terpfan1980 terpfan1980

Explain again, just what is Hillary Clinton's experience?

▼

Explain again, just what is Hillary Clinton's experience?

from JoeUser Forums

Someone please, just about anyone, though I'm looking sort of at one particular Hillary Clinton lover to really come on over and defend the bit..., uh, woman (and I use that term very loosely and feel bad about the disrespect it shows to all other women out there) and really explain just what is Hillary Clinton's experience?

What makes her more qualified for the office of President of the United States than anyone else, like say my birds, or the neighbors cats, or especially other legitimate candidates like her current opponent Senator Barack Obama.[more]

Seriously, where does anyone, and I mean anyone, in their right mind come off saying that Hillary Clinton is the more experienced candidate.  What experience are you counting?  What measuring system are you using?

Hillary ducking from Sniper FireShe was first lady.  That got her a ton of experience didn't it?! (NOT!)  Experience in attending funerals, state dinners, meeting and greeting (even if she didn't have to duck snipers) and things like that maybe, but when she was at these events it was as first lady.  She was meeting other first ladies, other spouses of other dignataries and officials and the like, and never once really to have input into any matters of state.  Do you really believe that is experience that qualifies someone to be President of the United States?

She is still the Junior Senator from New York, that the experience you want to count?  A whopping 4 years of additional experience over the person that is ahead of her in the polls, ahead in delegate count, would be miles ahead of her if it was winner take all and not the screwed up proporational system that is keeping her in the running.  And wow, she has helped passed a ton of bills, co-authored a ton of bills, sponsored a ton of legislation, oooops, not.

So what makes Hillary Clinton qualified or more qualified than the next person.

I'll re-use the question that Geraldine Ferraro raised -- if Hillary Clinton wasn't a woman would she be where she was?  Answer: Hell No.

If she wasn't a former first lady, she wouldn't even have been elected as a carpet bagging Senator from New York.  She'd have disappeared off into the sunset, or, you know what -- she'd have left her scumbag husband for his habitual cheating, rather than sticking around with him because her own addictive personality won't let her slink away from power.

Hillary Clinton respresents the worst in U.S. politics in far too many ways.  That she gathers any support shows the desperation of some.  Some that believe that times were oh so much better with a Clinton in the White House.  Enough already of the Bush / Clinton then Bush ride.  We don't need to repeat it.  The Clintons had their chance to get things done for this country.  If she really was a co-President as she tries to claim, then technicly she should be excluded from being a candidate for the same reason her husband can't run.  She had her 8 years, that's the constitutional limit, time for someone else to take the job.

But, I'll certainly entertain defense of the woman even as I sneer at such defenses as pathetic justification for wanting to waste a vote on someone that will clearly lose in the general election.

politics
26,691 views 69 replies
Reply #26 from JoeUser Forums Top
When the government adds extra rules than the countries we're competing with, it's not really a fair competition.
End of quote


It helps a few workers by not making them look for other jobs. It helps some lazy entrepreneurs by not making them keep up with the changing times.

It hurts everyone else. Workers and Employers.
Reply #27 from PolMach Forums Top
how about almost 30 years in congress?
End of quote


You mean as opposed to someone who actually had to work for a living?

Siege of Centauri
Reply #28 from JoeUser Forums Top
how about almost 30 years in congress?You mean as opposed to someone who actually had to work for a living?
End of quote


Sorry, none of them are running. Just a gimp, a wimp, and a bimbo.  :LOL: 
Reply #29 from PolMach Forums Top
Obama worked for a living, thats why he and his wife were still paying off student loans until 18 months ago. No wonder McSame sees nothing wrong with continuing the economically disastrous policies of the Bush junta.
Reply #30 from JoeUser Forums Top
he and his wife were still paying off student loans until 18 months ago
End of quote


Guess that's why they're so bitter. ;)
Reply #31 from JoeUser Forums Top
thats why he and his wife were still paying off student loans until 18 months ago
End of quote


AH! I see, being a student is working! Love the newspeak from the left!  :LOL: 
Reply #32 from PolMach Forums Top
thats why he and his wife were still paying off student loans until 18 months agoAH! I see, being a student is working! Love the newspeak from the left!   
End of quote


Are you illiterate or simply retarded? I never said they were a student eighteen months ago, I said they were actually paying student loans till that period.

How do you think they were paying off their student loans. WORKING. Perhaps you have heard of it, its what your mother does while you sit in her basement all day.

Reply #33 from JoeUser Forums Top
Obama worked for a living, thats why he and his wife were still paying off student loans until 18 months ago. No wonder McSame sees nothing wrong with continuing the economically disastrous policies of the Bush junta.
End of quote


I guess "working" means dealing with people like Resko. 


Reply #34 from JoeUser Forums Top
Are you illiterate or simply retarded? I never said they were a student eighteen months ago, I said they were actually paying student loans till that period.

How do you think they were paying off their student loans. WORKING. Perhaps you have heard of it, its what your mother does while you sit in her basement all day.
End of quote


You have said nothing but call names - the resort of the clueless and one who has no facts. People in politics get paid. Shock I know! Obama was in the senate 18 months ago. You are the confused one. Either he was working or in government (according to you). Before he was in the senate, guess what? he was in state government! {Shock} :LOL:

You dont even know what you are talking about or the point you are trying to make. Why would I even try to debate you when you have YET to make a coherant statement to debate? I am just laughing at your name calling and purple faced rantings.

Keep it up! You are great enjoyment, and unfortunately a typical example of what passes for logic from liberals. :LOL: 
Reply #35 from PolMach Forums Top
you have YET to make a coherant statement to debate?
End of quote


Don't mistake your low intelligence preventing you from comprehending a COHERENT (note the ACTUAL spelling) statement with there being no coherent statement.

Reply #36 from JoeUser Forums Top
Don't mistake your low intelligence preventing you from comprehending a COHERENT (note the ACTUAL spelling) statement with there being no coherent statement.
End of quote


There go those 3 fingers again! :LOL:

Always with the negative waves, Moriarity, always with the negative waves! :LOL:
Reply #37 from PolMach Forums Top
Don't mistake your low intelligence preventing you from comprehending a COHERENT (note the ACTUAL spelling) statement with there being no coherent statement. There go those 3 fingers again! Always with the negative waves, Moriarity, always with the negative waves!
End of quote


Isn't it time for your charge nurse to lead you away from the rec room and back to your cell for your meds?
Reply #38 from JoeUser Forums Top
Isn't it time for your charge nurse to lead you away from the rec room and back to your cell for your meds?
End of quote


hahaha! At least your insults are not stale and tired like your lies that you try to browbeat people into believing are facts! But of course that is all you have, insults. No facts, no debating, no arguments, just insults.

You are a good little liberal! Keep insulting and hope they will tire of it.

Here's a hint: This is not retarded chimp.com. YOu have to go to no brain land to win points with stupid insults.  :LOL: 
Reply #39 from PolMach Forums Top
YOu have to go to no brain land
End of quote


What does your hometown have to do with anything?

Its amazing you are too stupid and/or sociopathic to realize you are insulting people while simultaneously sniveling about being insulted.

Let me guess you would ask OJ for advice on how to get along with your ex-wife.
Reply #40 from JoeUser Forums Top
What does your hometown have to do with anything?
End of quote


point proven. You just cant read. SOrry, no points for you. Insulting yourself does not win points either. 3 finger sam. :LOL:
Reply #41 from PolMach Forums Top
3 finger sam
End of quote


I don't have time to get a lobotomy for your idiocy to make sense, WTF are you talking about?
Reply #42 from JoeUser Forums Top
Clearly The_Politico is full of himself and thinks insulting wisecracks somehow prove something. Well, they do... just not what The_Politico thinks they prove. ;)
Reply #43 from PolMach Forums Top
Clearly The_Politico is full of himself and thinks insulting wisecracks somehow prove something. Well, they do... just not what The_Politico thinks they prove.
End of quote


Clearly Daiwa is as illiterate as Dr. Iwishiwasaguy and is dumb enough to think that ignoring half the posts means the other posts don't count. funny how you only noticed insults by me and just "forgot" the ones directed at me.

Not that it shocks me, all rightwingers lack the morals to practice what they preach.
Reply #44 from JoeUser Forums Top
Dang, fishing's easy here. :LOL:
Reply #45 from PolMach Forums Top
Dang, fishing's easy here.
End of quote


Dang your lying is getting abundant in here. Clearly Daiwa thinks its brainless sycophantism to the fascist ruling state make it something special to the 25% of Americans who think Bush deserves something other than a treason conviction.
Reply #46 from JoeUser Forums Top
Obama worked for a living, thats why he and his wife were still paying
off student loans until 18 months ago. No wonder McSame sees nothing
wrong with continuing the economically disastrous policies of the Bush
junta.I guess "working" means dealing with people like Resko. 
End of quote


Actually, he really worked for a living. Shocking, eh? :p In fact, Mrs Obama lived in South Chicago, a region not exactly known for it's wealthy individuals, and worked her but to get to where she is. That sounds like working, hard work no doubt.

Dang your lying is getting abundant in here. Clearly Daiwa thinks its brainless sycophantism to the fascist ruling state make it something special to the 25% of Americans who think Bush deserves something other than a treason conviction.
End of quote


Wow, talk about saying nothing in so many words.

And, some advice from someone that is widely disliked her, due to his ramblings and other stuff:

1) Be nice. 2) Quit being retarded. 3)See one and two. 4) Watch your coherency.

'Night
Reply #47 from JoeUser Forums Top
Actually, he really worked for a living. Shocking, eh?
End of quote


The false implication was two-fold. One, that politics was not a job (in which case she lied, since her definition of a job seemed to entail getting paid), and 2 that only Obama had done it - another lie, since by no stretch of the imagination could one think that flying combat missions was not a job.

And of course the related item to number 1, was that Obama had been working all his life until he magically (Lucky Charms!) appeared to run for president.

And if we are going to get to the "casting aspersions" stage, then it is not McCain that is being slammed here, but Hillary and Kerry (he never did anything but shoot up 44 gallon drums).

That is what she was being called out on, and when done so, you can see she basically resorted to name calling to justify her lies.
Reply #48 from JoeUser Forums Top
To the politico;

Isn't it time for your charge nurse to lead you away from the rec room and back to your cell for your meds?
End of quote


Its amazing you are too stupid and/or sociopathic to realize you are insulting people while simultaneously sniveling about being insulted.

Let me guess you would ask OJ for advice on how to get along with your ex-wife.
End of quote


Clearly Daiwa is as illiterate as Dr. Iwishiwasaguy and is dumb enough to think that ignoring half the posts means the other posts don't count. funny how you only noticed insults by me and just "forgot" the ones directed at me.

Not that it shocks me, all rightwingers lack the morals to practice what they preach.
End of quote


I am amazed that all of this hate comes from someone who professes patriotism and love of country. If you wish to toss insults around allow me, I remember the dozens back in my school days.

Your momma is so fat that when she wears her little black dress it looks like outer space.

Congratulations I hear you tried oral sex for the first time, how did your dog taste?

And my favorite from high school; is it true that you have never had sex without first saying, “no, daddy, please nooooo!?”

My point is that insults don’t advance an argument or make points with anyone here. To do so weakens your position and makes it easier for people to dismiss your points without serious consideration. Why would you go down that path? Is it because you have nothing to back up your points of view? If you held everyone in contempt why bother discussing anything with them? You must respect the person or the opinion in order to discuss or debate an issue. You don’t seem to respect people of any stripe other than your own which makes you a bigot.
As much as I would like to join in and insult you in a battle of wits it is only fun when my opponent is armed.
Reply #49 from PolMach Forums Top
Why would you go down that path?
End of quote


I realize those comments are too intellectual for most low brow conservatives.
Reply #50 from JoeUser Forums Top
I realize those comments are too intellectual for most low brow conservatives.
End of quote


At the level you write on it would not be too intellectual for a fifteen year old.

You seem vindictive and petty, you lack substance in your posts, and you continually fail to answer any question posed to you with anything other than invective terms and characterizations. Based on your writings you appear to be racist, sexist, bigoted, and homophobic. You know a typical liberal democrat.