numerarius5988am numerarius5988am

Last person to post wins, unless they are a moderator or admin.

Last person to post wins, unless they are a moderator or admin.

Basically, this game is played so that the last person who post wins. What do they win? The ThreadKiller's Achievement; The honor of being the last person to post by virtue of the content of their post. However, moderators, admins, and anyone else who has the ability to lock the thread are disqualified from winning the ThreadKiller's Achievement, if they win by locking. If the thread is won by method of locking, the "winner" gains the Achievement Of Reprehensible Epic Lameness.

3,456,033 views 25,734 replies
Reply #951 Top

I am

muhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha *ack*.......*cough* *cough*

excuse me

*drinks some water, garggles some of it*

ah! thats better, now where was I

oh yes!

muhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha:rofl:

Reply #952 Top

you are beyond all hope, so much evil must be put down

 

 

Reply #953 Top

is this still going on

Reply #954 Top

depends on how you define evil

yes

now, just sit back and watch the fun

and no posting!

you will disrupt the players

Reply #955 Top
e·vil [ v'l ]


adjective 
 
Definition:
 
1. morally bad: profoundly immoral or wrong

2. harmful: deliberately causing great harm, pain, or upset
    This evil act is clearly the work of terrorists.

3. causing misfortune: characterized by, bringing, or signifying bad luck
   an evil omen

4. malicious: characterized by a desire to cause hurt or harm
   an evil mood

5. devilish: connected with the devil or other powerful destructive forces
   evil spirits

6. disagreeable: very unpleasant
   What an evil smell!



noun  (plural e·vils)
 
Definition:
 
1. wickedness: the quality of being profoundly immoral or wrong

2. force causing harmful effects: the force believed to bring about harmful, painful, or unpleasant events
   a struggle between good and evil

3. something evil: a situation or thing that is very unpleasant, harmful, or morally wrong
    the social evil of alcoholism

4. ryat: violater of all things good

 

[ Old English yfel< Indo-European, "exceeding due limits"]

 
Reply #956 Top

Quoting tesb, reply 955


4. ryat: violater of all things good


 
End of tesb's quote

well now you need to define good

lol

Reply #958 Top

put me the torch?

well as long as its not lit, I dont mind too much

Reply #959 Top

why would i care if you mind? ..that is right because i have no compassion for evil

 

it is too bad that the culling of the ryat population by cyats is not enough to stop you from your heinus deeds.

Reply #960 Top

lol

you still fail to define good or evil

what is bad and what is good

and upon what bases do you define such things

example
             Carnivores- Have no problems killing an animal for the sake of food, though may respect life
             Vegans- Have problems killing an animal for the sake of food, thinks that is not respecting life

therefore which one is evil, the Carnivores for killing an animal or the Vegans for denying food for the Carnivores

Reply #961 Top

If you've ever seen a vegan try to raise a lion on tofu, you know it's evil.

Can the vegan be evil for killing innocent vegetables? They couldn't even attempt to run!

Reply #962 Top

ryat i already defined what is evil (= you) and what is good (=not you). If you have problems with those definitions fine the fire will be still as hot.

 

also you should finally see the point of my definitions. they are not philosophical, they are justifications for getting away with murder while being a self-righteous pseudo inquisitor }:)   ..... no i meant i need to protect others from your crimes (qick i need to sidetrack you) O:)

 

This should also answer you question Draakjacht: the vegan is evil if he is a ryat. he is a saint if the vegetable is a ryat.

Now with this black and white doctrine all questions regarding morality should come clear.

Reply #963 Top

So the vegan is good, not being a ryat. But the vegetable is not a ryat either, so he is not a saint. So he's just okay? But then a saint, by definition, doesn't have to be good, persay. So he can be bad, having killed the veggie, but not evil, not being a ryat, but fail to acheive sainthood, the veggie not being a ryat. So vegans are average people? I fail to believe that.

Reply #964 Top

if you end up with:

So vegans are average people
End of quote

while using a black and white "morality" you are doing it wrong.

if there is not a single ryat involved in your problem then there is no concern raised about good or evil it as easy as that. after all it was he that defiled this new page (and many before).

 

Reply #965 Top

the cyat's answer is simple. if it tastes good eat it. and for cyats the best tasteing food IS ryats.

harpo

 

Reply #966 Top

we ryats taste good because we bath in butter while eating lobster

Reply #967 Top

But black and white morality can't result in no concern either. Then that means there must be an ethical purgatory, a place where events pass back and forth without meaning or judgement.

Now excuse me while I look down upon you all.

Reply #968 Top

pfffft

look down on us

whatever

*jumps into a vat of garlic buttersauce with an armload of crabmeat*

Reply #969 Top

I think you just described a dream I had.

Reply #970 Top

well great minds think a like

and then there is ours

Reply #971 Top

do you dreamed about ryat bathing in food or do you bathed in food in your dream?

Reply #972 Top

obviously they want to make themselves the tastiest food around, so that they will be eaten into extinction.

harpo

 

Reply #973 Top

we can only hope so

Reply #974 Top

nay, we like to tease others and get lots of attention

look at me!

look at me!

look at me!

look at me!

look at me!

look at me!

look at me!

look at me!

look at me!

look at me!

look at me!

look at me!

look at me!

look at me!

look at me!

look at me!

look at me!

look at me!

look at me!

Reply #975 Top

I'm a winner

(You're a winner)
It's just as simple as that
Don't you agree don't you agree don't you agree that I'm a winner?
(You're a winner!)
You just can't argue with that