I have to take some insult in that comment quoted. You seem to be implying that we have never been on the path to improve humanity as a whole when the reality is that the US is considered the beacon of human freedom. I think you and everyone else is giving Obama too much credit for something that has been going on for decades in this country. Every penny with give to countries in need, every soldier that dies fighting for the freedom and lives of people from other countries, every technology that we create and share with the rest of the world, every law that protects peoples rights to their religion and beliefs in this country, it all represents a society who's goal is a world where we can all get along. We may not be perfect, but we dam sure have what could be considered the best concept of "the road to improving humanity".
I’m sorry if you regard that as an insult, but I am unable to bring myself to believe that the reason we have entered into wars and struggles is solely for the purpose of brining freedom to those countries we attack (free market’s perhaps, but that isn’t necessarily freedom).
How many times has the word freedom be used as an excuse? Hitler and Stalin themselves would use words such as freedom and liberation. I’m not saying for a minute that we are perpetrating anything along the lines of those animals, but I’d just like to point out that there are reasons, beyond giving people living in foreign lands more freedom and us all getting along, that our troops are dieing out there, money being spent and torture used.
It’s easy to believe we are on the moral high ground, because we are told daily that we are. Maybe if you were a Russian citizen you wouldn’t be of the same opinion with regards to the United States and you certainly look at Russia in a different light.
Ask Palatines why they won’t embrace democracy and they’ll tell you they did and that they chose Hamas and then ask an Israeli what they think of that political party heh.
Who else here believes that once Guantanamo is closed all the anti-torture protesters will be satisfied and nobody will think twice about the fact that Jews captured by the terrorists and their sympathizers, in Israel, India, Europe, and elsewhere are regularly tortured and killed?
I’m not going to be naive enough to assume that once Gauntanamo is closed that the west will all of a sudden free of such practices however as I said previously it would be a step in the right direction. Then when we do come to approach the people who are doing this to the Jews then their first reproach won’t be “Hypocrite, you do the same in Gauntanamo!”.
Who else here remembers that the "anti-war" protesters started demonstrating against the Lebanon war in 2006 once Israel started shooting back but never in the five years before than when had Hizbullah regularly shelled Israel?
While the plight of people in the Middle East is something of great concern to me, I fail to see how this specific incident relates to the topic of torture.
And who else here recalls that the "anti-war" protesters speaking up against either war in Iraq were utterly quiet when Saddam invaded Iran, when Saddam invaded Kuwait, when Saddam gased Kurds, and when Saddam slaughtered Shiites?
Well firstly I was never anti-war (this time around), I believe what he did to his own people meant he had to go, that being said there are plenty other dictators around the world that are just as bad and many of whom we have been more than friendly with. I’m merely disappointed that it probably wasn’t the real reason for going in.
It is exactly that willingness that you mention there of how Saddam was curiously useful at times (invading Iran) and yet demonized later when he wasn’t (attacking Kuwait, because they were selling oil on the cheap). This highlights my previous point to CharlesCS of how we are not doing things for freedom and liberty, but for personal greed.
Considering all the places in the world where people are tortured, both real and imagined and unproven, how did they arrive at the conclusion that Guantanamo must go first?
Well because it’s the most notorious in the west, it has been highlighted. It also belongs to the west, how can we ask others to clean up when we are just as dirty?
I have seen the torture chambers in Iraq. I was there. But I haven't seen anyone in the west demonstrate for an end to torture of Kurds.
Purely politics isn’t it; we want to see Turkey and Iraq on board, so we let them commit atrocities (or more to the point the media isn’t as keen to report their actions to our society), just like we managed to overlook Stalin during word war 2 and Saddam during his invasion of Iran, politics at its worse. It shouldn’t be overlooked and I can only hope it won’t be, but while we have Guantanamo we can’t turn around to either and tell them to stop.
The way I see "we are our own worst enemies" seems to describe the average American quite well. I still find it hard to believe that some people actually believed we would bomb schools and hospitals in Iraq when the war first started with out a car for the injured in the hospitals and the children in the schools. It almost makes me sick to think these are the same people we share social security numbers with.
Well again I don’t see how this has anything to do with torture, but my own government (considered I suspect just a liberal as any) invented “strategic bombing”, the intention to demoralize a country from the air and grinding the country to a halt. Now this obviously wasn’t the case in Iraq, it wasn’t a war of attrition and such actions were not deemed necessary, but I’d just like to provide you with an example of just how low the west has been willing to go (let’s not talk about Vietnam and India). It’s disheartening to believe that we would do such a thing and I don’t believe we have ever done so, but I’d like to provide you with two films to watch. One is called Charlie Wilson’s War and the other is called 9th Company or (9 pota), the first is an American film portraying events in Afganistan during the 1980’s during the Soviet/Afgan war the other is a Russian film portraying events during the same time period.
The American film shows Russian choppers annihilating innocent afgan civilians and towns (no doubt including hospital and schools), the Russian film shows the same thing, but before it happens a Russian squad is in the town and is attacked by children with AK-47’s. Two viewpoints, whose right? What happened?
I don’t think I could bring myself to believe that people who represent us could purposely harm innocents, yet at the same time, I wouldn’t be naive enough to outright dismiss it.
