GeneralEtrius GeneralEtrius

You're Banned!: The Forum Game

You're Banned!: The Forum Game

Okay, here's what you do for this game: You have to "ban" the person who posted above you for an outrageous, silly, or funny reason. Got it?

6,338,228 views 41,551 replies
Reply #28126 Top

banned for playing cat and mouse.

And hot girls can be found anywhere if you look hard enough. And physical gratification, although not everything, is just so much damn fun.

Reply #28127 Top

And hot girls can be found anywhere if you look hard enough. And physical gratification, although not everything, is just so much damn fun.

Banned for thats a lie. I dare you to find a hot girl in a garbage dump on Boxing day between the hours of 6:00 and 9:45

Reply #28128 Top

Banned for taking the word "everywhere" literally.

Quoting Ryat, reply 28127
banned for starting another page

banned for if it is posted it is counted

Nope, it doesnt count :P

Quoting Draakjacht, reply 28128
And hot girls can be found anywhere if you look hard enough. And physical gratification, although not everything, is just so much damn fun.

Thank you Draak :)

"We were inhuman beings....butchers on a field of corpses....corrupt and depraved....only a sum of viscera, blood, and bone - Creatures without soul."

Reply #28129 Top

Banned for being uncivilized.

Reply #28130 Top

Banned for thinking that is uncivilized. You havent seen me get mad, have you? ;)

 

 

"We were inhuman beings....butchers on a field of corpses....corrupt and depraved....only a sum of viscera, blood, and bone - Creatures without soul."

Reply #28131 Top

banned for not mentioning that civilizations have engaged in genocide. I think getting laid once in a while is the least of your worries.

Reply #28132 Top

Banned for mentioning that civilisations have engaged in genocide.

Just wondering, why have people throughout history always felt the urge to kill an entire people because they look or act different? I mean, you get it today as well... There are plenty of people who think that a group of people shouldn't share the earth with them. I don't understand it...

Reply #28133 Top

banned for political discussions

variety of excuses have been used but enough study shows that the ones that have genocide brought upon them always have something that the other side wanted

Reply #28134 Top

Banned because it sounds plausible.

Suppose people fought the native americans not just because they were different, but for resources which were under their homes, and under the places that they were relocated too, and so on. Same with the Aboriginese (I think that's how it's spelt).

Reply #28135 Top

Quoting Oatesy03, reply 28134
Banned for mentioning that civilisations have engaged in genocide.

Just wondering, why have people throughout history always felt the urge to kill an entire people because they look or act different? I mean, you get it today as well... There are plenty of people who think that a group of people shouldn't share the earth with them. I don't understand it...

Banned because it's quite obvious. The genocidal group felt that the group they decided to genocide was a threat to themselves, in some way shape or form.

Much like my belief that homosexuality is a credible threat to civilization. Not joking.

Reply #28136 Top

Banned for thinking its obvious. There's a lot more to it than you may think.

Quoting Oatesy03, reply 28134
Just wondering, why have people throughout history always felt the urge to kill an entire people because they look or act different? I mean, you get it today as well... There are plenty of people who think that a group of people shouldn't share the earth with them. I don't understand it...

Its called Racism. And many people are racists.

Some of the notions of our society have existed for a very long time, and are still present. The hostility and and dislike towards people that are different is one of them.

As long as there people who enforce this way of thinking, there will always be racism in our planet.

This could start a very big discussion, and this is the Ban game, so I am gonna leave it at that.

Quoting Whiskey144, reply 28137
Much like my belief that homosexuality is a credible threat to civilization. Not joking.

Now thats just stupid.

"We were inhuman beings....butchers on a field of corpses....corrupt and depraved....only a sum of viscera, blood, and bone - Creatures without soul."

Reply #28137 Top

Banned because if we were all homosexual the human species would die out.

But that's never going to happen, so...

Reply #28138 Top

@morph- Banned because that's your opinion.

@oatsey- Banned because that's true.

Also, heterosexuality=WIN.

Reply #28139 Top

Banned for, I think both of you would agree to this:

As long as homosexuals are a small percentage of the human population, then we're fine. Its not like we need to breed more or anything.

Quoting Oatesy03, reply 28139
Banned because if we were all homosexual the human species would die out.

But that's never going to happen, so...

Yep, thats never going to happen. Thats why I'm saying its not a problem ;)

Quoting Whiskey144, reply 28140
@morph- Banned because that's your opinion.

Ok, its my opinion.

Quoting Whiskey144, reply 28140
Also, heterosexuality=WIN.

Hey, I didnt say that we NEED homosexuals, I just said that they arent affecting our population a lot.

Overall, they dont do anything really wrong.

"We were inhuman beings....butchers on a field of corpses....corrupt and depraved....only a sum of viscera, blood, and bone - Creatures without soul."

Reply #28140 Top

Also, heterosexuality=WIN.

You Fascist Right-Wing Nazi Treacherous Murderous Dictator! How dare you have opinions in a liberal country! Banned for blatant defiance of all that the Western World stands for!

 

Sorry, just thought I'd introduce the topic of how so much is taboo in our "liberal" countries.

Reply #28141 Top

@morph- Banned because I don't agree with that.

@Oat- Nazi, no. Fascist, no.

Right-wing, maybe, maybe not.

Dictator, probably.

Murderous, certainly.

After all, when I finally found my own country, homosexuality will be illegal and will result in immediate deportation. If resistance (or political agitation) is encountered, then it may well result in a summary execution by specially-appointed Commissariat officials.

Also banned because liberalism is a ridiculous idea, and in the US, a dangerous policy, IMO.

Reply #28142 Top

Banned for failing to understand my point. I was criticising the fact that so-called Liberals criticise others for their views constantly.

Good luck with your country. While I would support a slightly more nationalistic government than my current one, I wouldn't go so far as to deport people for their sexuality. I look forward to being the first British soldier on your country's soil when you inevitably declare war on the world. :P

Reply #28143 Top

Quoting Oatesy03, reply 28144
Banned for failing to understand my point. I was criticising the fact that so-called Liberals criticise others for their views constantly.

Good luck with your country. While I would support a slightly more nationalistic government than my current one, I wouldn't go so far as to deport people for their sexuality. I look forward to being the first British soldier on your country's soil when you inevitably declare war on the world.

Banned because you really won't look forward too it. The Antaran State's standards will be too high, and the God Machines will stride forward for the State.

As for nationalism, well, you always get crappy results with democracy. Which is why it's the 1st thing out the window.

Reply #28144 Top

Banned for self-replication.

And homosexuality is no more disgusting and stupid than heterosexuality.

 

Why did I type "Less"?

Reply #28145 Top

Quoting Scoutdog, reply 28146
Banned for self-replication.

And homosexuality is no more disgusting and stupid than heterosexuality.

 

Why did I type "Less"?

Banned because no one mentioned anything else about self-replication.

Also banned because man+woman is way less disgusting than man+man or woman+woman.

Reply #28146 Top

As for nationalism, well, you always get crappy results with democracy.

Banned because nationalism isn't necessarily non-democratic. I mean looking out for your own country more than others. No more EU, no more lack of immigration regulations. I'm not a racist, I just don't think we should give non-British citizens the same treatment as British citizens in our country simply because they're from an EU country. I'm not saying beat them up or stuff like that, but small things, like choose an unemployed British guy over the dude from another country who'll send all his pay out of our economy and back home, and don't make British citizens stand in long queues at airport terminals coming into the country because there isn't a "British Citizen" queue and an "EU" queue, but only an "EU" queue. Oh, and make it a little harder to acquire British citizenship. Thanks.

 

And if you think I'm a fascist, then screw you Mr Liberal.

Reply #28147 Top

Quoting Oatesy03, reply 28148

As for nationalism, well, you always get crappy results with democracy.

Banned because nationalism isn't necessarily non-democratic. I mean looking out for your own country more than others. No more EU, no more lack of immigration regulations. I'm not a racist, I just don't think we should give non-British citizens the same treatment as British citizens in our country simply because they're from an EU country. I'm not saying beat them up or stuff like that, but small things, like choose an unemployed British guy over the dude from another country who'll send all his pay out of our economy and back home, and don't make British citizens stand in long queues at airport terminals coming into the country because there isn't a "British Citizen" queue and an "EU" queue, but only an "EU" queue. Oh, and make it a little harder to acquire British citizenship. Thanks.

 

And if you think I'm a fascist, then screw you Mr Liberal.

Banned because I never said I thought you were a fascist, which I don't. BTW, I fully agree with your stated opinion. The US is having a similar problem, only substitute "EU resident" with "Illegal Mexican immigrant".

Though I think the EU is a useful institution, primarily as pertains to military and economic matters. But certainly not all that BS about "EU=whatever European country you happen to be in"

Reply #28148 Top

Banned because I wasn't saying you would call me a fascist.

The EU would've been a useful organisation if it had stayed as how it began. It was originally to allow trade between its members to function better.

When it started becoming a political machine for whatever country was the richest at the point in time was when things went downhill...

Just to point out, it has nothing to do with the militaries of its member countries.

You know what really sucks though? Countries like Switzerland are in the "European Economic Zone." You know what that means? They get all the benefits of the EU without having any of the downsides. Basically they get what the EU was originally.

Reply #28149 Top

Banned because the Switzerland thing is stupid. Why did they ever make a system that could be exploited like that?

Oh yeah, that's right, because people are stupid.

 

As for the nationalism thing.... sure in small doses it's a good way to conserve resources and optimize your tax/service exchange, but remember, that way lies America.

Reply #28150 Top

banned switzrland made good knive leave them alone