponents are then blamed.  And when I say proven, I mean in a court of law, not a blog post or even a media outlet.

Damn!  That sounds so real!  I thought I heard it on MSNBC just this week.

Actually the original post is ignorant.  It was not conservatives, but republicans that did not appear to care about the debt.  Even in the Bush years, they were speaking up about the spending, but of course with the consortium of liberals and republicans, were drowned out.

didn't burst my bubble, I think of myself as a progressive (depending on my interpretation) and I'm not a racist. my dog's name is spot therefore all dogs are named spot, hmm. progress happens and I think there is good and bad about progress, can't take one without the other.

textbook example of a freudian slip,but I think I know what you mean, I disagree. rush, fox and such others did not attack the previous administration as they have obama.

the logic of your statement escapes me. I agree with you in that a racist sees color and not the person but to blame the liberals for racism???

let me ask you this; acknowledging that racism is a two way street, do you believe that racism does or does not exist. If you believe that racism exists, then there has to be some racists to make it real. so, now can you honestly tell me that in the millions of people involved that there are no racists among them.