Politico:

Wrong again Bucko! The "Sullivan Decision" from the U.S. Supreme Court. Libel is also illegal in all U.S. states. Even if there were no Supreme Court decision, your libel was committed on the internet. Internet crime is a federal offense.

But all that aside, why do you want to be a scummy liar? You know that voting for a candidate is not treason, so quit insisting it is. That or admit that you just hate anyone who thinks differently than you do, and can't stand the fact that you aren't the only one with rights.

Either way, I don't see much respect for freedom or the U.S. from you.

Precisely...

So you deny that the opinion is my own?



Doesn't make it a federal crime.




My libel wasn't committed at all, you simply argued that it was a federal crime for me to have an opinion you didn't like.



Who said I wanted to be a republican?



Says the person who called me a "scummy liar".



I don't see any sign of independent thought from you. But we both have our opinions now, don't we. The only difference is I can debate the issues without threatening lawsuits. You apparently lack that ability.

Idiot, yes it does.



No, there you go, lying again. I never said your opinion is a federal crime. I said your libel against me and other Republicans is a federal crime. You accuse me and other Repubicans of treason, that is a capital crime. If you can't back up your accusations, that is called Libel.

You then proved your worthlessness by saying that voting for a presidential candidate is treason.



Right, I didn't call everyone I disagree with a "scummy liar", in fact, the only person I was refering to in that statement is YOU. Now, you might not be "scummy", that is simply my opinion of you. But you lied, so you are a liar.



I never once threatened a lawsuit. Show me where I threatened to sue you.

What I did was tell you that if you libelled me again, I would report it to FBI internet crimes.

Get your facts straight!

Yes, we both have different opinions, and that's a good thing.

I thought Libel was a tort... it's a crime too?

Yes. Unfortunately stupidity is not.

So thats why you aren't in prison.

The_Politico

I specifically requested that you present facts to back up your absurd statements and you failed, even avoided, doing doing so. Based upon this I must conclude that your statement is nothing more than hyperbole and rhetoric which of course means that you have no basis at all upon which to make any sort of reasonable and intelligent argument. I can only conclude that you lack anything even remotely resembling intellectual honesty therefore you aren't worthy of any sort of intelligent attention at all.

Good lord you truly are as stupid as you look. I have made no "absurd" statements. At least not "absurd" as in untrue, perhaps "absurd" as in "George Bush finds the concept of having morals 'absurd'".

Liar

So you don't think he is as stupid as he looks?

Liar

Ok I know this is a serious discussion...but as an observer at this point I have to say....Politico makes me laugh out loud with some of the snappy comebacks.....hilarious.

Being a snappy comebacker is an art imo, and should be appreciated even when directed toward me.  

Yup, and I've already awarded her a "way to get one" for one of them. ;~D

It's too bad her points points aren't given as much thought. Voting is treason? ROFL

Let's give him/her some time...we need some Democrats, some MORE Democrats on the site...spices things up.

And being a snappy comebacker only adds to the mix.

Maybe we need loons like this, but I dont think the other democrats really want to be associated with someone who only knows insults, not facts.

They are fun, but after the 5th "and sos your mama" comeback, it gets tired.

What, you mean your momma isn't? *snaps fingers* Dang it.

Seriously though, yes indeed, they don't help. Feels like it brings up the association fallacy. *sighs*

Yeah, I assumed that would be about all you could muster being as childish insults are far easier than intellectually defending your statements. Or perhaps you simply know that you can't possibly back them up with anything even remotely resembling facts?

Or perhaps your idiotic yammerings have proven that you are incapable of being able to or wiling to comprehend anything inconvenient to your preconceived delusions so I would be wasting my time.

Put up or shut up name one person who has ever been imprisoned for libel.

Historically I can remember of at least one person right off the back, that would be Thomas Cooper.

Recently, as in the past decade or two, I think (emphasis on think) there was a person, but I'll have to look for it more.

William Evans

Right off the bat, his comments are blown away. I can't help but laugh about it. Oh, and just in case he denies it because of so called no evidence, he can take a peak right here, or just google Willie or William Evans and libel (putting the latter in quotes).

Official Troll Declaration: The_Politico. His presence is completely pointless.

Ooh, official, does that mean it comes rubber stamped, sent in, verified, sent back, lost, found and signed in triplicate?

(I hope someone gets the movie/book reference.)