Can Michelle Obama get any more irritating?



Yes she can! :)

Just team her with Evita Kerry and Viola. :CONGRAT:

135,821 views 79 replies
Reply #1 Top
Do we see the second coming of Hillary? Stick her in politics and you would not be able to tell the difference. ;)
Reply #2 Top
Women can always get more annoying.

Reply #3 Top
Yeah god forbid that we have women who actually think for themselves. next thing you know those women will want to own property or actually think they are allowed to vote a way different from their husband.

Reply #4 Top

I read part of an interview with Barak...he said he picked Michelle as a wife partly because of her "roots in Chicago."  Because roots are something he never really experienced as a child and it is appealing to him.

Roots or not, she is friggin annoying.  She is the epitome of everything negative I think about when thinking about Chicago....loud, demanding, thinks she superior.  If Barak is the next president, you can bet a lot of his policy will be based on what his over bearing wife thinks....because I don't imagine she will let him have a moment's respite if he doesn't do things her way.

Gah.  I DO NOT WANT HER FOR A FIRST LADY.

 

Reply #5 Top
Yeah god forbid that we have women who actually think for themselves. next thing you know those women will want to own property or actually think they are allowed to vote a way different from their husband.


I always knew the democrats were still in the plantation mindset. So you want to keep them barefoot and pregnant? :LOL:  :LOL: 
Reply #6 Top
Its the Republicans who felt that the role of government should be deciding the healthcare options of women.
Reply #7 Top
Its the Republicans who felt that the role of government should be deciding the healthcare options of women.


Here you state again that Hillary is a republican. Can you provide evidence to back up your claim?  :LOL: 
Reply #8 Top
Its the Republicans who felt that the role of government should be deciding the healthcare options of women.Here you state again that Hillary is a republican. Can you provide evidence to back up your claim?   


Actually here I am stating you are apparently illiterate.
Reply #9 Top
Actually here I am stating you are apparently illiterate.


RIF Rover, RIF! Those 3 fingers again! Why do you keep contradicting yourself?  :LOL: 
Reply #10 Top
Why do you keep contradicting yourself?


Does your family tree not fork or are you just overloading like a typical republibot faced with reality?
Reply #11 Top
Does your family tree not fork or are you just overloading like a typical republibot faced with reality?


if you are just going to be childish and infantile, I see no further use for you. You cant answer questions. You cant tell the truth. you cant stop being insulting (as in you really are insulting), and you cant read. Do you have any positive qualities? Or you just another one of those dirty tricks the democrats are always pulling? :LOL:
Reply #12 Top
if you are just going to be childish and infantile


Oh please, you sniveling about that is akin to Karl Rove complaining about unethical campaigning.
Reply #14 Top
Yes, she can be more annoying, she could be "First Lady".  :SURPRISED: 
Reply #15 Top
Yes, she can be more annoying, she could be "First Lady".   


I'd rather have her than McSame and his drug addict charity thief ex-mistress.
Reply #16 Top
Brad Wardell for President - because he doesn't have quite enough to do yet.
Reply #17 Top
Brad Wardell for President - because he doesn't have quite enough to do yet.


who?
Reply #18 Top
Brad Wardell for President - because he doesn't have quite enough to do yet.who?


The owner of this site. Better get familiar with the name.  :LOL: 
Reply #19 Top
I'd rather have her than McSame and his drug addict charity thief ex-mistress.


Because you are just as bigoted as she is.
Reply #20 Top
Because you are just as bigoted as she is.


You are complaining that I am biased against drug addicted charity thiefs who have affairs with married men?
Reply #21 Top
hey imagine if Obama does win, the first lady can serve citlins and fried chicken with watermelon for her first state dinner.

How's that for racist?
Reply #22 Top
How's that for racist?


Forgot the ribs.
Reply #23 Top
You are complaining that I am biased against drug addicted charity thiefs who have affairs with married men?


No, I'm calling you a bigot. A mindless fool who hates entire groups of people based on your predetermined notions. Not because of your empty headed parroting of DNC talking points about Prs. Bush, but because of your criminal libel against people in groups you disagree with.
Reply #24 Top
No, I'm calling you a bigot. A mindless fool who hates entire groups of people based on your predetermined notions. Not because of your empty headed parroting of DNC talking points about Prs. Bush, but because of your criminal libel against people in groups you disagree with.


Careful - he will sue you for definition of character - after all, they got all the tort lawyers. ;)
Reply #25 Top
Careful - he will sue you for definition of character - after all, they got all the tort lawyers.


He'd have to have some charachter to defame.