...

I didn't know the story of the Persian crown, but I am glad that Muhammed's followers recognise the importance the crown has for Jews and Judaism. I wonder what happened to it.

I think any right minded person already knows that what the terrorists practice is NOT ISLAM but some bastardized version of it that preaches hate and death to any and all that are not Islamic.

Yes. But I figured I had to write something about the Mumbay bombings. And then it occured to me that the best way to handle it would be to isolate the terrorists.

Instead of recognising the effort of the terrorists I'll recognise the efforts of those who promote peace.

And I am not talking liberal feel-good idealism here. This is not about compromise and understanding the other side. I don't care what the terrorists want. And I don't promote compromise.

An Israeli embassy in Khartoum and diplomatic relations between Sudan and Israel would be good for Sudan and good for Israel. It's a positive message. And that's important.

I will try to post more examples of positive messages, more examples of what the terrorists do not want people to know about.

Islam is a Religion. As such it is no one's "enemy". Like any Religion, people pick and choose what they feel most comfortable with and also, some use it to gain secular power. People use religion to unite or divide, to include and exclude. That is true for all peoples. Religion is also a uniting force inside a society.

Perhaps, Leauki you might ask ThinkAloud to expound on the concept of 'Oomah'. Why do the Arab states begrudge Israel? A country the size of New Jersey. Why do they make life a hell on Jews living in their countries? Perhaps ask him the meaning of the word 'Farhood', or 'Udroob el-Yahood'.

Since Zionists began emigrating to Israel as a result of Pogroms and close to 1,000 years of anti-Judaism in Russia and Europe at the end of the 19th Century, and buying lands from the Ottomans, the unified Religious-Secular Arab-Muslim states of the Middle East have resisted such settlement. Even the Holocaust didn't soften the Arab stand. In fact, to this day Holocaust denial is a feature of Friday sermons by some Imams (especially those in Arab countries).

Despite coming into existence as a result of WWI and the Sykes-Picot Agreement, these Muslim states have waged endless war against Israel, only Egypt making peace in 1973. Anwar Sadat paid for that with his life.

Let's be honest about it all...if it weren't for oil, would the USA give a tinker's damn about the Middle East? I'd like to think it would, but my gut tells me no.

They profess allegiance to the cause of the indigenous Arab population, yet do not allow them to become citizens in their countries (Muslim countries) to keep the homeless and angry and a potential weapon.

This leads me to the end of my piece: Who is motivated to cause all this? The answer is simple. The Arab leadership. They are the most reactionary regimes on the planet. The only way to preserve their power is to keep their masses ignorant, unhealthy and with an enemy to unite them (Israel and the Jews) and divert them from overthrowing the British appointed "Kings". They use the deeply religious, traditional society structure to maintain male dominance over females as well.

Look, if you don't know this by this point, what can I say?

أيار / مايو للسلام وسلام الله عليكم ، أطفالك وأطفالك الأطفال

that should read "..... dictated by him and written by others"

"Oomah" or "Umah" , means "Nation" in Arabic.

There are two of them. i dont know which one you meant.

The Islamic concept refers to the "Muslim Nation" .. and that is a concept established by God in Qura'an when He says "and your Nation is is One nation ... and I am your Lord ... Worship Me"

with that order All Muslims belong to One Nation regardless of their location, skin color, ethnic origin or previous alliances or religion. That should not be understood as undermining the "national borders" of any country or state ... these are recognized as administrative necessities and existed even during the Pr. life and throughtout Islamic history. But the obligations of muslims toward each other does not stop at those administrative borders ... if some muslims are in trouble ... all muslims are in trouble and they must help those in trouble. 

However, Muslims are required by Islam to follow the rules of international laws in providing the help needed to other Muslims.

The second meaning of the "Nation" concept is referring to the "Arab Nation" sometimes called the "Arab World".

this is a geographical area where all people (muslims, christians or jews) speak Arabic, have the same historical background, have the same culture, suffer the same problems, and they used to be REALLY one "Nation" for almost 1300 yrs now. that area was divided at the end of WWI by the allies and between themselves as occupiers ... the people there (not their occupiers-appointed rulers) never ever acknowledged that division ... the occupiers (mainly Great Britain and france) even created new entities like Kuwait, Jordon, Lebanon, and most of the small Gulf States. (Kuwait was part of Iraq, Lebanon was part of Syria, Jordon was part of Palastine and the Gulf States were part of the "Arab Peninsula") ...

The people of that "Arab Nation" feel and act naturally as One nation regardless of what the world (or their rulers) say. as you can imagine a 100 yrs of forced-division can not erase 1300 yrs of history.

Let me make something very clear here: As far as Muslims or the Arabs are concerned ... the Jews are one thing ... Israel is a totally different matter.

what you see between the arabs and Isreal would have been the same regardless of the religion of the people there. even if they were Muslims, the same conflict would have existed ... (actually you see it now between Lebanon and Syria, and in fact between the Palastinians and Jordon, and of course between Iraq and Kuwait see above for the reason)

Having established that, then i think you yourself can figure out the reason ... considering the concept of the "Arab Nation".

it was not enough that Britain and France divided that Nation, they promised people in europe to create a new country in the middle of that "nation" for them ... to the arabs, it didnt matter what was the religion of those people or the reason for that promise ... the fact remains that an occupier took a part of their land and gave it to other people from another continent ...

these are the facts ... this is the root of the problem ...

solving that problem now is the key to restore relative peace to that region. and I say relative peace because those people will never rest and be at peace with the west (since the west is the one who divided them in the first place) till they have ALL their "Arab Nation" back. we here can laugh at them .... but that is us .... it is not our land and it is not our nation ... but it is their land and their nation.

I am telling you what i know about the vast majority of them ... their rulers are against that, most of the world is against it .... their answer to that ... we will endure as we endured before ...

they jokingly say we will wait the second Saladin (the one who unified them after the Crusades)

how to solve that problem is the issue for the world to figure out.

but as you can see, the two are political problems, it has nothing to do with the three religions. of course it is obvious that some fanatics use religion to attract support from the masses who are desperately looking for anyone to get rid of their rulers as well as their occupiers. that is the button of weakness that the terrorists push and they know they will get some to support their ways. but most of the masses there know that is the wrong way and they dont support it ...

in fact, the first acts of terror (in 1980's and early 1990's) were aginst those masses themselves in Egypt, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Jordon and turkey. then they escaped the heavy-handed rulers there to europ, Afghanistan, pakistan, and some to us here  (Umar AbdelRuhman of 1993 WTC first attack)

hope that gives you an idea about the complexity of these two problems.

And may God's Peace, Mercy and blessings be upon you and your family too.

Middle-eastern Jews are NOT from "another continent". More than half of the population of Israel is from the middle east and fled their home lands.

Israel is NOT an "occupier". Jews and Arabs both live in the land of Israel and if it had been up to the Zionists and Jews, both would have lived in peace with equal rights.

Israel was NOT "given" to the Jews. Israel was always Jewish land. The fact that Arabs/Turks/British invaded it at certain times doesn't mean that Jess gave up their claim. It also doesn't mean that of all the invasions and occupations, including the Jewish one, only the Arab invasion was legal and hence constitutes official ownership. The Zionists have at least as much right to the land as any other group invading and occupying it.

Before the Zionists came Israel had a very small (Jewish and Arab) population. It was nearly empty land with enough room for Jews and Arabs.

But in contrast to the Arabs the Jews had nowhere else to go. European Jews had just been exterminated. Jews in the Arab world were fleeing to France and Israel.

You have this weird idea that Israel is some sort of European or American colony./

To us it is the last place middle-eastern Jews can live in peace. If Israel falls, the middle east will be Jew-free.

And there will be no compromise. The compromise between six million dead and noone dead is three million dead. That's not good enough. We have seen that "death to the Jews" can lead to death to the Jews. Israel does not trust Hitler's allies.

As simple as it sounds, I ask Arabs to simply accept that Israel exists and find ways to work with her toward making the Middle East a better place to live. But, apparently it is not that simple.  Too bad.

All parties need to come to terms with the fact that no party is going to just go away. And clearly interminable warfare is no answer. 

I would like to see a Palistinian State and Israel work with her toward a positive, healthy future.

Be well.

Well said Leauki...all of the posts. I won't rehash minor points.

The major point is this: Israel is a Geo-Political entity and fact. It existed long before the Romans and will exist long after Amadinejad and the current crop of Dictators, Kings, etc.

Judaism will also exist the same way. Despite the hatred and anger on both sides.

When will there be peace? When Arab mothers love their children more than they hate the Jews.

I also don't care about "the crown of Persia" except to note that Esther was his Queen, and that the Festival of Purim  celebrates the rescue of the Jewish people from Haman (who was, in essence an Amelakite). Hitler's first act was to ban the celebration of that holiday (another Amalek).

As Jews we are taught to remember three things: 1) Ma'amad Sinai (Receiving G-d's Law) 2) The Shabat and it's holiness and 3) That which Amalek did to you.

مايو بمباركة من الله والسلام عليكم

Yevarecha hashem v'yair panecha v'yiten lecha shalom

A brave and powerful endeavor, maybe I can help by doing some looking myself, after all we did work together on the "liberal dictionary"

If Cyrus was a benefactor, it was because  Esther  (alayhah hashalom) prevented him from being a butcher.

I believe the greatest benefactor is yet to come (Hamashiach ben David).

When you ask from among those from the past? I'll take the founders of Tzahal, and those who have served, are serving and will serve. They are the sword and shield. They are the main reason we live in relative "peace". I was honored to have served and to have fought for Israel and our people. There is no difference between Israel and the Jewish People. There never has been nor will there ever be.

Yes, she did. So have others. It is repeated endlessly. Just not by the right people.

Thank you.

However, we must not forget ancient allies. Iran might suffer under tyranny now, but the Iranian people will come through. And they deserve Israel's friendship and loyalty.

Killing five million Israelis is the same as killing five million Jews. I never understood how it could be any different, given that most Israelis are Jews and that the Israelis who would die if the PLO had their way would certainly be Israeli Jews. (Not that the Bedouins and Druzim would fare much better...)

I think the most important thing now is for the world to recognise that a "war" starts when someone starts shooting, not when Israel shoots back.

I understand that it is hard, if not impossible, for you to believe that. You believe, as i have noticed from your writings and also from discussing the issue with other Jewish friends, that Israel IS the Jews and vice versa. Muslims believe that is a political view not a religious one. Judaism is a religion and its followers live allover the world just like Islam or Christianity or any other belief system. But not all jews think that way ... many in Israel itself look at the issue as a political one not a religious one.

They certainly are NOT. and the problem was not them. they lived there for over 1300 yrs among Muslims with no major problems ... of course i am not saying there were never ANY religious flares here and there ... but that is normal for any Nation that includes many ethnic groups as the "Arab Nation" is. and it was not confined to Jews only ... it existed even among different Muslim groups themselves ... but there were not anything major that you could call a "conflict"

If you noticed i said the problem started almost 100 yrs ago (in fact about 110 yrs now). specifically after the British promise to establish a Jewish land in Palastine ... that is when the conflict started ... and yes the Arabs became alarmed when that was done and they started their effort to avoid it. what you call "the jews satrted fighting back" the arabs call the climax of the fulfillment of that promise and that is why they considerd it a "war" and that war was not against Isreal only it was against the Occupier , Britain who gave the occupied land to others, as will.

even if you assume that ALL jews there were Arabs, and those who you call middle eastern Jews ARE arabs, the idea to create a "country" for them is considered a further division of the Nation that was already divided .  

That is very true. and it confirms my point that Muslims have no conflict with the Jewish people.... but they have a major one with Israel.

A fundamental point that the Arabs fail to convey to the world, and I noticed that they are never good at that in any conflict, is that when some of them say that they want to "destroy Israel" they are talking about the "Political" entity not the people who live there. That reminds me of our position here in the USA when we always said, and finally did, we will destroy the "USSR" or the "Evil Empire" as Raegan called it... and none of us objected to that or even thought that the intent was to destroy or kill the people there. The Arab's failure in that point is a major part of their general failure to manage the conflict in a way that satisfies both sides.

That is the point that has to be made from both sides ... the Israelis are there whether the Arabs like it or not   and the palastenians are there whether the israelis like it or not. Both claim the same land .... and BOTH are RIGHT. and that is what is amazing aboout this conflict.

my own view is that neither of them will be satisfied with the "Two States" solution ...

I say it is the "One State" solution .. based on the Canadian model. ... both sides, correctly, believ that ALL Palastine is theirs .... that is why the settlements will never stop ... and the Palastenians will never stop thinking that northern israel is as dear to them as Gazza. So, give ALL of it to them both. ....  I think the people themselves will work it all together if the leaders on both sides are sane and supress their own egos.

neither are the Palastenians. and that is exactly my point.